Don,
SATAN has been around for a few years now, and has been implemented
many times by both administrators and hackers both.
My point?
A. An Internet provider does not need a firewall to have adequate
security.
A firewall merely provides a "shield" so that other machines on the
"internal" network at the provider cannot be hit from the outside.
B. Many providers already have firewalls installed and in place. You may
not be aware if your provider has a firewall or not, it is usually
invisible to the user, and access times can vary by computer and
software being run.
C. You refer to the "internet". The internet is no longer a single
entity, nor
run by any single parent. Some providers may choose to use firewalls,
but since a firewall is going to add the cost of a computer and software,
plus rerouting the network throught the firewall, many providers may
choose alternate security methods. Having a firewall does not preclude
a sucessful attack from a hacker, either. It merely provides a shield for
the internal network. A good comparison is a house. If you have a house
with 40 doors, that are all locked and have security alarms, is it more
protected than a house with one door that was left open? You bet it is...
I don't think you will have to worry about this. Not to mention, the
advent of adding
major bandwidth to the internet over the next couple of years should
preclude any
slowdown.
Cheers!
--
??Jan Kohl?? **Diamond Motorsports/Mad Yanks Racing Team**
Computer Systems Programmer
USAF Air-Ground Operations School
Hurlburt Field, FL
Castle Graphics - http://www.theuspits.com/castle/
The Pits - http://www.theuspits.com/