Kai who says it works to a programmed pattern ?
Harjan said this :
'It's preprogrammed however, if you load a game the next session will
be the same weather as before.'
Then you jumped to this :
'so it really isn't "dynamic" at all then? How many different weather
loops do they have for each track? Seems that you could realize which
weather pattern your in and plan accordingly, which could severely
hamper this feature.'
Iv'e found this :
Someone on this news group says something and it becomes true ?
Before you race you are given a forecast showing percentage chance and
severity of rain at half hourly intervals, this forecast may or may
not be 100% accurate. Having put a lot of laps in at Spa (Seemingly
the track with the highest prob of rain) I can see absolutely no
pattern at all. I believe the weather is set by algorithm before the
start of the race and not looked up from a table of weather patterns.
Regards Mike
On Wed, 26 Jul 2000 16:25:10 +0100, Mike Blackmore
>The dynamic weather is a step forward from anything else avalaible in
>the genre.
>Regards Mike
>>I don't mean to sound offensive or self-righteous, but I think many of
>>my sim-racing brethren are a bit odd.
>>Let me start off by saying that the last sim I bought was GPL. I am a
>>GPL fanatic, in fact I handle the GPL page at a very popular web site,
>>that does not mean I refuse to recognize anything besides GPL as a
>>racing sim. What it DOES mean, is that I will no longer accept
>>anything less than GPL in overall proficiency for my hard earned
>>monetary units.
>>Reading the rather optimistic posts regarding GP3, mixed in amongst the
>>numberous ranting condemnations of the game, I'm surprised to see so
>>many people willing to pay for anything but the next step forward.
>>What is the point in supporting underachieving software production
>>teams? I did not buy NASCAR99, NASCAR3, NASCAR Legends or any of the
>>assorted upgrades because they DID NOT DELIVER THE GOODS. When a
>>company makes a leap forward and they or their competitors subsequently
>>fail to at LEAST reach that plateau again, they do not DESERVE to be
>>rewarded with your money. Does this not make sense? Rewarding
>>mediocrity does not encourage innovation. We should be looking ahead,
>>not to the side.
>>Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
>>Before you buy.