I think you have said it ol' buddy. A full field would probably
make my computer BLOW UP! :-)
I sincerely hope they can come up with some solution so that a
full field CAN be run without a framerate of 3 to 4 FPS
Doug
I think you have said it ol' buddy. A full field would probably
make my computer BLOW UP! :-)
I sincerely hope they can come up with some solution so that a
full field CAN be run without a framerate of 3 to 4 FPS
Doug
Please stop replying to posts with new messages (albeit with a "RE:" stuck
on the front of it). Threaded messages are the whole basis of
newsgroups...the replies are attached to the message that is being replied
to. It has a certain unavoidable logic to it. I didn't like seeing my name
appearing in the subject column when all you were doing was replying to an
opinion piece I had previously posted. I, and everyone else, would like to
see your remarks (if we choose to read them) about a message at the same
time we are reading the original message and all the other responses to that
original message.
Thanks,
Marc.
> I think you have said it ol' buddy. A full field would probably
>make my computer BLOW UP! :-)
> I sincerely hope they can come up with some solution so that a
>full field CAN be run without a framerate of 3 to 4 FPS
> Doug