The point your missing here is that d3d is much more cpu intensive, rendition cards and later 3dfx
cards were less cpu intensive because of the way rendition and 3dfx(glide) work. GF cards are great
for OpenGL, you would get higher fps in most all games with OpenGL than d3d with a GF card.
Unfortunately, the OPenGL patch for GPL, whiles its good its not up to modern standards like the
OpenGL stuff for N4/N2002.
--
Biz
"Don't touch that please, your primitive intellect wouldn't understand
alloys and compositions and,......things with molecular structures,....and
the....." - Ash
> Wow, I can't believe I used to play on a pII266 with a herc thriller, and I
> got better fps than I do now! Says a lot for the rendition cards. Too bad
> they don't still make 'em. Then again, I didn't have gigabytes of graphics
> add-ons for GPL back then, and I was running 800x600.
> So is a 3dfx card really less CPU intensive than a GF3? Seems like as all
> the hardware gets faster, it becomes less efficient, throwing more work to
> other hardware. I remeber reading in "four-wheel drift" that for most
> systems, the Rendition-based boards were better than the 3dfx's because they
> took on a whole lot more of the workload, freeing up the CPU. And now
> Nvidias are even more CPU intensive than the 3dfx's. This puts me in an
> awful spot, having to buy another processor and motherboard (and memory) for
> my 16-month old system just so I can take advantage of my new video card.
> Doesn't that seem a bit absurd? I don't think it's worth it right now, I
> keep on upgrading everything to make the game look better and better, but I
> still SUCK! I should stop finding ways to spend money on this sim, a
> "potentially" low cost way to experience race driving, and start worrying
> about finishing a race at Monza without crashing out.
> thanks for the help :-)
> Brook
> > GPL is very CPU intensive and you have a slow one by todays standards. I
> assume you now run d3d
> > whereas b4 with your voodoo card you probably ran 3dfx. d3d is also much
> more processor intensive.
> > The OpenGL patch is good, but at higher resolutions is screws up the menus
> so its almost unusable.
> > Your system is severely processor bound for playing GPL.
> > --
> > Biz
> > "Don't touch that please, your primitive intellect wouldn't understand
> > alloys and compositions and,......things with molecular structures,....and
> > the....." - Ash
> > > Is this normal? I had a Voodoo3 3000 and GPL was great, no probs, maybe
> > > slightly slower FPS with 19ai at the start. Upgraded to the GF3 so I
> could
> > > play F12001, and GPL actually seems slower, I get about 12fps at the
> start
> > > of a race (1024x768). Shouldn't it be lightyears faster? Should I be
> > > running the OpenGL patch instead of D3D?
> > > I'm using Athalon800 w/ AsusA7V m/board, PNY GF3Ti200 (I don't know
> which
> > > driver, it's whichever one was on the Nvidia site yesterday), win98se.
> > > Maybe this is normal, but I wouldn't think it should be??? Any ideas?
> > > Thanks,
> > > Brook