Marc.
-- Your mouse has moved. Windows must be restarted for the change
***************************************************************************
Marc Collins
to take effect. Reboot now?
***************************************************************************
> Your mouse has moved. Windows must be restarted for the change
***************************************************************************
> Marc Collins ***************************************************************************
> to take effect. Reboot now?
> > Realistic damage? Not by a long shot.
> > Marc.
> > --
> > Your mouse has moved. Windows must be restarted for the change
> > to take effect. Reboot now?
Marc.
> > > Realistic damage? Not by a long shot.
> > > Marc.
> > > --
> > > Your mouse has moved. Windows must be restarted for the change
> > > to take effect. Reboot now?
Thank you, and hope you find a game up to your standards
--
Kevin Anderson
> Marc.
> > Do you really think anyone cares how unhappy you are with the sim? Are
> you
> > looking for a consensus or an argument? C'mon man, you've been around
> long
> > enough to know how this all works.
> > Gavel
> > > That's N4 I am referring to, by the way.
> > > > Realistic damage? Not by a long shot.
> > > > Marc.
> > > > --
> > > > Your mouse has moved. Windows must be restarted for the change
> > > > to take effect. Reboot now?
--
Mike Grandy
Precision Racing
www.precision-racing.com
> Thank you, and hope you find a game up to your standards
> --
> Kevin Anderson
> > Are you happy/sad/surprised that the realistic damage in N4 is far from
> > realistic? If you don't have anything to say about it then don't waste
> your
> > time replying to posts on that topic.
> > Marc.
> > > Do you really think anyone cares how unhappy you are with the sim?
Are
> > you
> > > looking for a consensus or an argument? C'mon man, you've been around
> > long
> > > enough to know how this all works.
> > > Gavel
> > > > That's N4 I am referring to, by the way.
> > > > > Realistic damage? Not by a long shot.
> > > > > Marc.
> > > > > --
> > > > > Your mouse has moved. Windows must be restarted for the change
> > > > > to take effect. Reboot now?
Very simple, really.
Marc.
> Thank you, and hope you find a game up to your standards
> --
> Kevin Anderson
> > Are you happy/sad/surprised that the realistic damage in N4 is far from
> > realistic? If you don't have anything to say about it then don't waste
> your
> > time replying to posts on that topic.
> > Marc.
> > > Do you really think anyone cares how unhappy you are with the sim?
Are
> > you
> > > looking for a consensus or an argument? C'mon man, you've been around
> > long
> > > enough to know how this all works.
> > > Gavel
> > > > That's N4 I am referring to, by the way.
> > > > > Realistic damage? Not by a long shot.
> > > > > Marc.
> > > > > --
> > > > > Your mouse has moved. Windows must be restarted for the change
> > > > > to take effect. Reboot now?
G Patricks
>Thank you, and hope you find a game up to your standards
> Marc.
> > Do you really think anyone cares how unhappy you are with the sim? Are
> you
> > looking for a consensus or an argument? C'mon man, you've been around
> long
> > enough to know how this all works.
> > Gavel
> > > That's N4 I am referring to, by the way.
> > > > Realistic damage? Not by a long shot.
> > > > Marc.
> > > > --
> > > > Your mouse has moved. Windows must be restarted for the change
> > > > to take effect. Reboot now?
Barry Clay
Nazi Hater
| Marc, Do us all a favor and return the game. if you don't like it don't
play
| it. And it would be a real bonus for us if you deleted the newsgroup off
| your mail reader.
|
| Thank you, and hope you find a game up to your standards
> Barry Clay
> Nazi Hater
> | Marc, Do us all a favor and return the game. if you don't like it don't
> play
> | it. And it would be a real bonus for us if you deleted the newsgroup off
> | your mail reader.
> |
> | Thank you, and hope you find a game up to your standards
I am confident that patching will fix all of the major problems....but
during what time frame? Given the time it took to patch N3 and NH...it
doesn't look good.
Marc.
> If you don't like someone's post, don't reply. If you're
> insulted/offended by someone's post, kill filter the person. Berating
> someone is just a waste of bandwidth.
> Like Marc, I too am disappointed with the quality of N4. N4 is not an
> entirely new game. In fact, the Nascar Racing series hasn't seen an
> entirely new product since the first one came out; each subsequent
> release amounting to incremental improvements over the previous.
> I expected N4 to be much better than it is. Sure, the physics model
> is great and the graphics are improved. But that's it. Everything
> else is the same as in N3, or worse. I don't expect a game that is in
> large part derived from previous installments to be markedly worse
> than it's predecessors in any aspect.
> However, a large part of the game is broken - single player. The AI
> is dysfunctional at every track, though I haven't tried the plate
> tracks yet. What's the point of a company chasing after every
> driver/sponsor to include in their game, only to portray them as if
> they were trying out for roles in Days of Thunder?
> Given the time between N3 and N4 (remember that N3 was supposed to
> contain GPL's physics), I'm disappointed N4 contains so little new.
> Someone posted earlier about increasing qualifying field sizes - great
> idea! Nope, not in N4. How about a *.rpy-to-avi/mpg/whatever
> feature. Great way to promote the game. Too radical an idea for
> Papyrus I suppose. A season-to-season offline "career" mode? Again,
> nope. Doesn't anyone at Papyrus have some imagination?
> It's great that Papyrus focus' so much on physics and graphics to make
> their games more realistic, but there are quite a few other aspects to
> a game that make it immersive and enjoyable. I hope they make some
> effort in whatever their next release will be to come out with
> something NEW.
> So, don't like my opinions? Well flame me if you like but the best
> thing you can do is ignore my drivel or kill filter me for daring to
> besmirch the good name of Papyrus.
> DD.
> On Sun, 11 Feb 2001 15:33:23 GMT, "Kevin Anderson"
> >Marc, Do us all a favor and return the game. if you don't like it don't
play
> >it. And it would be a real bonus for us if you deleted the newsgroup off
> >your mail reader.
> >Thank you, and hope you find a game up to your standards
N4 is entirely new, from the ground up. New Physics Engine (For the Nascar
Series), and it's the most coveted Physics engine of all time no less. The
graphics engine is also entirely new.
As for the rest, well, Nascar is Nascar. It hasn't changed much in 50
years.
-Larry
> If you don't like someone's post, don't reply. If you're
> insulted/offended by someone's post, kill filter the person. Berating
> someone is just a waste of bandwidth.
> Like Marc, I too am disappointed with the quality of N4. N4 is not an
> entirely new game. In fact, the Nascar Racing series hasn't seen an
> entirely new product since the first one came out; each subsequent
> release amounting to incremental improvements over the previous.
> I expected N4 to be much better than it is. Sure, the physics model
> is great and the graphics are improved. But that's it. Everything
> else is the same as in N3, or worse. I don't expect a game that is in
> large part derived from previous installments to be markedly worse
> than it's predecessors in any aspect.
> However, a large part of the game is broken - single player. The AI
> is dysfunctional at every track, though I haven't tried the plate
> tracks yet. What's the point of a company chasing after every
> driver/sponsor to include in their game, only to portray them as if
> they were trying out for roles in Days of Thunder?
> Given the time between N3 and N4 (remember that N3 was supposed to
> contain GPL's physics), I'm disappointed N4 contains so little new.
> Someone posted earlier about increasing qualifying field sizes - great
> idea! Nope, not in N4. How about a *.rpy-to-avi/mpg/whatever
> feature. Great way to promote the game. Too radical an idea for
> Papyrus I suppose. A season-to-season offline "career" mode? Again,
> nope. Doesn't anyone at Papyrus have some imagination?
> It's great that Papyrus focus' so much on physics and graphics to make
> their games more realistic, but there are quite a few other aspects to
> a game that make it immersive and enjoyable. I hope they make some
> effort in whatever their next release will be to come out with
> something NEW.
> So, don't like my opinions? Well flame me if you like but the best
> thing you can do is ignore my drivel or kill filter me for daring to
> besmirch the good name of Papyrus.
> DD.
> On Sun, 11 Feb 2001 15:33:23 GMT, "Kevin Anderson"
> >Marc, Do us all a favor and return the game. if you don't like it don't
play
> >it. And it would be a real bonus for us if you deleted the newsgroup off
> >your mail reader.
> >Thank you, and hope you find a game up to your standards
