rec.autos.simulators

NASCAR or NASCAR 2?

John Wilso

NASCAR or NASCAR 2?

by John Wilso » Tue, 18 Feb 1997 04:00:00

Everybody in General:

I am considering buying NASCAR Racing, well...tomorrow. :-)  I have a
586/133MHz with 12MB of RAM and a Stealth 64 video card.  I would
appreciate anyone's opinions about upgrading to 16MB and buy NASCAR 2,
or sticking with the original, so I can play it faster.

I do want ALL opinions on this subject...

#24, winner at Dayona (even if under yellow)!

John Wilson

Ron R.

NASCAR or NASCAR 2?

by Ron R. » Tue, 18 Feb 1997 04:00:00

With the price of ram being what it is I would suggest a minimum of
24-32 Mg for any who can.
I'm personaly running on a P200 with hard drive install to a Maxtor
2Gig, Diamond stealth 3d 4Mg, and 64Mg of ram.

Runs great but I still have to boot to a dos session or Win95 locks up
occasionaly on re-entry.

Hope this helps.

Ron


>Everybody in General:

>I am considering buying NASCAR Racing, well...tomorrow. :-)  I have a
>586/133MHz with 12MB of RAM and a Stealth 64 video card.  I would
>appreciate anyone's opinions about upgrading to 16MB and buy NASCAR 2,
>or sticking with the original, so I can play it faster.

>I do want ALL opinions on this subject...

>#24, winner at Dayona (even if under yellow)!

>John Wilson


   ***********************************************
  **  Keep the shiny side up & the hammer down   **
 ***               Ron Riekens II                ***
****              Co-Owner - Driver              ****
**** Maui Sunshine Raceing/*** Photography ****
 ***         NASS BGN Series #97 Pontiac        ***

   ***********************************************

rec.autos.simulators is a usenet newsgroup formed in December, 1993. As this group was always unmoderated there may be some spam or off topic articles included. Some links do point back to racesimcentral.net as we could not validate the original address. Please report any pages that you believe warrant deletion from this archive (include the link in your email). RaceSimCentral.net is in no way responsible and does not endorse any of the content herein.