rec.autos.simulators

Probs with overclacking a 133 to 166 on a Chaintech 5IFM MB

Manfred Hollstei

Probs with overclacking a 133 to 166 on a Chaintech 5IFM MB

by Manfred Hollstei » Wed, 18 Sep 1996 04:00:00

Hi there,

please don't send any flames!

I'm currently running an Intel 133MHz CPU on a Chaintech 5IFM board, so
far no
problems. But Grand Prix 2 (for the Linux guys: it's a very good Formula
1
simulation, but doesn't run under Linux; I haven't tried dosemu yet...)
is
provoking me to see if it runs any better on a 166 CPU. Therefore, I
configured
jumper 20 and 21 to 2.5x CPU speed (according to the manual) and booted
my
computer. Nothing happened, at least not on the monitor; the SCSI disks
are
powered up, but the monitor doesn't seem to get a sync signal: the
normally
green LED on the monitor's power switch remains yellow.

Does anybody of you have an idea, what to do? Again, I don't want to
save the
money for an 166 CPU, I simply want to know (SEE!), how CP2 looks in
SVGA on a
166MHz; if it's any good I'll spend the money for the 166 chip (the 200
is too
expensive)!

Thanks for your reply
--
Manfred Hollstein                       If you have any questions about
Hindenburgstr. 13/1                     GNU SW, you might want to send

FRG

Chris Manes

Probs with overclacking a 133 to 166 on a Chaintech 5IFM MB

by Chris Manes » Fri, 20 Sep 1996 04:00:00

Try changing your bus speed to 50MHZ and using a 3X, It won't be 166MHZ but
it should work.

Jason Harriso

Probs with overclacking a 133 to 166 on a Chaintech 5IFM MB

by Jason Harriso » Sat, 28 Sep 1996 04:00:00


> Try changing your bus speed to 50MHZ and using a 3X, It won't be 166MHZ but
> it should work.

Ye gods - That would slow memory access to a crawl, not to mention PCI
running
at only 25mHz.  The P75 was a slow machine because it had the slowest
bus
speed (oh, and it multiplied by 1.5)

You'd be dropping a 66mHz bus speed by 16mHz for a 33mHz internal
increase?
Hardly worth it - you'd get big latency problems as the CPU waited for
the
bus.  Video transfer rate would fall dramatically as well.

150 mHz should be 2.5 X 60mHz NOT 50 X 3!  You need a CPU that can
handle
fraction multipliers tho' (C-Stepping).

Jet


rec.autos.simulators is a usenet newsgroup formed in December, 1993. As this group was always unmoderated there may be some spam or off topic articles included. Some links do point back to racesimcentral.net as we could not validate the original address. Please report any pages that you believe warrant deletion from this archive (include the link in your email). RaceSimCentral.net is in no way responsible and does not endorse any of the content herein.