rec.autos.simulators

Video card and power supply

Eldre

Video card and power supply

by Eldre » Sun, 11 Jan 2004 07:15:34



>Regarding Radeon 9800 power supply connection:  You are supposed to make
>sure your video card and hard drive (primary hard drive, the one that
>contains your C drive if you have multiple hard drives in your computer)
>share the same power connection!  This is critical on a 9800XT, so much so
>that they provided a "harness" just to use for making this connection.  A
>few people, with spare power connections bi-passed using this harness (think
>it was more of a convenience item rather than a "requirement").....and end
>up not only with a slow video card, but also with having to reinstall their
>operating system!  Seems the "shutdown" of the video card and HD need to be
>coordinated or the ops-sys (WinXP has the biggest problem with this) can't
>save the operating system files to the hard drive fast enough.  After just a
>few shutdowns....your registry is hosed and you have to reinstall because
>the back ups are all hosed too!

Is that power supply suggestion written in the manual that way(to tie the video
to HD)?  Otherwise, why would someone who already HAS extra power connectors
even think it was necessary?

Eldred
--
Homepage - http://www.racesimcentral.net/~epickett
Member
Screamers Racing League
IICC League
GPLRank -2.4    MoGPL rank +302.38
ChallengeRank +54.48   MoC +743.77
Hist. +82.82  MoH in progress
N2k3 rank:in progress

Remove SPAM-OFF to reply.

Eldre

Video card and power supply

by Eldre » Sun, 11 Jan 2004 08:43:02



>PSS:  Your BIOS settings on your mobo are "critical" to getting full
>performance from you video card, especially in regard to 3D ***
>performance.  A.  Make sure you have the latest BIOS version installed and
>the latest "northbridge chip" drivers installed.....AND, don't do this if
>you don't know what you are doing....get help with it first!  B.  Ask others
>who have your mobo what their settings are in the BIOS and what "issues"
>they have found/tweaked to make their rigs perform!

>Example:  On my current rig, with an ASUS A7N8X Deluxe mobo.....if I were to
>set my BIOS to "optimized defaults"......my ***/video card performance
>drops more than 50%!  It's a huge difference!

Anyone here have a Gigabyte GA-7ZX mobo?  Probably not, but it was worth a
shot...<g>

Eldred
--
Homepage - http://www.racesimcentral.net/~epickett
Member
Screamers Racing League
IICC League
GPLRank -2.4    MoGPL rank +302.38
ChallengeRank +54.48   MoC +743.77
Hist. +82.82  MoH in progress
N2k3 rank:in progress

Remove SPAM-OFF to reply.

Eldre

Video card and power supply

by Eldre » Sun, 11 Jan 2004 08:43:02



>I highly doubt that power supply may be the cause, but here're
>few random thoughts... Nvidia supports OpenGL better (unless it has
>changed recently) and Papy games are faster in OpenGL. Might it be
>that difference in OpenGL drivers negate the difference between GF4200
>and Radeon (if you're running in OpenGL of course)? Still it doesn't
>explain the difference between 4200 and 5900. Have you tried to
>reconfigure 3d card from the game (I think it does some benchmarking
>with some purpose)?

I just checked something out of curiousity.  Running N2003 D3D at 1024x768, I
went to the pits in practice(PWF Kyalami).  I set the draw distance to 10% last
week per David's suggestion.  From the***pit view, I get 35 fps.  Clicked to
start a race at the back of the grid, and got 21 fps.  Reset the graphics to
use OGL, didn't change anything else.  In the pits, 24 fps.  On the grid, 12
fps.  Presumably, N2003 would be new enough that it wouldn't need a patch like
in GPL(which I never even KNEW about until last week).  So tell me, how is OGL
faster?  My tests show it as 9-11 fps SLOWER, with no other changes.

Eldred
--
Homepage - http://www.racesimcentral.net/~epickett
Member
Screamers Racing League
IICC League
GPLRank -2.4    MoGPL rank +302.38
ChallengeRank +54.48   MoC +743.77
Hist. +82.82  MoH in progress
N2k3 rank:in progress

Remove SPAM-OFF to reply.

alex

Video card and power supply

by alex » Mon, 12 Jan 2004 01:32:31





>>I highly doubt that power supply may be the cause, but here're
>>few random thoughts... Nvidia supports OpenGL better (unless it has
>>changed recently) and Papy games are faster in OpenGL. Might it be
>>that difference in OpenGL drivers negate the difference between GF4200
>>and Radeon (if you're running in OpenGL of course)? Still it doesn't
>>explain the difference between 4200 and 5900. Have you tried to
>>reconfigure 3d card from the game (I think it does some benchmarking
>>with some purpose)?

> I just checked something out of curiousity.  Running N2003 D3D at
> 1024x768, I went to the pits in practice(PWF Kyalami).  I set the draw
> distance to 10% last week per David's suggestion.  From the***pit
> view, I get 35 fps.  Clicked to start a race at the back of the grid,
> and got 21 fps.  Reset the graphics to use OGL, didn't change anything
> else.  In the pits, 24 fps.  On the grid, 12 fps.  Presumably, N2003
> would be new enough that it wouldn't need a patch like in GPL(which I
> never even KNEW about until last week).  So tell me, how is OGL faster?
>  My tests show it as 9-11 fps SLOWER, with no other changes.

> Eldred

Do you have Nvidia card with good drivers? I don't have any OGL patch, but
I was testing with drawing distance at 80% (also 1024x768). I'm getting
50fps alone and around 35 at the back of the grid (GF2MX here). Also, in
the OpenGL driver panel there's a bunch of settings. I have no clue what
they mean and I have everything set to default (whatever the driver
installs). Another possibility is that you have AA or AF set.

Alex.

Eldre

Video card and power supply

by Eldre » Tue, 13 Jan 2004 09:51:36



>> else.  In the pits, 24 fps.  On the grid, 12 fps.  Presumably, N2003
>> would be new enough that it wouldn't need a patch like in GPL(which I
>> never even KNEW about until last week).  So tell me, how is OGL faster?
>>  My tests show it as 9-11 fps SLOWER, with no other changes.

>> Eldred
>Do you have Nvidia card with good drivers? I don't have any OGL patch, but
>I was testing with drawing distance at 80% (also 1024x768). I'm getting
>50fps alone and around 35 at the back of the grid (GF2MX here). Also, in
>the OpenGL driver panel there's a bunch of settings. I have no clue what
>they mean and I have everything set to default (whatever the driver
>installs). Another possibility is that you have AA or AF set.

No AA definitely.  I don't *think* I have AF - what *is* that?  I also don't
have an OpenGL specific control panel.  In the driver list I see D3D and
OGL(both .4523), so they're both loaded.  Just no way I see to change anything
specific to OGL...

Eldred
--
Homepage - http://www.umich.edu/~epickett
Member
Screamers Racing League
IICC League
GPLRank -2.4    MoGPL rank +302.38
ChallengeRank +54.48   MoC +743.77
Hist. +82.82  MoH in progress
N2k3 rank:in progress

Remove SPAM-OFF to reply.

alex

Video card and power supply

by alex » Tue, 13 Jan 2004 13:27:22



Anisotropic filtering
I have "Additional properties" button in the screen where it lists drivers
and that's where I can change OGL settings

Alex.

Larr

Video card and power supply

by Larr » Thu, 15 Jan 2004 03:25:50

Yeah, I don't get this one at all.

I use a spare tap on my 9800 Pro and all seems fine.

-Larry




> >Regarding Radeon 9800 power supply connection:  You are supposed to make
> >sure your video card and hard drive (primary hard drive, the one that
> >contains your C drive if you have multiple hard drives in your computer)
> >share the same power connection!  This is critical on a 9800XT, so much
so
> >that they provided a "harness" just to use for making this connection.  A
> >few people, with spare power connections bi-passed using this harness
(think
> >it was more of a convenience item rather than a "requirement").....and
end
> >up not only with a slow video card, but also with having to reinstall
their
> >operating system!  Seems the "shutdown" of the video card and HD need to
be
> >coordinated or the ops-sys (WinXP has the biggest problem with this)
can't
> >save the operating system files to the hard drive fast enough.  After
just a
> >few shutdowns....your registry is hosed and you have to reinstall because
> >the back ups are all hosed too!

> Is that power supply suggestion written in the manual that way(to tie the
video
> to HD)?  Otherwise, why would someone who already HAS extra power
connectors
> even think it was necessary?

> Eldred
> --
> Homepage - http://www.umich.edu/~epickett
> Member
> Screamers Racing League
> IICC League
> GPLRank -2.4    MoGPL rank +302.38
> ChallengeRank +54.48   MoC +743.77
> Hist. +82.82  MoH in progress
> N2k3 rank:in progress

> Remove SPAM-OFF to reply.

Eldre

Video card and power supply

by Eldre » Fri, 16 Jan 2004 10:55:25



>> No AA definitely.  I don't *think* I have AF - what *is* that?
>Anisotropic filtering
>>  I also
>> don't have an OpenGL specific control panel.  In the driver list I see
>> D3D and OGL(both .4523), so they're both loaded.  Just no way I see to
>> change anything specific to OGL...
>I have "Additional properties" button in the screen where it lists drivers
>and that's where I can change OGL settings

Hmm...I don't have that.  I can go to control panel>display>settings and click
on the advanced button.  If I then click on the GeForce 4 tab there's a little
window that pops out on the left.  Performance and Quality settings has a line
for D3D and OGL.
D3D has these options:
Enable fog table emulation(currently checked)
Display logo when running D3D applications(not checked)
Mipmap detail level(best image quality)
PCI texture memory size(47MB)

OGL has these options:
Disable support for enhanced CPU(not checked)
Enable conformant OGL(not checked)
Default color depth(use desktop color depth)
Buffer flipping(auto select)
Vertical sync(on by default)

On the Performance line itself:
Image settings(slider bar on quality)
Anti aliasing(slider on application)
Anisotropic filtering(slider on application)
Texture Sharpening(not checked)

Eldred
--
Homepage - http://www.umich.edu/~epickett
Member
Screamers Racing League
IICC League
GPLRank -2.4    MoGPL rank +302.38
ChallengeRank +54.48   MoC +743.77
Hist. +82.82  MoH in progress
N2k3 rank:in progress

Remove SPAM-OFF to reply.

Tim

Video card and power supply

by Tim » Fri, 16 Jan 2004 11:00:45

On Tue, 06 Jan 2004 23:28:30 -0600, Dave Henrie


>    The general impression I have gotten about the Nforce1 motherboards is that they
>are slow.   Especially compared to a  Nforce2 mb.  Also you have onboard sound, and
>while they have made great strides in that area...I just have never felt comfortable
>using onboard sound.   Call me Han Solo...."I've been all over the galaxy, but I have
>never seen an onboard sound setup I like.  Gimmie a good Sound Card anyday."
>  And finally...with all the videocard switching you've done, there is a good chance
>you have lots of nvidia driver fragments hiding on your system.  Do a complete
>scrubbing of your old drivers before installing the ATI drivers.   Most 3d sites have
>utilities that will help you with that.  Good luck.
>dave henrie

I just did some system jockeying after upgrading my main machine.
One of my AMD machines went from a SBLive Value to built in NVidia
audio and gained 7fps. I suppose some of this could be attributable to
the motherboard, but both were high quality boards (old one was a
CUSL2, new one a A7N8XE-Deluxe.
I read that the SBLives had relatively high resource use, and I think
that helps to confirm it.

While in the midst of the upgrade, which involved buying some new
parts and bumping other stuff down to other machines I also took a few
minutes to test the differences between the GeForce Ti4200 and the
Radeon 9800 Pro in my 1.9ghz Athlon (the Pro was purchased for 3ghz
machine, but I wanted to see how much of a difference it made in the
1.9). All I did to get the card working was uninstall the NVidia
drivers from Add/Remove Software and delete the NVidia registry
entries using Regedit. Upgrade went very smooth.

For anyone curious about the speed of the 9800 Pro in a lesser
machine, I jotted down some 3DMark 2003 numbers...
AMD 1.9ghz/Ti4200 scored 1312.
Same machine with/128meg 9800 Pro scored 4989.
AMD 3ghz/128meg 9800 Pro scored 5244.

The 9800 Pro works pretty well in lesser spec machines.

Tim

Dave Henri

Video card and power supply

by Dave Henri » Fri, 16 Jan 2004 11:54:43


   3dmark is a good indicator of video speed, but other factors such as
memory speed, system bus, age of the motherboard, and drivers for
most of these, can also hinder or enhance overall performance.  
A cleanly setup year old system can often outperform a new box if
the newer has not been properly sorted...even if it is a generation
ahead in cpu and video.

dave henrie


rec.autos.simulators is a usenet newsgroup formed in December, 1993. As this group was always unmoderated there may be some spam or off topic articles included. Some links do point back to racesimcentral.net as we could not validate the original address. Please report any pages that you believe warrant deletion from this archive (include the link in your email). RaceSimCentral.net is in no way responsible and does not endorse any of the content herein.