rec.autos.simulators

God bless the troops that protect us.

Mike Hun

God bless the troops that protect us.

by Mike Hun » Sat, 03 Jun 2006 20:09:15





>>>    In my world -

>>>    Priority #1 is avoiding the above.
>>>    Priority #2 is not having sex with a 2nd hand women.
>>>    Priority #3 is avoiding physical death

>>>    Priorty #3 pales into insignificance compared to the other 2. No
>>>point in physical life if one is spiritually dead! :)

>>Wow, that's some seriously twisted world, glad I don't live there.  What
>>is this second hand women thing you've made up?  No one over four***
>>years old?

>     Yes, well the world is rome after all. I'm one of those that is entirely
> uninterested in being a roman - I like to fly first class only which is, in
> fact, a huge understatement. Maybe saying that I like my human existence to
> mean something is a better way of puting it.

>     If there's nothing wrong with sex with a 2nd hand woman then there's
> nothing wrong with anything now is there? The idea of it has always made me
> want to vomit - I guess some have never tasted pride - pity. It is a genuine
> tragedy that there are so many in the world that know no better.

>     No doubt, the likes of you will curse your own children with your
> pathetic lifestyle as well - truely tragic. It will mean absolutely nothing
> to be human on this planrt soon.

There's a new Carry On film being cast at the moment. You should try for
it - it's call Carry On ***ing. As a stupid Aussie ***er, you should
get the lead, no problem.
Mitch -

God bless the troops that protect us.

by Mitch - » Mon, 05 Jun 2006 13:05:30

This is somehow OK?  Or youre just a *** with more time than sense?

what a sad ***.....

..|..


Mitch -

God bless the troops that protect us.

by Mitch - » Mon, 05 Jun 2006 13:14:20

What, more hypocrisy?  Should I keep looking?

Youre just mad because the attention isnt on you LOL.




>> "Poll of troops in Iraq sees 72% support for withdrawal within a year.

>> Seventy-two percent of troops on the ground in Iraq think U.S. military
>> forces should get out of the country within a year, according to a Zogby
>> poll released Tuesday."

>  how nice.  I'm sure when the Military is run as a democracy then the
> results of such a poll would be relevant.  Without knowing the internals
> of
> such a poll, the numbers are meaningless.  I can site the record numbers
> of
> re-inlistments as just as valid or non-valid a number as the above poll.

>  for example..
> Question:  If the Iraqi Military/Police proved they could defend the
> populace,  would you want to leave
> Iraq by the end of the year?

> for example:
> Question:  Since we all know there will be no victory in Iraq, do you want
> to leave by year's end or wait til the politicians feel they have run out
> of Grunts to kill?

> for example:
> Question.  Do you agree with President Bush's plan to reduce troop
> strength
> as the Iraqi Goverment proves it can defend it's people?  If so, would you
> hope this was possible by year's end?

> for example:
> Question.  If you knew the Iranian backed insurgents would have free reign
> to *** possibly millions of Iraqis after a premature US pullout. would
> you still want to leave by year's end?

> for example:
> Question.  If you knew this topic was out of the realm of this newsgroup
> and you continued to post anyway,  would you therefore expect everyone
> else
> to be just as frivolous with any rule and therefore our soldiers would be
> completely justified in any action they took against any group?

> dave henrie

Mitch -

God bless the troops that protect us.

by Mitch - » Mon, 05 Jun 2006 13:16:07

Yet another.  Let me refresh your ***ed up memory ok postman....

This is ok because YOU wrote it, right?

Mitch

------------------------------------------------

 NO!  There are places to discus this tripe just as there are place for me
to take a DUMP!  People have asked both sides NICELY to stop.  Since
neither seems to want to listen I won't be nice.

  I      DON'T     CARE   ABOUT    YOUR     POLITICAL   POSITIONS.

     I  DON'T CARE IF YOU HAVE BEEN INSULTED OR MIS-INTERPRETED.  GO
SOMEWHERE ELSE.  GO TO ALT.WATERCOOLER.PISSONTHEOTHERGUY.  BUT DON'T COME
HERE AND FILL UP THE NEWSGROUP WITH ANY MORE POLITICAL TALK.

When folks ask you NICELY to stop and all the both of you do is rationalize
why what YOU have to say is too important to be quiet...then you just don't
have any consideration for the group.  I'm guilty too,  I added to
this..but now I've seen my error and I'm stopping.  AND SO THE FVCK SHOULD
YOU YOU GO**AMN LITTLE FOURYEAROLDS!!!!   Do I need to be any plainer?

 This is no different than some auto software guy flooding our newsgroup
with pirated auto diagnostic software. It's wrong.  If you don't know
it...you should.




>> YES! He was lying. Imagine, a democrat and a republican both wrong! The
>> world is ending! How can there be more than 2 sides. My poor American
>> brain can't handle that!

>  Then to what purpose would two leaders of different parties tell the same
> lie?  What benefit, what gain did each seek by telling the lie.
> To say someone lied is far far FAR different than to say someone was
> wrong.

> dave henrie

Dave Henri

God bless the troops that protect us.

by Dave Henri » Mon, 05 Jun 2006 15:07:23



  Check your email.  THEN maybe you will understand.  
thankyou

dave henrie

Mitch -

God bless the troops that protect us.

by Mitch - » Mon, 05 Jun 2006 15:39:56

Got it, misunderstandings happen.

Sorry for going off so quickly.  Ignore the rest of em ok Dave ;)

Back to the regularly scheduled programming...

Mitch


maybe you will understand.

Mike Hun

God bless the troops that protect us.

by Mike Hun » Mon, 05 Jun 2006 17:01:14


> This is somehow OK?  Or youre just a *** with more time than sense?

> what a sad ***.....

Oh, very intelligent reply! <ROLLS EYES>

> ..|..


>>The first one I agree.

>>The second one,  I have no knowledge and don't understand why
>>home***ity is bad to spread.  Now..Aids..that is different.
>>From what read of Abu Graib..it was Iraqi men raping Iraqi
>>young men at the wink and nod of America.

>>The third one...I don't see the connection.  Bin Laden's beef was
>>with having Infidels stationed in the Holy Land(Saudi Arabia)  And
>>having the Saudi Prince choose America to defend them instead of the
>>Mujahadeen(sp?)  Other Wahabi terrorists have used our decadent lifestyle
>>as reason enough to destroy and kill. The al-qaida group was attacking
>>because we are the USA, not because we are USA Soldiers.  While they did
>>strike directly at US military, (USS Cole, The Khobar Towers) they also
>>directed attacks at symbols of the US goverment, like the two embassies
>>in
>>Africa that were bombed and...one might argue...the two separate attacks
>>on
>>the Twin Towers.  So a bad soldier is just as much a symbol of the
>>Goverment as a good soldier.  To groups like Al Quaida, there is zero
>>difference.  And most of these attacks took place against a Democratic
>>President,  they do not care about our petty distinctions.  It is the USA
>>they attack because we are the USA,  not because a Republican President
>>is in power, or, as shown above, a Democratic one.

>>  I figure we will see several *** trials resulting from the
>>Hadifa shootings.  Already there have been officers that have been
>>releived of command.(a career death sentence if nothing else)  The
>>actions of the 'bad' soldiers will be punished.  I doubt though,  that
>>the punishments of the Marines will sate the hatred of the military by
>>many.

>>  I work in an industry that is flooded with retired Vetrans, and they
>>span the gamut of good to bad.  As with ANY group, beit Middle Eastern
>>Madrassa Teachers, Politicians, citizens, and even college educated
>>proffesionals,  there will be evil in every group.  Joining the Army does
>>not guarentee there are no bad apples,  just as joining a political party
>>does not guarentee that all the elected officials will be motivated to
>>act in the best interests of their constituants.

>>  I will end this by declaring my support of the United States Soldier.
>>I do not hate them,  I  am not any more disgusted of their actions than I
>>am of any group.  I marvel at the sacrifices they make on my behalf.

>>dave henrie

Dave Henri

God bless the troops that protect us.

by Dave Henri » Tue, 06 Jun 2006 03:23:28


win.ntli.net:

  Mike,  Mitch was working with a scrambled time line.  He saw my posts
asking for this and all other political topics to end before he saw posts
I had placed previously.   But...this still doesn't solve anything.  All we
have been doing is insulting and defaming each other.  
Clearly this is not the purpose of this type of newsgroup.
   I admitted I participated...I have listened to those who wish this and
other topics to cease.  So That is what I will continue to maintain. Until
we can shut these down.  
   If anyone wishes,  my spam filter is fairly easy to figure out. Please
email me privately and I will attempt to clarify any point.  I was blunt to
the point of insult in the hopes of grabbing the attention of my fellow
offenders.  Hopefully we can all learn the value of silence.

Byron, Mitch, Lance,  DGF  etc  We are doing a disservice to this group.  I
value the input of all of you, but not when we are going ballistic at each
other.  

dh

==--=

God bless the troops that protect us.

by ==--= » Tue, 06 Jun 2006 12:17:20

Brilliant retort mitch.

I see that thinking is not your strong point.

Best you stick to regurgitating your rediculous "party" line, seems that is
all you are capable of.

If you wanted people to pay any attention to you at all.....
You should at least try to come across as a person capable of arguing his
position as opposed to your infantile playground approach of name calling et
al.

Seek help.
========


> Take another hit you'll get over yourself eventually...




> This is somehow OK?  Or youre just a *** with more time than sense?

> what a sad ***.....

> ..|..


>> The first one I agree.

>> The second one,  I have no knowledge and don't understand why
>> home***ity is bad to spread.  Now..Aids..that is different.
>> From what read of Abu Graib..it was Iraqi men raping Iraqi
>> young men at the wink and nod of America.

>> The third one...I don't see the connection.  Bin Laden's beef was
>> with having Infidels stationed in the Holy Land(Saudi Arabia)  And
>> having the Saudi Prince choose America to defend them instead of the
>> Mujahadeen(sp?)  Other Wahabi terrorists have used our decadent lifestyle
>> as reason enough to destroy and kill. The al-qaida group was attacking
>> because we are the USA, not because we are USA Soldiers.  While they did
>> strike directly at US military, (USS Cole, The Khobar Towers) they also
>> directed attacks at symbols of the US goverment, like the two embassies
>> in
>> Africa that were bombed and...one might argue...the two separate attacks
>> on
>> the Twin Towers.  So a bad soldier is just as much a symbol of the
>> Goverment as a good soldier.  To groups like Al Quaida, there is zero
>> difference.  And most of these attacks took place against a Democratic
>> President,  they do not care about our petty distinctions.  It is the USA
>> they attack because we are the USA,  not because a Republican President
>> is in power, or, as shown above, a Democratic one.

>>   I figure we will see several *** trials resulting from the
>> Hadifa shootings.  Already there have been officers that have been
>> releived of command.(a career death sentence if nothing else)  The
>> actions of the 'bad' soldiers will be punished.  I doubt though,  that
>> the punishments of the Marines will sate the hatred of the military by
>> many.

>>   I work in an industry that is flooded with retired Vetrans, and they
>> span the gamut of good to bad.  As with ANY group, beit Middle Eastern
>> Madrassa Teachers, Politicians, citizens, and even college educated
>> proffesionals,  there will be evil in every group.  Joining the Army does
>> not guarentee there are no bad apples,  just as joining a political party
>> does not guarentee that all the elected officials will be motivated to
>> act in the best interests of their constituants.

>>   I will end this by declaring my support of the United States Soldier.
>> I do not hate them,  I  am not any more disgusted of their actions than I
>> am of any group.  I marvel at the sacrifices they make on my behalf.

>> dave henrie

Mitch -

God bless the troops that protect us.

by Mitch - » Tue, 06 Jun 2006 12:55:16

I could really care less what you have to say.  Not sure why you even bother
(stalker tendencies perhaps)....

Last post Ill see from you though, buh-bye loser ;)

Don't you Canucks have your own internet to***up?  Why do you insist on
stinking up OURS?

Mitch

--
"Don't pee on my leg then tell me it's raing".


Byron Forbe

God bless the troops that protect us.

by Byron Forbe » Tue, 06 Jun 2006 18:30:32


    Now that is pretty good! :) Too bad you're on the wrong side of the
fence.


rec.autos.simulators is a usenet newsgroup formed in December, 1993. As this group was always unmoderated there may be some spam or off topic articles included. Some links do point back to racesimcentral.net as we could not validate the original address. Please report any pages that you believe warrant deletion from this archive (include the link in your email). RaceSimCentral.net is in no way responsible and does not endorse any of the content herein.