rec.autos.simulators

CPR:WHY THE BAD RAP?

Dtrade

CPR:WHY THE BAD RAP?

by Dtrade » Sun, 05 Apr 1998 04:00:00

I heard about the Glide dll file and saw that CPR is $20 till the end of the
year.
[$20 mail in rebate] So I figured if it's got a glide "patch" and its only $20
I'll give
it try.I don't think it thats bad.Not like it was made out in this NG.Okay it's
no
GP2 or NFS2 SE but i like it.The graphics could have used the Glide API alot
better but they are pretty good and it runs very nice on my p200mmx 64 EDO
voodoo 1.As far as the game play and interface I feel it lives up to what it
advertises.Its Cart racing,nothing more nothing less.If you know what cart
racing
is than some oval tracks shouldn't have come to a surprise to anyone.The camera
views are decent and the options are more than adequate.I've had a lot worse
crappy "sims" in my time.And believe me,I'm not a member of the microsoft fan
club.Anyway TRI did the sim not microsoft.They only removed a little dll file
from
it the scumbags,but so is the ways of big time business.The AI in CPR need
some street smarts but they're not that thick.I think CPR got a bad rap.

John Walla

CPR:WHY THE BAD RAP?

by John Walla » Sun, 05 Apr 1998 04:00:00


The above is exactly why the bad rap. It's "more than adequate" and
"not as crappy as some other sims" - not quite what was advertised on
the box is it?

Cheers!
John

Byron Forbe

CPR:WHY THE BAD RAP?

by Byron Forbe » Mon, 06 Apr 1998 05:00:00


> I heard about the Glide dll file and saw that CPR is $20 till the end of the
> year.
> [$20 mail in rebate] So I figured if it's got a glide "patch" and its only $20
> I'll give
> it try.I don't think it thats bad.Not like it was made out in this NG.Okay it's
> no
> GP2 or NFS2 SE but i like it.The graphics could have used the Glide API alot
> better but they are pretty good and it runs very nice on my p200mmx 64 EDO
> voodoo 1.As far as the game play and interface I feel it lives up to what it
> advertises.Its Cart racing,nothing more nothing less.If you know what cart
> racing
> is than some oval tracks shouldn't have come to a surprise to anyone.The camera
> views are decent and the options are more than adequate.I've had a lot worse
> crappy "sims" in my time.And believe me,I'm not a member of the microsoft fan
> club.Anyway TRI did the sim not microsoft.They only removed a little dll file
> from
> it the scumbags,but so is the ways of big time business.The AI in CPR need
> some street smarts but they're not that thick.I think CPR got a bad rap.

   Ok, let me see :)) I'll go out on a limb here with a prediction. When
GPL hits the shelves, get it, and then tell us what you think of CPR!

   Btw, what are you trying to say as reguards ovals. Do you think some
people don't like ovals???????? Go play on the ovals for a while and you
will discover that your car has a top speed beyond which it cannot go no
matter what the setup. Also you will find the AI so pitiful on ovals
that all things considered the game may as well been shipped without
ovals. CPR is a thing that does not even qualify as a game let alone a
sim and it deserves all the flack it gets!

   I'll go out on another limb now :) As far as the MS/TRI thing goes,
we can see by the glide ommision who was controling the quality of this
product and also who deliberately released it prematurely for Xmas. We
can also see that TRI could not get away from MS quick enough. All blame
lies with MS for an absolute certainty. I'd say if TRI had total
control, the game might not have been released even now and may have
been a completely different story altogether. CPR has unfinished
masterpiece written all over it! But unfortunately an unfinished
masterpiece = a pile of junk!


rec.autos.simulators is a usenet newsgroup formed in December, 1993. As this group was always unmoderated there may be some spam or off topic articles included. Some links do point back to racesimcentral.net as we could not validate the original address. Please report any pages that you believe warrant deletion from this archive (include the link in your email). RaceSimCentral.net is in no way responsible and does not endorse any of the content herein.