Snake.
>* Sent from AltaVista http://www.racesimcentral.net/ Where you can also find
The Arrows drivers *would* say that because they were involved in the
development. I remember hearing the same things about Johnny Herbert's
GP and Prost GP.
--
Cheers!
Graeme Nash
David G Fisher
> They can say that because they don't know that one can program better
> physics in a computer sim (in other words they haven't played any sim
> with better physics). Also the Arrows team can't be that great.. how
> many races have they won? ;-)
> [It's a joke son, I said it's a joke!]
> --
> **************************** Michael E. Carver *************************
> Upside out, or inside down...False alarm the only game in town.
> =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=<[ /./. [- < ]>=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
I sure did see it. Hey... Where did they finish in that race?
Anyone can make a car do good for a few laps. Bottom
line is that their shit blew up and they ended up near the
bottom.
Duh.
--
High Gear: "...Their tails weren't wide open like that."
David Kaemmer: "Yeah. It might have been a little exaggerated. But I don't think
that it's too far off."
--David Cook
wrote...
>><snip>
>>(GC)
>>>He shouldnt have even bothered making the game with a model like this its to
>>>easy to drive and no fun after gpl
>>Maybe he didn't make the game for YOU, Danny. Maybe for the 2.999.000 other
>>people (1000 GPL freaks excluded :-) ) who meant to buy it and are going to be
>>thrilled by the weather, the AI etc...
>>Just say that you don't like it and that you keep driving GPL. That's more than
>>enough.
>He didn't slag the AI or the weather. Those are the best there has been to
>date. It's the physics model that's wacked. You really have to drive the game
>to know what I mean.
>Alex
JoH
