rec.autos.simulators

G/FX card upgrade not as fast as expected

Eldre

G/FX card upgrade not as fast as expected

by Eldre » Fri, 20 Feb 2004 10:28:01



>OGL worked just fine.  Only trouble was it was ACTUALLY slower than D3D
>by about 3 or 4 fps in NR2003.

Good - I'm not the only one who saw slower FPS with OGL.  Except mine was a lot
more than 3 or 4 fps slower.  It was more like 10-12...

Eldred
--
http://www.racesimcentral.net/~epickett
Screamers League
IICC League
GPLRank -6.0    MoGPL rank +267.80
Ch.Rank +52.58   MoC +741.71
Hist. +82.34  MoH:na
N2k3 rank:in progress
Slayer Spektera lvl 68 assassin
Slayer Spectral_K lvl 38 Necro
US East

Eldre

G/FX card upgrade not as fast as expected

by Eldre » Fri, 20 Feb 2004 10:33:18



>OGL worked just fine.  Only trouble was it was ACTUALLY slower than D3D
>by about 3 or 4 fps in NR2003.

Good - I'm not the only one who saw slower FPS with OGL.  Except mine was a lot
more than 3 or 4 fps slower.  It was more like 10-12...

Eldred
--
http://www.umich.edu/~epickett
Screamers League
IICC League
GPLRank -6.0    MoGPL rank +267.80
Ch.Rank +52.58   MoC +741.71
Hist. +82.34  MoH:na
N2k3 rank:in progress
Slayer Spektera lvl 68 assassin
Slayer Spectral_K lvl 38 Necro
US East

Eldre

G/FX card upgrade not as fast as expected

by Eldre » Fri, 20 Feb 2004 10:34:26



>OGL worked just fine.  Only trouble was it was ACTUALLY slower than D3D
>by about 3 or 4 fps in NR2003.

Good - I'm not the only one who saw slower FPS with OGL.  Except mine was a lot
more than 3 or 4 fps slower.  It was more like 10-12...

Eldred
--
http://www.umich.edu/~epickett
Screamers League
IICC League
GPLRank -6.0    MoGPL rank +267.80
Ch.Rank +52.58   MoC +741.71
Hist. +82.34  MoH:na
N2k3 rank:in progress
Slayer Spektera lvl 68 assassin
Slayer Spectral_K lvl 38 Necro
US East

Eldre

G/FX card upgrade not as fast as expected

by Eldre » Fri, 20 Feb 2004 10:34:16



>OGL worked just fine.  Only trouble was it was ACTUALLY slower than D3D
>by about 3 or 4 fps in NR2003.

Good - I'm not the only one who saw slower FPS with OGL.  Except mine was a lot
more than 3 or 4 fps slower.  It was more like 10-12...

Eldred
--
http://www.umich.edu/~epickett
Screamers League
IICC League
GPLRank -6.0    MoGPL rank +267.80
Ch.Rank +52.58   MoC +741.71
Hist. +82.34  MoH:na
N2k3 rank:in progress
Slayer Spektera lvl 68 assassin
Slayer Spectral_K lvl 38 Necro
US East

Sting3

G/FX card upgrade not as fast as expected

by Sting3 » Sat, 21 Feb 2004 02:15:59

Sorry Eldred,

maybe you should post that, once or twice...   <G>




>> OGL worked just fine.  Only trouble was it was ACTUALLY slower than
>> D3D by about 3 or 4 fps in NR2003.

> Good - I'm not the only one who saw slower FPS with OGL.  Except mine
> was a lot more than 3 or 4 fps slower.  It was more like 10-12...

> Eldred

Byron John Forbe

G/FX card upgrade not as fast as expected

by Byron John Forbe » Sat, 21 Feb 2004 03:25:41




> >OGL worked just fine.  Only trouble was it was ACTUALLY slower than D3D
> >by about 3 or 4 fps in NR2003.

> Good - I'm not the only one who saw slower FPS with OGL.  Except mine was
a lot
> more than 3 or 4 fps slower.  It was more like 10-12...

   What was that again? :)

rec.autos.simulators is a usenet newsgroup formed in December, 1993. As this group was always unmoderated there may be some spam or off topic articles included. Some links do point back to racesimcentral.net as we could not validate the original address. Please report any pages that you believe warrant deletion from this archive (include the link in your email). RaceSimCentral.net is in no way responsible and does not endorse any of the content herein.