>hey man!
>ive raced bikes and "driven my car "
Wrong, in the 'real' world.
A very, very fast car may just be able to keep up with a modern
run-of-the-mill sports bike costing one tenth of the price, but usually not.
Example:
Standard 1998 Fireblade with 130kg rider is well over 520 bhp per ton.
(And an R1 is probably pushing more like 600 bhp per ton, even in standard
trim.)
Standard 1998 Ferrari 355 with 130kg driver is 225 bhp per ton.
(And yes, I've spent plenty of time driving the vehicles listed above.)
Bike wins, no contest. And the bike is a fraction of the price, which leaves
you plenty of money for tune-up kits. I put a full-race pipe, race bodywork,
re-jet, Dyno, Ohlins suspension, etc., etc. on mine for what one minor
service on a F355 would cost.
The last 3 mag reviews over here in the UK that have pitched top road-going
sports cars against modern sports bikes have seen the bikes dominate ALL the
time at EVERY circuit. In the wet, the cars dominate, though.
New Porsche 911 is 0-100 mph in 11 seconds.
Blade and R1 are about 5.1 seconds. Nuff said.
Just my two pennies.
Steve P.