pretty accurate model. Maybe the elevation change going out of the last
several turns isn't shown right but the rest seemed pretty good to me.
Any other comments on it?
jb
Any other comments on it?
jb
This sim \ game is certainly growing on me...
Peter Hooper
> Any other comments on it?
> jb
Your right, it's probably the best track model in the game. Probably one of
the few. The only problem could be Mergulho/turn 11 (who doesn't have much
downhill banking like real-life), Turn6/7 (the double right fast hander
going into the sharp corners has a wrong camber I would say) and Subida Do
Lago/T4 having a radius a little too big. After that (they are small
nitpicks), I'll say the track is very, very good. Oh and the bumps on the
frontstraight are over-done, even if Interlagos is a very bumpy tracks. But
of course, they said it modeled the 2000 tracks, so the bumps have been
flattened, even if ISI probably did not take that in account. Anybody who
watched the race today saw that the frequency of the bumps were very fast
and hard, but not long up's and down's like in F1 2000. On a rate of 1 to
10, I'll give it an easy 8, while Ubisoft's version would be a 7. Don't
remember the original Gp2 version, but there's one very good one at
http://www.grandprix2.com/ (best one in any version).
The approach to Ferra Dura is still very realistic!
--
-- Fran?ois Mnard <ymenard>
-- May the Downforce be with you...
-- http://www.WeRace.net
-- People think it must be fun to be a super genius, but they don't realise
how hard it is to put up with all the idiots in the world.