rec.autos.simulators

GP3 Site... Spelling mistake or really bad planing.

DjFI

GP3 Site... Spelling mistake or really bad planing.

by DjFI » Sun, 12 Dec 1999 04:00:00

On the offical gp3 site... www.f1grandprix3.com under Game
Overview\Features it says Multiplayer on LAN for 4+... I was wondering
what this ment.  I checked out the FAQ this was there....

Q. What about multiplayer?
    A. As well as supporting hot-seat and direct serial link, GP3 will
also support a minimum of 4 players via LAN.

Let me get this right... you MUST have 4 players to play a multiplayer
LAN match?  Is it just me or is this really messed up?

DjFIL

ymenar

GP3 Site... Spelling mistake or really bad planing.

by ymenar » Sun, 12 Dec 1999 04:00:00


It's a typical FIA *** theory !

--
-- Fran?ois Mnard <ymenard>
-- May the Downforce be with you...

"People think it must be fun to be a super genius, but they don't realise
how hard it is to put up with all the idiots in the world."

Dave Henri

GP3 Site... Spelling mistake or really bad planing.

by Dave Henri » Sun, 12 Dec 1999 04:00:00

  I think what they are saying is that in a LAN enviroment, 4 players
and "maybe" more will be smooth.  The minimum they are shooting for is
not the # of players, but how many drivers can join before it starts
timing out, or crashing because of lost packets etc.  
  8 is pretty much a default # when LAN users are counted, but they may
not be able to guarentee smooth gameplay with that many, so what they
are saying is......game play won't suffer with 4 or more players.  Thats
the minimum # they are willing to accept.  If they get 6 playing
smoothly fine, that means 2 will run even better.
dave henrie

> On the offical gp3 site... www.f1grandprix3.com under Game
> Overview\Features it says Multiplayer on LAN for 4+... I was wondering
> what this ment.  I checked out the FAQ this was there....

> Q. What about multiplayer?
>     A. As well as supporting hot-seat and direct serial link, GP3 will
> also support a minimum of 4 players via LAN.

> Let me get this right... you MUST have 4 players to play a multiplayer
> LAN match?  Is it just me or is this really messed up?

> DjFIL

Markus Stiepe

GP3 Site... Spelling mistake or really bad planing.

by Markus Stiepe » Mon, 13 Dec 1999 04:00:00

.........still cant believe they wont include Internet-support...........are
we in the 19th century still? Have they ever heard of RAS? ........if
so.........did  they ever read the GP3-posts here?.......ahh
well.......still hoping for the best
Maaki



Kenneth Verbur

GP3 Site... Spelling mistake or really bad planing.

by Kenneth Verbur » Mon, 13 Dec 1999 04:00:00

Unfortunately the FIA doesn't allow for Internet-support with their official
licensed games...If a developer wants an FIA license, then they're not
allowed to provide Internet-support...Why? No idea...

--
Kenneth Verburg
Webmaster/Editor-in-chief High Gear
http://www.simracingnews.com

Ronald Stoeh

GP3 Site... Spelling mistake or really bad planing.

by Ronald Stoeh » Wed, 15 Dec 1999 04:00:00


> Unfortunately the FIA doesn't allow for Internet-support with their official
> licensed games...If a developer wants an FIA license, then they're not
> allowed to provide Internet-support...Why? No idea...

Because they are a bunch of old farts, maybe? ;^)

"Computers? Games? Sims? Playing on the Internet? Huh?"

l8er
ronny

--
The box said "Windows 95 or better", so I installed LINUX!

          |\      _,,,---,,_        I want to die like my Grandfather,
   ZZZzz /,`.-'`'    -.  ;-;;,_              in his sleep.
        |,4-  ) )-,_. ,\ (  `'-'     Not like the people in his car,
       '---''(_/--'  `-'\_)            screaming their heads off!


rec.autos.simulators is a usenet newsgroup formed in December, 1993. As this group was always unmoderated there may be some spam or off topic articles included. Some links do point back to racesimcentral.net as we could not validate the original address. Please report any pages that you believe warrant deletion from this archive (include the link in your email). RaceSimCentral.net is in no way responsible and does not endorse any of the content herein.