>> I repeat: My T2 is running perfectly on a SBPro (Pentium 120)
>with:
>To this and many other comments like them (referring to Game cards on
>Pentiums) all I have to say is this...I bought a P166 recently, with the
>SB32PnP card. Played GP2 with joystick until my T2 showed up...then used that
>with the SB joystick port...all was (in my opinion) fine, until I got the T2
>F22 stick...couldn't get the F22 to calibrate, so I went to my local computer
>shop to get a game card...they were out of TM ACM, so I got the CH3 card.
>Used it, but didn't really see any difference. Then, yesterday, I recieved in
>the mail the T2 ACM card (I had forgotten I had ordered it from Chip/Bits). I
>installed that in the system in place of the CH card...WOW!
>I picked up, had to be, 2-3 seconds at Adelaide in GP2. Everything was so
>much smoother...the funny thing was, I didn't even think I had a problem with
>the SB32 port (and, really, I didn't have a "problem"), but what a difference
>that TM card made.
>Things will "run perfectly" as I was running everything perfectly...at least,
>everything was "running", but as I found out, not optimally.
>Just my 0.02 worth...
>John Wehman
using a TM ACM gamecard with one's T2 makes a huge difference in terms
of controller input finesse and overall car responsiveness.
Of course someone who hasn't tried this and therefore has no actual
basis of comparison other than the hypothetical, isn't going to either
appreciate this subtlety or acknowledge it. If others are content to
call mediocrity "perfection", who are we to attempt to enlighten them?
<SMILE>
*
*
*