rec.autos.simulators

OT: Gonzalo Rodriguez

Hena Hakkane

OT: Gonzalo Rodriguez

by Hena Hakkane » Thu, 16 Sep 1999 04:00:00





>>> monaco ? Spa ?

>>Heh, what about a certain quite serious accident at Silverstone?

>I wouldn't call a broken leg a serious injury. There are thousands of
>people who have the same injury who merely call it a slight accident and
>more inconvenient than anything else.

Actually Sid Watkins said that Schumi hit his head to the dash at 107mph,
enough to kill him. Also, people have died from leg wounds he had. (I have
the whole interview if interested)

I guess Schumi was very lucky ...

Hena

Steve Ferguso

OT: Gonzalo Rodriguez

by Steve Ferguso » Thu, 16 Sep 1999 04:00:00

: I wouldn't call a broken leg a serious injury. There are thousands of
: people who have the same injury who merely call it a slight accident and
: more inconvenient than anything else.

Have you ever had a major break?  If you have, then you had a good
experience, and you were lucky.  If you haven't, then you don't know what
you are talking about.  Long term complications of broken bones are
plentiful.  If the break involves on joint, you can count on srthritis in
your later years.  If you are an athlete, there is a good chance you will
cut short your career due to the degeneration of the joint.  If the
fracture doesn't involve a joint, then there is still a very real chance
of improper healing and re-fracture.  If you are incredibly unlucky, like
Ronnie Peterson, then a fairly benign fracture could result in a fat
embolism going off into your circulatory system and stopping your heart.
If the fracture is compound (ie. bone puncturing the skin, as is often the
case with high energy fractures like motor racing and skiing) then there
is damage and scarring to the muscles and tendons that surround the
fracture.  The physio related to recovering from a major fracture is not a
"minor inconvenience", nor is the loss of a whole season of motor racing,
skiing, football, rugby etc. in the athlete's already short career.

Been there, done that (fractured tibial plateau, patella, evulsed
ligaments, meniscal tear) and did not consider it trivial, nor did I
appreciate the loss of a rugby season.  I also don't like the fact that,
ten years later, my knees lack the range of motion they had pre-injury,
despite a very active lifestyle.  It bugged me so much I decided to do my
PhD on fracture healing and soft tissue damage. :)

OK, rant over. Don't underestimate the consequences of any injury to an
athlete.

Stephen

Meij

OT: Gonzalo Rodriguez

by Meij » Thu, 16 Sep 1999 04:00:00

I'm not talking about the effect of the damage on an "athlete" just that a
broken leg isn't a serious accident in the terms of danger to life. Yes
some can be but this wasn't. The man is alive, pretty much well and
recovering so stop making it out to be a tragedy. Gonzo, Senna,
Ratzenberger, Krosnoff, Sharp are tragedies, Schumacher, Fittipaldi,
Blundell and so on are not.

M



<SNIPPED A LOT OF MEDICAL INFO>

Meij

OT: Gonzalo Rodriguez

by Meij » Thu, 16 Sep 1999 04:00:00

Is he dead tho? No... was it life threatening? apparently not. Thus it's
not a serious accident compared to those suffered by other drivers.

M



Brent Arthur

OT: Gonzalo Rodriguez

by Brent Arthur » Thu, 16 Sep 1999 04:00:00



> > monaco ? Spa ?

> Heh, what about a certain quite serious accident at Silverstone?

> > McKafre De La Rosa



> > >These tracks would never be alowed in say F1 (don't gimme ***about
> > >F1 being boring... I agree, but at least the tracks are pretty safe.)

> Matt

> --
> ---------------------------------
> Matthew B. Knutsen

> The GPL Preservation Society
> http://www.racesimcentral.net/

> -- GPLEA Member --

> Cheek Racing Cars;
> http://www.racesimcentral.net/

1989 GERHARD BERGER was lucky to escape with his life after crashing
into the concrete retaining wall at Imola.
1994...5 years later, that exact unprotected conrete wall claims the
life of Ayrton Senna.....nothing was changed after Berger's
accident....had a barrier of tires been erected I strongly believe that
Senna would still be with us today.

Gonzalo's accident was tragic and no doubt an extremely odd scenario
unlike other incidents which should have been avoided.

Matthew Birger Knutse

OT: Gonzalo Rodriguez

by Matthew Birger Knutse » Thu, 16 Sep 1999 04:00:00


> 1989 GERHARD BERGER was lucky to escape with his life after crashing
> into the concrete retaining wall at Imola.
> 1994...5 years later, that exact unprotected conrete wall claims the
> life of Ayrton Senna.....nothing was changed after Berger's
> accident....had a barrier of tires been erected I strongly believe that
> Senna would still be with us today.

> Gonzalo's accident was tragic and no doubt an extremely odd scenario
> unlike other incidents which should have been avoided.

Yeah, true. But so was Krosnoff's. Personally, I have a spooky sensation
whenever I watch Monaco...I'm just waiting for the one accident where a car
climbs into the crowds...Patrick Tambay nearly managed this in 84 (?) With the
Beatrice Lola.

Matt

--
---------------------------------
Matthew B. Knutsen

The GPL Preservation Society
http://www.gpl.electra.no

-- GPLEA Member --

Cheek Racing Cars;
http://www.cheekracing.electra.no

Matthew Birger Knutse

OT: Gonzalo Rodriguez

by Matthew Birger Knutse » Thu, 16 Sep 1999 04:00:00


> Is he dead tho? No... was it life threatening? apparently not. Thus it's
> not a serious accident compared to those suffered by other drivers.

> M

Well....we're moving into the "what if" scenario here. What if Krosnoff's head
hadn't hit anything. He might have survived. Andretti, Fittipaldi,
Mansell..they could all have died at some point. When it comes to track
security, nothing can protect you 100%. Just look at Mika; had his Adelaide
shunt happened just a few years earlier, he would never have had the chance to
make that incredible comeback....
I'd consider any accident that puts one in hospital for a longer period of time
serious. Wasn't Ernie Irvan's Michigan accident serious? How about Karl
Wendlinger?
Just because they survived? This is a very fine line we're balancing on!

Matt



> >Actually Sid Watkins said that Schumi hit his head to the dash at 107mph,
> >enough to kill him. Also, people have died from leg wounds he had. (I have
> >the whole interview if interested)

> >I guess Schumi was very lucky ...

> >Hena

--
---------------------------------
Matthew B. Knutsen

The GPL Preservation Society
http://www.gpl.electra.no

-- GPLEA Member --

Cheek Racing Cars;
http://www.cheekracing.electra.no

Vinc

OT: Gonzalo Rodriguez

by Vinc » Thu, 16 Sep 1999 04:00:00

On Wed, 15 Sep 1999 14:06:04 GMT, Brent Arthurs


>1994...5 years later, that exact unprotected conrete wall claims the
>life of Ayrton Senna.....nothing was changed after Berger's
>accident....had a barrier of tires been erected I strongly believe that
>Senna would still be with us today.

Maybe, but it was a broken suspension arm that killed Senna, hitting
his head. The point is that the wall lets the car slide and slow down,
while the tyres in a similar point can trap the nose of the car,
breaking the legs of the pilot, like happened to Panis in Montreal.
Senna was very unlucky, because there were several accidents at the
Tamburello, Piquet (87), Berger (89), Alboreto and Patrese, and the
damage to the pilots were not so bad, considering the speed and the
type of crashes

--
---------------------------------------------------------------------

   Home-page : http://www.geocities.com/CapeCanaveral/Hangar/7917
    Il sito di ISF1mod : http://www.blissett.com/isf1/index.html
---------------------------------------------------------------------

david kar

OT: Gonzalo Rodriguez

by david kar » Thu, 16 Sep 1999 04:00:00

God, do we have to resurrect this yet again?  Ayrton was killed NOT by an
absence of impact dissipation material, but by a part of a suspension arm
penetrating his visor and then his head.  How might tires have lessened the
chance of a (somewhat fragile) suspension piece flying around?

Gerhard's chief danger was the fire--he was back racing within a month.
Again, not particularly related to an absence of tire barriers.

--David


> 1989 GERHARD BERGER was lucky to escape with his life after crashing
> into the concrete retaining wall at Imola.
> 1994...5 years later, that exact unprotected conrete wall claims the
> life of Ayrton Senna.....nothing was changed after Berger's
> accident....had a barrier of tires been erected I strongly believe that
> Senna would still be with us today.

> Gonzalo's accident was tragic and no doubt an extremely odd scenario
> unlike other incidents which should have been avoided.

Daniel Lichtenberge

OT: Gonzalo Rodriguez

by Daniel Lichtenberge » Fri, 17 Sep 1999 04:00:00

On Tue, 14 Sep 1999 14:34:02 +0100, Mike Buckley


>Seeing the replay before the race made me believe it would not have
>happened in F1 because of the extra safety measures.

Maybe, but also in F1 it took two dead drivers until they *really*
started extra safety measures. And we had a lot of luck in F1, too
(remember the horrible accidents of Hakkinen and Wendlinger some years
ago?).

Yes, maybe multiple tirewalls like in Eau Rouge (Spa) would have saved
Rodriguez. But afterwards it's always easy to see inappropriate safety
measures, and according to ESPN this was the first fatal accident in a
race weekend since the track opened in 1957...

Daniel

--
 ICQ UIN: 30333508
 http://www.topofgames.de || http://danielshome.cjb.net

Meij

OT: Gonzalo Rodriguez

by Meij » Fri, 17 Sep 1999 04:00:00




>> Is he dead tho? No... was it life threatening? apparently not. Thus
>> it's not a serious accident compared to those suffered by other
>> drivers.

>> M

>Well....we're moving into the "what if" scenario here. What if
>Krosnoff's head hadn't hit anything. He might have survived. Andretti,
>Fittipaldi, Mansell..they could all have died at some point. When it
>comes to track security, nothing can protect you 100%. Just look at
>Mika; had his Adelaide shunt happened just a few years earlier, he would
>never have had the chance to make that incredible comeback....
>I'd consider any accident that puts one in hospital for a longer period
>of time serious. Wasn't Ernie Irvan's Michigan accident serious? How
>about Karl Wendlinger?
>Just because they survived? This is a very fine line we're balancing on!

You're dealing in irrelevancies here Matt and it's not "what if" at all.
Schumacher was not seriously hurt. It is a fact. Irrefutable. Ernie Irvan
and Karl Wendlingers accidents were very serious because they were
extremely badly hurt in them so much so that doctors told them to be
pleased if they ever drove a *car* again, let alone a race car.

There is a tendancy for fans to spend too long debating what if rather
than what happened. My point was that Schumachers accident wasn't what
I'd call serious as there was no real threat to his life if we look at it
now. At the time I was as worried as anyone else but we have the benefit
of all the evidence now and he was virtually unscathed compared to what
would have happened 10 years ago.

M

Hena Hakkane

OT: Gonzalo Rodriguez

by Hena Hakkane » Fri, 17 Sep 1999 04:00:00


>There is a tendancy for fans to spend too long debating what if rather
>than what happened. My point was that Schumachers accident wasn't what
>I'd call serious as there was no real threat to his life if we look at it
>now.

That's not true according to Sid Watkins from dailyF1:

SCHUMACHER ACCIDENT FINDINGS EMERGE

Reports and findings surfacing from research over Michael Schumacher's
accident at the British Grand Prix have suggested the German could have been
killed by the impact.

F1 medical supremo Sid Watkins has revealed that the accident, which broke
Schumacher's right leg in two places, was severe enough to kill him. Watkins
was one of the first on the scene to attend to the double world champion
after he was removed from the***pit.

'When we saw him we understood exactly that he had a broken leg because it
was unnaturally deformed,' said Watkins. 'We were happier when we saw the
skin with no wounds.'

'He was suffering.

'Michael crashed his head against the***pit in a frontal way at 90 degrees
at 107 km/h. Enough to kill. His head hurtled with extreme *** but we
experimented on his head that our rules on safety were good because the
helmet was broken but the man was safe.

'We kept his 'head-keeper' (deformable foam type structure behind the driver
's head) because we'll study and experiment on it. In this way his accident
will be important for F1 and motorsport.

'We will have the results in late spring.'

As well as Watkins' accounts and discoveries, Italian photographer Alberto
Crippa, who was working at Stowe corner on July 12 when the accident
occurred, has also revealed his dramatic account of events.

'It was a terrible view,' said Crippa, who was standing just metres away
from the crash scene. 'I saw the car pointing straight to the borders of the
track in the middle of a cloud of blue smoke.

'Then, the crash was sudden, terrible, and loud. (The) first thing I
wondered was if he still (had) his legs. The car lost its front part under
the tyres and it was logical to think so. Then the second thought was for
his life.

'That direct and fast shunt gave me the thought he could be dead. I
understood he was alive because I heard him crying through the helmet.

'He was crying loud for the pain, but he was alive.

Amazingly, Crippa can also recall some words Schumacher shouted when he was
trying in vain to emerge from the***pit.

'He took the steering wheel away and tried to put his knees in the front
part of the***pit trying to come out from there. But while the marshalls
were coming running, he was shouting, "The leg! The leg.what a terrible
pain".

'The shouts were very loud so they were quite easy to understand.'

'While the marshalls were taking him away from the***pit Michael was
suffering and shouting again "Be careful be careful".

'But I knew that he was weeping tears of pain.'

Hena

Behind

OT: Gonzalo Rodriguez

by Behind » Fri, 17 Sep 1999 04:00:00

Strange that - I recall an interview with Jacques Villeneuve when he first came
to F1 - cannot recall what exactly he said but he voiced his concern over the
safety at Monaco - this from a man who likes to take a car to the limits!! (and
isn't it wonderful to watch!).

This thread is becoming a bit 'his accident was worse than his accident
because...' - please, let's stop this playground type argument - at the end of
the day drivers WILL die in F1, Cart, Champ, Rally, whatever - and continue to
do so. Some accidents will be freaks - Senna, some just unforeseeable. Perhaps
this is why the sport is loved. At the end of the day, most alternative Sundays
people can sit and watch some of the greatest drivers in the world risk their
all for a trophy (and the rest...!)
More will die and more will walk away from tremendous crashes with 'nere a
scratch, but this is what makes people 'do' motorsport and continue to do so.

Neil Rain

OT: Gonzalo Rodriguez

by Neil Rain » Fri, 17 Sep 1999 04:00:00


> >I have a spooky sensation
> >whenever I watch Monaco...I'm just waiting for the one accident where a car
> >climbs into the crowds...

> Strange that - I recall an interview with Jacques Villeneuve when he first came
> to F1 - cannot recall what exactly he said but he voiced his concern over the
> safety at Monaco - this from a man who likes to take a car to the limits!! (and
> isn't it wonderful to watch!).

> This thread is becoming a bit 'his accident was worse than his accident
> because...' - please, let's stop this playground type argument - at the end of
> the day drivers WILL die in F1, Cart, Champ, Rally, whatever - and continue to
> do so. Some accidents will be freaks - Senna, some just unforeseeable. Perhaps
> this is why the sport is loved. At the end of the day, most alternative Sundays
> people can sit and watch some of the greatest drivers in the world risk their
> all for a trophy (and the rest...!)
> More will die and more will walk away from tremendous crashes with 'nere a
> scratch, but this is what makes people 'do' motorsport and continue to do so.

Actually that's what makes me do GPL rather than trying it for real!
;-)
Meij

OT: Gonzalo Rodriguez

by Meij » Fri, 17 Sep 1999 04:00:00

Which part of "My point was that Schumachers accident wasn't what I'd
call serious as there was no real threat to his life if we look at it
now" was hard for you to understand. Schumacher was not killed nor was he
in danger of dying and I'm not talking what could have happened or what
we feared but what we *know* happened with retrospective sight.

M



<SNIPPED SOME IRRELEVANT CRAP>


rec.autos.simulators is a usenet newsgroup formed in December, 1993. As this group was always unmoderated there may be some spam or off topic articles included. Some links do point back to racesimcentral.net as we could not validate the original address. Please report any pages that you believe warrant deletion from this archive (include the link in your email). RaceSimCentral.net is in no way responsible and does not endorse any of the content herein.