that RSC has banned my acccount. I didn't violate any
rules. I emailed "webmaster", but no reply.
What is going on?
What is going on?
> What is going on?
abbakus:
>> What is going on?
> Indeed. Why does your header information match that of Jeff Reid?
My ip 68.231.201.198
Jeff Reid's ip 68.231.211.244
My header:
Path: news1.west.cox.net!west.cox.net!p01!fed1read03.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: rec.autos.simulators
Subject: Banned by RSC, no reason given
Lines: 9
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2670
X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Original
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2670
Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2005 04:26:42 -0700
NNTP-Posting-Host: 68.231.201.198
X-Trace: fed1read03 1126178801 68.231.201.198 (Thu, 08 Sep 2005 07:26:41 EDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 08 Sep 2005 07:26:41 EDT
Organization: Cox Communications
Xref: cox.net rec.autos.simulators:479231
X-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Sep 2005 07:26:43 EDT (news1.west.cox.net)
Jeff Reid's header:
Path: news1.west.cox.net!west.cox.net!filt01.cox.net!peer02.cox.net!cox.net!p01!f
Newsgroups: rec.autos.simulators
Subject: Re: Which series use Traction Control?
Lines: 31
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2670
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2670
X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Response
Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2005 19:50:37 -0700
NNTP-Posting-Host: 68.231.211.244
X-Trace: fed1read01 1125975032 68.231.211.244 (Mon, 05 Sep 2005 22:50:32 EDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 05 Sep 2005 22:50:32 EDT
Organization: Cox Communications
Xref: cox.net rec.autos.simulators:479049
X-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Sep 2005 22:50:36 EDT (news1.west.cox.net)
The numbers are close though, does this mean we live in the same
general area?
Ok, found one that did match, and one that didn't, is this something
Jeff or Cox Cable is doing? I'm going to call up Cox and see what's going
on, will post again later.
This one same as mine:
Path: news1.west.cox.net!west.cox.net!p01!fed1read03.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: rec.autos.simulators
Subject: Re: rFactor review
Lines: 18
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2670
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2670
X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Response
Date: Sun, 4 Sep 2005 05:13:14 -0700
NNTP-Posting-Host: 68.231.201.198
X-Trace: fed1read03 1125835987 68.231.201.198 (Sun, 04 Sep 2005 08:13:07 EDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 04 Sep 2005 08:13:07 EDT
Organization: Cox Communications
Xref: cox.net rec.autos.simulators:478892
X-Received-Date: Sun, 04 Sep 2005 08:13:08 EDT (news1.west.cox.net)
This one is isn't:
Path: news1.west.cox.net!west.cox.net!p01!fed1read01.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: rec.autos.simulators
Subject: Re: rFactor review
Lines: 13
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2670
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2670
X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Original
Date: Sun, 4 Sep 2005 08:24:57 -0700
NNTP-Posting-Host: 68.231.211.244
X-Trace: fed1read01 1125847492 68.231.211.244 (Sun, 04 Sep 2005 11:24:52 EDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 04 Sep 2005 11:24:52 EDT
Organization: Cox Communications
Xref: cox.net rec.autos.simulators:478914
X-Received-Date: Sun, 04 Sep 2005 11:24:53 EDT (news1.west.cox.net)
>>>I'm looking at this and it's not showing the same ...
>>>can Cox Cable be messing this up?
>>>My ip 68.231.201.198
>>>Jeff Reid's ip 68.231.211.244
> Ok, found one that did match, and one that didn't, is this something
> Jeff or Cox Cable is doing? I'm going to call up Cox and see what's going
> on, will post again later.
> This one same as mine:
> Path: news1.west.cox.net!west.cox.net!p01!fed1read03.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail
> Newsgroups: rec.autos.simulators
> Subject: Re: rFactor review
> Lines: 18
> X-Priority: 3
> X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
> X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2670
> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2670
> X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Response
> Date: Sun, 4 Sep 2005 05:13:14 -0700
> NNTP-Posting-Host: 68.231.201.198
> X-Trace: fed1read03 1125835987 68.231.201.198 (Sun, 04 Sep 2005 08:13:07 EDT)
> NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 04 Sep 2005 08:13:07 EDT
> Organization: Cox Communications
> Xref: cox.net rec.autos.simulators:478892
> X-Received-Date: Sun, 04 Sep 2005 08:13:08 EDT (news1.west.cox.net)
> This one is isn't:
> Path: news1.west.cox.net!west.cox.net!p01!fed1read01.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail
> Newsgroups: rec.autos.simulators
> Subject: Re: rFactor review
> Lines: 13
> X-Priority: 3
> X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
> X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2670
> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2670
> X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Original
> Date: Sun, 4 Sep 2005 08:24:57 -0700
> NNTP-Posting-Host: 68.231.211.244
> X-Trace: fed1read01 1125847492 68.231.211.244 (Sun, 04 Sep 2005 11:24:52 EDT)
> NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 04 Sep 2005 11:24:52 EDT
> Organization: Cox Communications
> Xref: cox.net rec.autos.simulators:478914
> X-Received-Date: Sun, 04 Sep 2005 11:24:53 EDT (news1.west.cox.net)
Not a conincidence. Apparenlty 68.31.201.198 is some type
of firewall ip (hundreds of users will appear to
have this same ip with the firewall option).
Sometimes non-firewall users get one of the firewall
ip's due to some bug. Anyway, they told me to power
cycle my cable modem, and now my ip is fixed again
back to 68.4.214.134.
Oh well, if there was an ip match, then that could
explain it, but you'd think that someone from RSC could
had responded and explained it.
Just checked it, it's fixed. From now on, I'll do
ipconfig check before going online to keep from
getting any more false accusations.
You'd think that RSC would be aware of firewalled ip's
though. Then again, since they provided no explanation,
it may have been something else. Also looking at some
older threads, Sirrocco claims that it was a different
player (not jeffr) at RSC that that was posting using
different accounts.
> Just checked it, it's fixed. From now on, I'll do
> ipconfig check before going online to keep from
> getting any more false accusations.
> You'd think that RSC would be aware of firewalled ip's
> though. Then again, since they provided no explanation,
> it may have been something else. Also looking at some
> older threads, Sirrocco claims that it was a different
> player (not jeffr) at RSC that that was posting using
> different accounts.
Hmmmm... bringing up being banned from RSC in RAS. Looks like Jeff.
Replying to oneself several times in one thread. Looks like Jeff.
IP addresses from a similar range, same ISP, same use of a hotmail account,
same newsreader. That certainly looks like it could be Jeff.
And really, does anyone think that someone who has made their FIRST usenet
post EVER under this name, on this subject, with all these similarities
ISN'T dear ol' Insane Jeffy who's now nym-shifting?
Dude, if RAS was a webforum you would've been banned long ago. The way you
act here does nothing but show everyone that you deserve any ban you get.
Start up your own webforum where you're the boss, or stay on topic here
about SIMULATORS and stop whining about RSC. And lastly, grow the hell up.
KenB
>>>now my ip is fixed again back to 68.4.214.134.
>>Just checked it, it's fixed. From now on, I'll do
>>ipconfig check before going online to keep from
>>getting any more false accusations.
>>You'd think that RSC would be aware of firewalled ip's
>>though. Then again, since they provided no explanation,
>>it may have been something else. Also looking at some
>>older threads, Sirrocco claims that it was a different
>>player (not jeffr) at RSC that that was posting using
>>different accounts.
> Hmmmm... bringing up being banned from RSC in RAS. Looks like Jeff.
> Replying to oneself several times in one thread. Looks like Jeff.
> IP addresses from a similar range, same ISP, same use of a hotmail account,
> same newsreader. That certainly looks like it could be Jeff.
> And really, does anyone think that someone who has made their FIRST usenet
> post EVER under this name, on this subject, with all these similarities
> ISN'T dear ol' Insane Jeffy who's now nym-shifting?
> Dude, if RAS was a webforum you would've been banned long ago. The way you
> act here does nothing but show everyone that you deserve any ban you get.
> Start up your own webforum where you're the boss, or stay on topic here
> about SIMULATORS and stop whining about RSC. And lastly, grow the hell up.
> KenB
>>> now my ip is fixed again back to 68.4.214.134.
>> Just checked it, it's fixed. From now on, I'll do
>> ipconfig check before going online to keep from
>> getting any more false accusations.
>> You'd think that RSC would be aware of firewalled ip's
>> though. Then again, since they provided no explanation,
>> it may have been something else. Also looking at some
>> older threads, Sirrocco claims that it was a different
>> player (not jeffr) at RSC that that was posting using
>> different accounts.
> Thanks for the info, Jeff.
> I'm Jeff, and so's my wife!
Beers and cheers
(uncle) Goy
"The Pits" http://www.theuspits.com/
"When two or more people are gathered together in my name,
they shall perform the Parrot Sketch..."
--Our Lord John Cleese--
>>I'm Jeff, and so's my wife!
> You get extra credits for the Monty Python reference, but I'm
> disappointed in the overall effort :)
> Actually, that was me disguised at Jeff.
Beers and cheers
(uncle) Goy
"The Pits" http://www.theuspits.com/
"When two or more people are gathered together in my name,
they shall perform the Parrot Sketch..."
--Our Lord John Cleese--