Could you PLEASE give us a percent-done number for the Nascar2 patch??
Just say 20% done, 50% done, 80% done?? I'm not asking for a date, so
you're not really flame-able if you don't make the date, people won't
know how long it takes to do 40% of the patch... WE (I) NEED TO KNOW!!!!
hehehe, please? Thanks,
Flame warDemand for NASCAR 2 patch progress becomes a flame war
A user asked Jim Sokoloff for a percentage-complete figure for the NASCAR Racing 2 patch. Sokoloff declined, explaining that patch work did not conflict with other projects, and many posters defended him. The thread turned into a long argument over whether N2 was 'unfinished', with a bug list from Dave Sparks' FAQ, and ended in personal insults between Eric Adam and Richard Walker.
With Jim Sokoloff (Papyrus)
Automated summary.
Just forget it hes not going to tell you.It shouldnt take that long
though.I mean there are allot of games out there that had allot worst bugs
than Nascar2 but they allready have patches out. I think Papy is to busy
working on that obsolete antique legends sim.I could care less about a 1967
era sim or what ever it is untill Nascar2 is fixed.
On Wed, 12 Mar 1997 21:16:22 -0600, David Otterness
>Could you PLEASE give us a percent-done number for the Nascar2 patch??
>Just say 20% done, 50% done, 80% done?? I'm not asking for a date, so
>you're not really flame-able if you don't make the date, people won't
>know how long it takes to do 40% of the patch... WE (I) NEED TO KNOW!!!!
>hehehe, please? Thanks,
Give Jim a break - the guy does a great job answering our questions.
In any project it ain't done until its done - just cross your legs and
exercise sphincter control until Papyrus say their next dose of
awesomeness is good and ready.
Quoted text (14 lines)
> On Wed, 12 Mar 1997 21:16:22 -0600, David Otterness > >Could you PLEASE give us a percent-done number for the Nascar2 patch?? > >Just say 20% done, 50% done, 80% done?? I'm not asking for a date, so > >you're not really flame-able if you don't make the date, people won't > >know how long it takes to do 40% of the patch... WE (I) NEED TO KNOW!!!! > >hehehe, please? Thanks, > Give Jim a break - the guy does a great job answering our questions. > In any project it ain't done until its done - just cross your legs and > exercise sphincter control until Papyrus say their next dose of > awesomeness is good and ready.Quoted text (11 lines)
> > Could you PLEASE give us a percent-done number for the Nascar2 patch?? > > Just say 20% done, 50% done, 80% done?? I'm not asking for a date, so > > you're not really flame-able if you don't make the date, people won't > > know how long it takes to do 40% of the patch... WE (I) NEED TO KNOW!!!! > > hehehe, please? Thanks, > Just forget it hes not going to tell you.It shouldnt take that long > though.I mean there are allot of games out there that had allot worst bugs > than Nascar2 but they allready have patches out. I think Papy is to busy > working on that obsolete antique legends sim.I could care less about a 1967 > era sim or what ever it is untill Nascar2 is fixed.On Sat, 15 Mar 1997 13:01:18 -0600, David Otterness
That's your opinion, and of course you're entitled to it.
I can point out though that the resources currently being utilized on
the NASCAR 2 patch are not conflicting with the other projects.
(Papyrus is too big now to play the game of software development like
8 year olds play soccer, with everyone running after the ball in a big
gaggle.)
The work on the patch is able to go on in parallel with the upcoming
projects.
---Jim Sokoloff, Papyrus
Quoted text (10 lines)
>> Just forget it hes not going to tell you.It shouldnt take that long >> though.I mean there are allot of games out there that had allot worst bugs >> than Nascar2 but they allready have patches out. I think Papy is to busy >> working on that obsolete antique legends sim.I could care less about a 1967 >> era sim or what ever it is untill Nascar2 is fixed. >I agree totally, but I see a trend forming here.. release a new game of >a different racing genre, forget about and ignore all the past >projects.. They shouldn't (IMO) even start the F1 sim until they fix the >bugs in N2, and ICR2, even though ICR2 is out of the question now..Enough of the BS Jim. Why skirt the issue? He asked for a ***ing %
On 16 Mar 1997 05:40:29 GMT, "Richard Manning" <richie15
>> The work on the patch is able to go on in parallel with the upcoming
>> projects.
>Enough of the BS Jim. Why skirt the issue? He asked for a ***ing %
My, my, could you send me a brochure from the latest Dale Carnegie
seminar you attended; I should probably attend one so I can be more
pleasant to deal with...
Why skirt the issue? Take the following multiple choice test (mark all
that apply)
a) It's not my job to announce release dates of our products or
patches.
b) That responsibility falls on management and PR at Papyrus and
Sierra.
c) They've elected to release no information regarding the release
date of the N2 patch at this time.
d) It's part of my job to respect that election.
How to calculate your score: Give yourself 25% for each answer you've
marked.
Hope you got a 100% done, uh I mean right.
---Jim Sokoloff, Papyrus
If you don't like it, don't play it.
I hardly think that N2's current very minor bugs detract much from the
sheer good fun to be had.
You got a bad dose of negative attitude, fella.
Bravo Jim,
It appears that some, just dont seem to get it.
--
John Twitchell
I'm lost and I've gone to look for myself.
> On 16 Mar 1997 05:40:29 GMT, "Richard Manning" <richie15
much snipped
> Enough of the BS Jim. Why skirt the issue? He asked for a ***ing %
Why dont you give Jim a break??? He's active on this Newsgroup on
his own time.....He's been quite a bit of help to the non-whiners
here...
In a sense Jim is a volunteer, and for those of us that have real
jobs, can appreciate the amount of extra effort it takes to
volunteer thier free time.
N2 has some bugs but is an improvement over N1... and I would imagine
a lot of work is being put in the "patch" so that when the NRO goes
online it will be as smooth and bug free as possible. If you don't
like N2 then take it up with Sierra Customer Support.. Not Jim.
--
::::::::#########::::::::::David Burton aka Vetteracer
:########################::http://www.rust.net/~daland
########################:::"You have to first finish,
:::::::#########:::::::::::before finishing first"
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
Looks like you don't get it.If the customers don't get it then Papy don't
get.Got it!
Quoted text (9 lines)
> >Well, if their next dose of "awesomeness" is as buggy as their current > >dose of "awesomeness", I don't think it'll be too "awesome".. > If you don't like it, don't play it. > I hardly think that N2's current very minor bugs detract much from the > sheer good fun to be had. > You got a bad dose of negative attitude, fella.Finished or no, it's worth a damn sight more than 60 bucks.
Racing sims are the only computer software that see me constantly
returning to the PC for more. Comparing them to other programs or other
leisure activities the top three sims are all incredible value for money
<g>
I suggest that you and all the other whiners look at what you have got,
rather than bemoaning what you do not have.
Cheers,
Richard
>Finished or no, it's worth a damn sight more than 60 bucks.
>I suggest that you and all the other whiners look at what you have got,
>rather than bemoaning what you do not have.
I second that emotion !
Quoted text (13 lines)
> > Enough of the BS Jim. Why skirt the issue? He asked for a ***ing % > Why dont you give Jim a break??? He's active on this Newsgroup on > his own time.....He's been quite a bit of help to the non-whiners > here... > In a sense Jim is a volunteer, and for those of us that have real > jobs, can appreciate the amount of extra effort it takes to > volunteer thier free time. > N2 has some bugs but is an improvement over N1... and I would imagine > a lot of work is being put in the "patch" so that when the NRO goes > online it will be as smooth and bug free as possible. If you don't > like N2 then take it up with Sierra Customer Support.. Not Jim. > --Quoted text (9 lines)
> >Well, if their next dose of "awesomeness" is as buggy as their current > >dose of "awesomeness", I don't think it'll be too "awesome".. > If you don't like it, don't play it. > I hardly think that N2's current very minor bugs detract much from the > sheer good fun to be had. > You got a bad dose of negative attitude, fella.Quoted text (28 lines)
>BUG LIST >======== >- Install corrupts Internet Explorer setup >- Can't load setups with minimal install >- No qualifying setups for some tracks with Windows install >- AI pitting problems at Atlanta after a yellow >- F1 screen doesn't update if F1 is pressed before first lap is complete >- Spotter says "Stay low" constantly during pace lap when spotter > level is set to "Full" >- Spotter stops calling out lap times if you hit the wall just before crossing > the start/finish line >- Spotter goes crazy after a big wreck, saying "Go low" "Go high" constantly >- Spotter gives bogus "Pass the #nn car" message after exiting the pits >- LF Camber is off in setup screen when set to 0.0 >- Weight distribution is displayed incorrectly after certain setup changes >- Frame rate is awful at Martinsville >- Screen options are reset to SVGA before each race >- Noticeable pause coming out of Turn 4 on some tracks >- Dialup player starts inside an AI car in Multiplayer >- Player's car towed off track without warning in Multiplayer >- Dialup player cannot tow properly in Multiplayer >- Dialup player hangs when max opponents set to 38 in Multiplayer >- Dialup player locks up when exiting race in Multiplayer >- Some DSVD modems don't work because baud rate is limited to 19.2 >- Get "Can't initialize modem" or "Can't initialize IPX card" when > the MULTI.LST file is not present >There's the bug list, any more ***ings about N2's "very minor" bugs???No one is saying its not a good sim.But when your in the pits after running
400 laps and some idiot AI car rams you and tears your car up.Its things
like that that gets me.It doesnt happen sometimes its every time.Same thing
at tally.I like the game I play it all the time.last heard though its still
a free internet and I am free to express my feeling on it if I feel like
it.I am a customer to you know.
crossing
> > the start/finish line
> >- Spotter goes crazy after a big wreck, saying "Go low" "Go high" constantly
> >- Spotter gives bogus "Pass the #nn car" message after exiting the pits
> >- LF Camber is off in setup screen when set to 0.0
> >- Weight distribution is displayed incorrectly after certain setup changes
Quoted text (10 lines)
> >BUG LIST > >======== > >- Install corrupts Internet Explorer setup > >- Can't load setups with minimal install > >- No qualifying setups for some tracks with Windows install > >- AI pitting problems at Atlanta after a yellow > >- F1 screen doesn't update if F1 is pressed before first lap is complete > >- Spotter says "Stay low" constantly during pace lap when spotter > > level is set to "Full" > >- Spotter stops calling out lap times if you hit the wall just beforeQuoted text (28 lines)
> >- Frame rate is awful at Martinsville > >- Screen options are reset to SVGA before each race > >- Noticeable pause coming out of Turn 4 on some tracks > >- Dialup player starts inside an AI car in Multiplayer > >- Player's car towed off track without warning in Multiplayer > >- Dialup player cannot tow properly in Multiplayer > >- Dialup player hangs when max opponents set to 38 in Multiplayer > >- Dialup player locks up when exiting race in Multiplayer > >- Some DSVD modems don't work because baud rate is limited to 19.2 > >- Get "Can't initialize modem" or "Can't initialize IPX card" when > > the MULTI.LST file is not present > >There's the bug list, any more ***ings about N2's "very minor" bugs??? > That's It??? Wow, I thought from the way guys were talking that there > were alot more bugs than that. Heck, that wouldn't even fill a page on > my note pad. Considering the thousands upon thousands of lines of code > they got in there in addition to the fact that it must work with many > different software and hardware configurations, I'd have to say that > list ain't all that bad for the pre patched version. BTW, Sierra's (or > Microsoft IExplorer's) install problem has been fixed. > I'd like to see a patch and some improvements too, but I must admit that > they have done a great job with auto racing sims so far. > Member - Hawaii Ace League http://www.dithots.org/hal> > No, he has a bad dose of negative attitude in his wallet for paying sixty
Well let's see what I have Oh yes,an unfinished game is what I have.Every
one doesn't have daddy there to shell out the bucks every time baby boy
starts crying.
Quoted text (14 lines)
> >bucks for an unfinished game,fella. > Finished or no, it's worth a damn sight more than 60 bucks. > Racing sims are the only computer software that see me constantly > returning to the PC for more. Comparing them to other programs or other > leisure activities the top three sims are all incredible value for money > <g> > I suggest that you and all the other whiners look at what you have got, > rather than bemoaning what you do not have. > Cheers, > RichardNo program is ever finished, ask any programmer. There are always things you
want to add, change, tweak, etc. So crying "I bought an unfinished program" is
true 100% of the time.
Whenever someone in the Quake newsgroups (or in efnet #quake) asks when an
upcoming patch/program/whatever will be released, the standard answer is "two
weeks." So just keep telling yourself you'll see the N2 patch in two weeks, so
when it comes out you'll be pleasantly suprised.
--
The email address in the header is fake. To send me mail, use
mjhaidu(AT)ilstu.edu (I typed it that way so my address isn't anywhere
in the message.) If that's too difficult, don't bother writing me.
>No one is saying its not a good sim.But when your in the pits after
>running 400 laps and some idiot AI car rams you and tears your car
>up. Its things like that that gets me.It doesnt happen sometimes its
>every time
Hmm... I haven't had time to run long races yet. That would bug me too
(if it happened often). Your point is well taken. I had the same problem
with Bill Elliot's Nascar Challenge. It was so frustrating that the game
wasn't worth playing.
Yes, I agree 100% (except the internet is not free for me<G>). I am
sorry if I gave the impression that I thought people shouldn't speak
thier minds. I was just posting my opinion, which BTW, is subject to
change without notice ;-)
Member Hawaii Ace League http://www.dithots.org/hal
Yes, it's a free internet, speech-wise, but you don't have to be an
*** about it. (referring to your response to Richard Walker).
And whether you like it or not, Papyrus does not owe you or anyone
else a patch. The "unfinished" game was quite finished by any
reasonable standard you wish to apply, ie the ***you get from any
other software manufacturer. You are, of course, free to demand a
refund as a less than satisfied customer, and it is certainly in
Papyrus' best interest to release a patch, but no one owes you a patch,
and you don't have to be an ***.
Just my $.02.
--Marcus
<snip>
Quoted text (20 lines)
>> > No, he has a bad dose of negative attitude in his wallet for paying >sixty >> >bucks for an unfinished game,fella. >> Finished or no, it's worth a damn sight more than 60 bucks. >> Racing sims are the only computer software that see me constantly >> returning to the PC for more. Comparing them to other programs or other >> leisure activities the top three sims are all incredible value for money >> <g> >> I suggest that you and all the other whiners look at what you have got, >> rather than bemoaning what you do not have. >> Cheers, >> Richard >Well let's see what I have Oh yes,an unfinished game is what I have.Every >one doesn't have daddy there to shell out the bucks every time baby boy >starts crying.Hi Marcus,
Your 2 cents are noted. I tend to disagree that we are not owed a
patch to fix any features of NCR2 that do not match those advertised
or claimed. Things like the lack of a save game feature have been
left out and have been requested by the users. No they dont owe us
that feature.
But using ICR2 as an example, before the patch (that took almost 12
months to arrive) the game was unplayable if you wanted to race with
yellow flags on. That made the game pretty shoddy to me. It sat on
the shelf. If we accepted products if they are measured by the worst
***from any other standards .. then we are not getting what we paid
for nor expected. As you state:
I think the people in this NG sometimes forget how great these
simulations are. I know nothing about programming and have
admiration for people who can put me in a racing car to race the
circuits of the world. But an acceptable commercial standard must be
maintained. Nothing less and nothing more. You should get what you
were promised.
Sincerely,
Craig
******************************************************************************
[link lost in import: /~hoppy1]
IVL Toys-R-Us #43 Pontiac - Rick Higbee Motorsports
Member of Christian Auto Racing Evangelism - CARE
[link lost in import: /~carroll/care.htm]
******************************************************************************
Whoa so many flames...makes me wanna ask for a weird patch...how about a
patch for a broken header so we can get some flame on
deceleration...ok...there is my 2 cent worth
> Whoa so many flames...makes me wanna ask for a weird patch...how about a
> patch for a broken header so we can get some flame on
> deceleration...ok...there is my 2 cent worth
lol yea and how about a second ignition box/ignition switch so I can
switch ignitions during a race when one of them blows!
ahhhh of course I'm just kidding.......
--
::::::::#########::::::::::David Burton aka Vetteracer
:########################::http://www.rust.net/~daland
########################:::"You have to first finish,
:::::::#########:::::::::::before finishing first"
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
You must work for Sierra.If you don't mind could you keep your foul mouth
lanquage to yourself?Last time I looked the Internet is still a place I can
express my opinions freely.If you don't like it don't read my post.Where
Richard Walker is concerned a smart remark for a smart remark.I get sick
and tired of you hollier than now people who think you own this
newsgroup.this news group is free and until otherwise I will keep
expressing my opinion on shoddy workmanship as much as I want .
****************************************************************************
**
> [link lost in import: /~hoppy1]
> IVL Toys-R-Us #43 Pontiac - Rick Higbee Motorsports
> Member of Christian Auto Racing Evangelism - CARE
> [link lost in import: /~carroll/care.htm]
****************************************************************************
**
Quoted text (44 lines)
> >Yes, it's a free internet, speech-wise, but you don't have to be an > >*** about it. (referring to your response to Richard Walker). > >And whether you like it or not, Papyrus does not owe you or anyone > >else a patch. The "unfinished" game was quite finished by any > >reasonable standard you wish to apply, ie the ***you get from any > >other software manufacturer. You are, of course, free to demand a > >refund as a less than satisfied customer, and it is certainly in > >Papyrus' best interest to release a patch, but no one owes you a patch, > >and you don't have to be an ***. > >Just my $.02. > >--Marcus > Hi Marcus, > Your 2 cents are noted. I tend to disagree that we are not owed a > patch to fix any features of NCR2 that do not match those advertised > or claimed. Things like the lack of a save game feature have been > left out and have been requested by the users. No they dont owe us > that feature. > But using ICR2 as an example, before the patch (that took almost 12 > months to arrive) the game was unplayable if you wanted to race with > yellow flags on. That made the game pretty shoddy to me. It sat on > the shelf. If we accepted products if they are measured by the worst > ***from any other standards .. then we are not getting what we paid > for nor expected. As you state: > >The "unfinished" game was quite finished by any > >reasonable standard you wish to apply, ie the ***you get from any > >other software manufacturer. > I think the people in this NG sometimes forget how great these > simulations are. I know nothing about programming and have > admiration for people who can put me in a racing car to race the > circuits of the world. But an acceptable commercial standard must be > maintained. Nothing less and nothing more. You should get what you > were promised. > Sincerely, > CraigOnce again what I have is an unfinished product.
> >Finished or no, it's worth a damn sight more than 60 bucks.
> >I suggest that you and all the other whiners look at what you have got,
> >rather than bemoaning what you do not have.
> I second that emotion !
Quoted text (53 lines)
>> >Well, if their next dose of "awesomeness" is as buggy as their current >> >dose of "awesomeness", I don't think it'll be too "awesome".. >> If you don't like it, don't play it. >> I hardly think that N2's current very minor bugs detract much from the >> sheer good fun to be had. >> You got a bad dose of negative attitude, fella. >Here's a list of some of the so-called "minor" bugs in N2, and I know of >some more.. Maybe if you have a 4837 mhz computer, you might not >experience akk the bugs, but all of us aren't rich and spoiled like you >Mr. Barham... >from Dave Sparks' Nascar 2 FAQ at >[link lost in import] >Thanks Dave... >BUG LIST >======== >- Install corrupts Internet Explorer setup >- Can't load setups with minimal install >- No qualifying setups for some tracks with Windows install >- AI pitting problems at Atlanta after a yellow >- F1 screen doesn't update if F1 is pressed before first lap is > complete >- Spotter says "Stay low" constantly during pace lap when spotter > level is set to "Full" >- Spotter stops calling out lap times if you hit the wall just > before crossing the start/finish line >- Spotter goes crazy after a big wreck, saying "Go low" "Go high" > constantly >- Spotter gives bogus "Pass the #nn car" message after exiting > the pits >- LF Camber is off in setup screen when set to 0.0 >- Weight distribution is displayed incorrectly after certain > setup changes >- Frame rate is awful at Martinsville >- Screen options are reset to SVGA before each race >- Noticeable pause coming out of Turn 4 on some tracks >- Dialup player starts inside an AI car in Multiplayer >- Player's car towed off track without warning in Multiplayer >- Dialup player cannot tow properly in Multiplayer >- Dialup player hangs when max opponents set to 38 in Multiplayer >- Dialup player locks up when exiting race in Multiplayer >- Some DSVD modems don't work because baud rate is limited to 19.2 >- Get "Can't initialize modem" or "Can't initialize IPX card" when > the MULTI.LST file is not present >There's the bug list, any more ***ings about N2's "very minor" bugs???> >> >Well, if their next dose of "awesomeness" is as buggy as their current
and any
> of the comm ports are active.
> - no anti-aliasing when using a Rendition-based card
> - no print screen option with Rendition-based cards.
> --- Frank ---
AI goes crazy a Tally on the pace lap car lines up beside the pace car
after he does 150 MPH backwards.
After caution comes out lap cars do about 40 MPH around the track blocking
you.
Quoted text (54 lines)
> >> >dose of "awesomeness", I don't think it'll be too "awesome".. > >> If you don't like it, don't play it. > >> I hardly think that N2's current very minor bugs detract much from the > >> sheer good fun to be had. > >> You got a bad dose of negative attitude, fella. > >Here's a list of some of the so-called "minor" bugs in N2, and I know of > >some more.. Maybe if you have a 4837 mhz computer, you might not > >experience akk the bugs, but all of us aren't rich and spoiled like you > >Mr. Barham... > >from Dave Sparks' Nascar 2 FAQ at > >[link lost in import] > >Thanks Dave... > >BUG LIST > >======== > >- Install corrupts Internet Explorer setup > >- Can't load setups with minimal install > >- No qualifying setups for some tracks with Windows install > >- AI pitting problems at Atlanta after a yellow > >- F1 screen doesn't update if F1 is pressed before first lap is > > complete > >- Spotter says "Stay low" constantly during pace lap when spotter > > level is set to "Full" > >- Spotter stops calling out lap times if you hit the wall just > > before crossing the start/finish line > >- Spotter goes crazy after a big wreck, saying "Go low" "Go high" > > constantly > >- Spotter gives bogus "Pass the #nn car" message after exiting > > the pits > >- LF Camber is off in setup screen when set to 0.0 > >- Weight distribution is displayed incorrectly after certain > > setup changes > >- Frame rate is awful at Martinsville > >- Screen options are reset to SVGA before each race > >- Noticeable pause coming out of Turn 4 on some tracks > >- Dialup player starts inside an AI car in Multiplayer > >- Player's car towed off track without warning in Multiplayer > >- Dialup player cannot tow properly in Multiplayer > >- Dialup player hangs when max opponents set to 38 in Multiplayer > >- Dialup player locks up when exiting race in Multiplayer > >- Some DSVD modems don't work because baud rate is limited to 19.2 > >- Get "Can't initialize modem" or "Can't initialize IPX card" when > > the MULTI.LST file is not present > >There's the bug list, any more ***ings about N2's "very minor" bugs??? > - Joystick doesn't work within sim when using Windows 95 OEM B version: Once again what I have is an unfinished product.
All too true, but a damn fine one at that! I hope you are not using DOS
or Win3.x or Win95 or Netscape or IExplorer or, well just about any
software. Come to think of it, even your motherboard and BIOS should be
considered. If one wants to be totally truthful, all of these items are
"unfinished" products. Some get fixed with patches, while with others,
one must buy completely new upgrades, or even switch products all
together.
Now, don't get me wrong. I want the things that are "broken" in N2 to
be fixed (unlike ICR2 or even N1* -- which will never have all of their
broken parts fixed). I am sure that even the future patches of N2 won't
fix everything, it's the nature of the beast. But, I am still
optimistic that the majority of things that Papyrus can fix in N2, will
be fixed.
Patience! A long and grueling 500 mile race is not won at the drop of
the green flag. It takes time, patience, some tweaking, and sometimes
good fortune to finally be the first to see the checkered. Try taking
using this attitude for awhile, while we await the first N2 patch.
(* Oops, can throw in WorldCircuit/GP1 and GP2 in their also.)
--
**************************** Michael E. Carver *************************
Upside out, or inside down...False alarm the only game in town.
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=<[ /./. [- < ]>=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
If your daddy can't buy you a game when you start crying you could always
stop freeloading & earn your own way in life. ;-)
Cheers,
Richard
AAAAAHHHH did the wittle baby get mad ?Don't cry now.
> >Well let's see what I have Oh yes,an unfinished game is what I have.Every
Quoted text (8 lines)
> >one doesn't have daddy there to shell out the bucks every time baby boy > >starts crying. > If your daddy can't buy you a game when you start crying you could always > stop freeloading & earn your own way in life. ;-) > Cheers, > RichardI think I have an unfinished flame here. Come on, surely you can do
better than that. I'm not very happy at paying my ISP only to get such a
poor, incomplete flame. Just what is Usenet coming to ;-))
Cheers,
Richard
Yeah! This happens all the time! Don't even try a 100% race at Dega' you
will throw your computer out the window in frustration!
Oh yes little Richie Walker made me cry.Just like your mother was crying
last night but that was from pleasure.
Quoted text (8 lines)
> >AAAAAHHHH did the wittle baby get mad ?Don't cry now. > I think I have an unfinished flame here. Come on, surely you can do > better than that. I'm not very happy at paying my ISP only to get such a > poor, incomplete flame. Just what is Usenet coming to ;-)) > Cheers, > RichardOh, Eric, you're SUCH a wag! Haven't heard that since my school days.
Must make you feel really "***" to make such a jibe.
Besides which, my mother quite possibly was crying with pleasure last
night - haven't you heard that *** prowess is hereditary? ;-) Can't
for the life of me think why that should concern you though.
Come on, if you really must flame me (and for some reason you seem to
need to) please try and come up with something worth reading. Otherwise
crawl back into the swamp and come back when you have learnt to behave in
*** society.
Cheers,
Richard


































