I don't agree with you Neo. Things did change. What changed is the way you
have to set up a car before it runs a decent lap. After having learned how
to do this in F1RS I turned to MGPRS2. First of all, all my setups in F1RS
lacked a decent grip in the front. Also, with aids off I could hardly keep
the cars on the track, even after finding decent setups in general. But it's
a game, as is F1RS and it is in no way true Formula 1. But if you ask me
which one is more realistic, than from the setup point of view I would say
F1RS is the better one (although both have weird characteristics).And if you
wish, you can get a 1999 race in F1RS as well.
The only thing I would call an negative aspect is the graphics thing. MGPRS2
runs at 800*600, but F1RS only uses 640*400. The latter is a shame because
my videocard has much improved drivers for 800*600, not for standard
VGA-resolution.
But in the end, if you have to buy the game, i think there's not much of a
choise. F1RS is not available anymore in any shop for a long time (accept in
a dump-shop maybe). MGPRS2 is the cheap version now, since somewhere at the
end of this year there will be a follow-up by Ubisoft, as I've been told.
Advice: copy it from friend ? Take F1RS. Have to buyt: not much choise,
MGPRS2.
scrcs
F1 Racing Simulation versus Monaco GP Racing Simulation 2
A user asked whether Ubisoft's F1RS or MGPRS2 was more satisfying. Opinions split: ymenard preferred F1RS but called both mediocre, while Neo, Iain Mackenzie and Shumi preferred MGPRS2's setups and physics, especially with anti-spin enabled or brake help off. The Unofficial MGPRS2 site's lockout of Netscape users was also discussed.
Automated summary.
Hello all,
I'm interested in general impressions from people who have run both F1RS
and MGPRS2.
Aside from the obvious graphics improvement in MGPRS2 (and you may want
to debate this, too...8^)...), which delivered the more satisfying
racing experience for you? ...and has anyone raced MGPRS2 on the
Internet? What did you think? Did it work? How's the latency?
I'm looking at current F1 sims and I'd be glad of any input to help me
make a choice.
Thanks,
Kim Price
P. S. I'm using J. P.'s account to post this. We've been racing GPL on his
LAN tonight.
Kim Price
"J. P. Hovercraft" wrote:
Quoted text (16 lines)
> Hello all, > > I'm interested in general impressions from people who have run both F1RS > and MGPRS2. > > Aside from the obvious graphics improvement in MGPRS2 (and you may want > to debate this, too...8^)...), which delivered the more satisfying > racing experience for you? ...and has anyone raced MGPRS2 on the > Internet? What did you think? Did it work? How's the latency? > > I'm looking at current F1 sims and I'd be glad of any input to help me > make a choice. > > Thanks, > > Kim Price"J. P. Hovercraft" <[email hidden]> wrote
> Aside from the obvious graphics improvement in MGPRS2 (and you may want
> to debate this, too...8^)...), which delivered the more satisfying
> racing experience for you? ...and has anyone raced MGPRS2 on the
> Internet? What did you think? Did it work? How's the latency?
I suggest F1RS for a better experience, but it doesn't have any real
multiplayer racing implemented in it. Meanwhile, some would say that MGPRS2
has a much less satisfying racing (both are poor, but MGPRS2 is mediocre to
my eyes), but still it has a online racing system that isn't really good
neither.
If you want Net racing, there is no current F1 game that is axed as much as
Papyrus titles for it.
--
-- Fran�ois M�nard <ymenard>
-- May the Downforce be with you...
"People think it must be fun to be a super genius, but they don't realise
how hard it is to put up with all the idiots in the world."
[This followup was posted to rec.autos.simulators and a copy was sent to
the cited author.]
In article <[email hidden]>, [email hidden] says...
This newsgroup has discussed this issue in quite some detail many times
in the past, but as it happens, I prefer Monaco Grand Prix Racing
Simulation 2 far more than F1 Racing Simulator. It may not have the
official license, but it's easy to download the latest carsets from the
internet.
The graphics in MGPRS2 are an improvement over F1RS, but not by very
much.
In fact, very little has changed in the sim overall. Besides a few more
graphical options and updated tracks, there really isn't much else to
encourage you to buy this title over F1RS, except that it is still a
better product.
And selling for around �12 these days, you'd be nuts not to purchase it.
Neo
Quoted text (12 lines)
> Hello all, > > I'm interested in general impressions from people who have run both F1RS > and MGPRS2. > > Aside from the obvious graphics improvement in MGPRS2 (and you may want > to debate this, too...8^)...), which delivered the more satisfying > racing experience for you? ...and has anyone raced MGPRS2 on the > Internet? What did you think? Did it work? How's the latency? > > I'm looking at current F1 sims and I'd be glad of any input to help me > make a choice.Here is my copy of MGPRS that is now on ebay.
http://cgi.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=255217799
Pepp
Quoted text (16 lines)
>Hello all, >I'm interested in general impressions from people who have run both F1RS >and MGPRS2. >Aside from the obvious graphics improvement in MGPRS2 (and you may want >to debate this, too...8^)...), which delivered the more satisfying >racing experience for you? ...and has anyone raced MGPRS2 on the >Internet? What did you think? Did it work? How's the latency? >I'm looking at current F1 sims and I'd be glad of any input to help me >make a choice. >Thanks, >Kim PriceI really don't understand this debate at all!
MGPRS2 is better than F1RS in every respect - graphics (higher res),
physics, AI and setups particularly. The way the setup options changed the
cars in F1RS was plain silly, but in MGPRS2 they are much more realistic.
What you have to realise is that all F1RS setups have to be dumped if
playing MGPRS2 because the cars react in a very different way.
Go for MGPRS2 with the last patch and all the addons from the 'Unofficial'
site.
Iain
In article <Ui7o4.72898$[email hidden]>,
[email hidden] says...
=>I noticed the same thing about Anti-Spin. Turn it off and it's a totally
=>different game.
=>
=>Abandon Ubi Logic and deny to subscribe to the "all helps off is the most
=>realistic setting" and you'll have some fun with it.
=>
=>I even made the "Expert" level at the RS2League with Anti-Spin on, and
=>everyone loves it a lot more. It's more intuitive as a whole (although still
=>not the best physics).
=>
=>In all... I like RS2 for some fun in a modern F1 car until the new ones come
=>out from EA and Geoff.
=>
=>If you decide to race online... check out : www.rs2league.com and have a few
=>rounds.
=>
=>Cheers,
=>
=>Shumi
=>
=>David Karr <[email hidden]> wrote in message
=>news:87qgjo$prb$[email hidden]...
=>> You know, when that notorious and famed sim (G_L) came out, I found MGPRS2
=>> to be rather dull (canned spins, etc.)
=>>
=>> BUT--not too terribly long ago, I went back and did a few things which
=>have
=>> changed my opinion a bit. I raised the steering ratio to around 16-18
=>> degrees in all setups & I turned off the brake help.
=>>
=>> I've left the wheelspin help on (it's just too, too sensitive w/o it), and
=>> for now have left the anti-skid help on (because I'm too, too stupid)--and
=>> believe it or not, it's a different game from what I had remembered. I
=>have
=>> even caught and corrected a few of those canned spins!
=>>
=>> And there's an ultra-cool FF patch out that adds some serious tactile
=>> feedback.
I have an OEM copy of F1RS for sale. There is no manual, but one is
included on the disc. Make me an offer.
You know, when that notorious and famed sim (G_L) came out, I found MGPRS2
to be rather dull (canned spins, etc.)
BUT--not too terribly long ago, I went back and did a few things which have
changed my opinion a bit. I raised the steering ratio to around 16-18
degrees in all setups & I turned off the brake help.
I've left the wheelspin help on (it's just too, too sensitive w/o it), and
for now have left the anti-skid help on (because I'm too, too stupid)--and
believe it or not, it's a different game from what I had remembered. I have
even caught and corrected a few of those canned spins!
And there's an ultra-cool FF patch out that adds some serious tactile
feedback.
--DK
"Iain Mackenzie" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:87pt1j$ik0$[email hidden]...
> I really don't understand this debate at all!
> MGPRS2 is better than F1RS in every respect - graphics (higher res),
> physics, AI and setups particularly. The way the setup options changedthe
you
> > have to set up a car before it runs a decent lap. After having learnedhow
> > to do this in F1RS I turned to MGPRS2. First of all, all my setups inF1RS
> > lacked a decent grip in the front. Also, with aids off I could hardlykeep
> > the cars on the track, even after finding decent setups in general. But
> it's
> > a game, as is F1RS and it is in no way true Formula 1. But if you ask me
> > which one is more realistic, than from the setup point of view I wouldsay
> > F1RS is the better one (although both have weird characteristics).And if
> you
> > wish, you can get a 1999 race in F1RS as well.
> > The only thing I would call an negative aspect is the graphics thing.
> MGPRS2
> > runs at 800*600, but F1RS only uses 640*400. The latter is a shamebecause
> > my videocard has much improved drivers for 800*600, not for standard
> > VGA-resolution.
> > But in the end, if you have to buy the game, i think there's not much ofa
> > choise. F1RS is not available anymore in any shop for a long time(accept
> in
> > a dump-shop maybe). MGPRS2 is the cheap version now, since somewhere at
> the
> > end of this year there will be a follow-up by Ubisoft, as I've beentold.
Quoted text (10 lines)
> cars in F1RS was plain silly, but in MGPRS2 they are much more realistic. > What you have to realise is that all F1RS setups have to be dumped if > playing MGPRS2 because the cars react in a very different way. > Go for MGPRS2 with the last patch and all the addons from the 'Unofficial' > site. > Iain > > scrcs <[email hidden]> wrote in message > news:87mf3o$btc$[email hidden]... > > I don't agree with you Neo. Things did change. What changed is the wayQuoted text (13 lines)
> > Advice: copy it from friend ? Take F1RS. Have to buyt: not much choise, > > MGPRS2. > > > > scrcs > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >On Mon, 07 Feb 2000 04:00:54 GMT, "ymenard" <[email hidden]>
wrote:
What's better about F1RS than MGPRS2, besides an official license?
Neo
Quoted text (12 lines)
>"J. P. Hovercraft" <[email hidden]> wrote >> Aside from the obvious graphics improvement in MGPRS2 (and you may want >> to debate this, too...8^)...), which delivered the more satisfying >> racing experience for you? ...and has anyone raced MGPRS2 on the >> Internet? What did you think? Did it work? How's the latency? > > >I suggest F1RS for a better experience, but it doesn't have any real >multiplayer racing implemented in it. Meanwhile, some would say that MGPRS2 >has a much less satisfying racing (both are poor, but MGPRS2 is mediocre to >my eyes), but still it has a online racing system that isn't really good >neither.On Mon, 7 Feb 2000 13:48:58 +0100, "scrcs" <[email hidden]> wrote:
But the change in car physics is more of a tweak than an actual
'change'.
F1RS is almost undriveable, I agree.
Neo
Quoted text (9 lines)
>I don't agree with you Neo. Things did change. What changed is the way you >have to set up a car before it runs a decent lap. After having learned how >to do this in F1RS I turned to MGPRS2. First of all, all my setups in F1RS >lacked a decent grip in the front. Also, with aids off I could hardly keep >the cars on the track, even after finding decent setups in general. But it's >a game, as is F1RS and it is in no way true Formula 1. But if you ask me >which one is more realistic, than from the setup point of view I would say >F1RS is the better one (although both have weird characteristics).And if you >wish, you can get a 1999 race in F1RS as well."Neo" <[email hidden]> wrote
> What's better about F1RS than MGPRS2, besides an official license?
<sarcasm>
Sound in replay. Barcelona.
This threads makes those games look like excellent ones, but they are not,
if whoever newbie reads the thread.
--
-- Fran�ois M�nard <ymenard>
-- May the Downforce be with you...
"People think it must be fun to be a super genius, but they don't realise
how hard it is to put up with all the idiots in the world."
I noticed the same thing about Anti-Spin. Turn it off and it's a totally
different game.
Abandon Ubi Logic and deny to subscribe to the "all helps off is the most
realistic setting" and you'll have some fun with it.
I even made the "Expert" level at the RS2League with Anti-Spin on, and
everyone loves it a lot more. It's more intuitive as a whole (although still
not the best physics).
In all... I like RS2 for some fun in a modern F1 car until the new ones come
out from EA and Geoff.
If you decide to race online... check out : www.rs2league.com and have a few
rounds.
Cheers,
Shumi
David Karr <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:87qgjo$prb$[email hidden]...
> You know, when that notorious and famed sim (G_L) came out, I found MGPRS2
> to be rather dull (canned spins, etc.)
>
> BUT--not too terribly long ago, I went back and did a few things whichhave
> changed my opinion a bit. I raised the steering ratio to around 16-18
> degrees in all setups & I turned off the brake help.
>
> I've left the wheelspin help on (it's just too, too sensitive w/o it), and
> for now have left the anti-skid help on (because I'm too, too stupid)--and
> believe it or not, it's a different game from what I had remembered. Ihave
realistic.
> > What you have to realise is that all F1RS setups have to be dumped if
> > playing MGPRS2 because the cars react in a very different way.
> > Go for MGPRS2 with the last patch and all the addons from the'Unofficial'
But
> > it's
> > > a game, as is F1RS and it is in no way true Formula 1. But if you askme
> > > which one is more realistic, than from the setup point of view I would
> say
> > > F1RS is the better one (although both have weird characteristics).Andif
of
> a
> > > choise. F1RS is not available anymore in any shop for a long time
> (accept
> > in
> > > a dump-shop maybe). MGPRS2 is the cheap version now, since somewhereat
> > the
> > > end of this year there will be a follow-up by Ubisoft, as I've been
> told.
> > > Advice: copy it from friend ? Take F1RS. Have to buyt: not muchchoise,
Quoted text (15 lines)
> even caught and corrected a few of those canned spins! > > And there's an ultra-cool FF patch out that adds some serious tactile > feedback. > > --DK > > > "Iain Mackenzie" <[email hidden]> wrote in message > news:87pt1j$ik0$[email hidden]... > > I really don't understand this debate at all! > > MGPRS2 is better than F1RS in every respect - graphics (higher res), > > physics, AI and setups particularly. The way the setup options changed > the > > cars in F1RS was plain silly, but in MGPRS2 they are much moreQuoted text (14 lines)
> > site. > > Iain > > > > scrcs <[email hidden]> wrote in message > > news:87mf3o$btc$[email hidden]... > > > I don't agree with you Neo. Things did change. What changed is the way > you > > > have to set up a car before it runs a decent lap. After having learned > how > > > to do this in F1RS I turned to MGPRS2. First of all, all my setups in > F1RS > > > lacked a decent grip in the front. Also, with aids off I could hardly > keep > > > the cars on the track, even after finding decent setups in general.Quoted text (9 lines)
> > you > > > wish, you can get a 1999 race in F1RS as well. > > > The only thing I would call an negative aspect is the graphics thing. > > MGPRS2 > > > runs at 800*600, but F1RS only uses 640*400. The latter is a shame > because > > > my videocard has much improved drivers for 800*600, not for standard > > > VGA-resolution. > > > But in the end, if you have to buy the game, i think there's not muchQuoted text (14 lines)
> > > MGPRS2. > > > > > > scrcs > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Rubbish! MGPRS2 has some problems, but on the whole it is the best modern F1
sim out there, especially with all the addons from the 'Unofficial' site.
Iain
For the sake of this newsgroup, I'll just go and simply say that I disagree
completely.
--
-- Fran?ois Mnard <ymenard>
-- May the Downforce be with you...
"People think it must be fun to be a super genius, but they don't realise
how hard it is to put up with all the idiots in the world."
> > Rubbish! MGPRS2 has some problems, but on the whole it is the best modern
> F1
> > sim out there, especially with all the addons from the 'Unofficial' site.
> For the sake of this newsgroup, I'll just go and simply say that I disagree
> completely.
Very sane, ymenard.
And BTW, I'm sure "all the addons" hardly outweigh 2% of GP2's addons.
Also my opinion
Jens
On Thu, 10 Feb 2000 14:12:49 -0000, "Iain Mackenzie"
>> This threads makes those games look like excellent ones, but they are not,
>> if whoever newbie reads the thread.
>Rubbish! MGPRS2 has some problems, but on the whole it is the best modern F1
>sim out there, especially with all the addons from the 'Unofficial' site.
>Iain
---------------------------------------------
Remove "NOSPAM" before using my email-address
Visit my webpage at http://members.xoom.com/JensSchu/ for some serious stuff concerning:
Radio controlled airplanes
Racing simulation, esp. GPL
Classic cars, esp. Morris Minor
Agree 100%.
You just to give it a few hours.
>> Rubbish! MGPRS2 has some problems, but on the whole it is the best modern F1
>> sim out there, especially with all the addons from the 'Unofficial' site.
>Agree 100%.
>You just to give it a few hours.
Agree too. Too bad the unofficial locks out netscape users
(that's my browser of choice with Linux), so I haven't had a
chance to check for any updates.
Uwe
--
Uwe Schuerkamp //////////////////////////// http://www.schuerkamp.de/
Herford, Germany \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ (52.0N/8.5E)
Ever wondered what's wrong with the world? http://bnetwork.com/
PGP Fingerprint: 2E 13 20 22 9A 3F 63 7F 67 6F E9 B1 A8 36 A4 61
Since Rick hardly ever reads this newsgroup, I'll respond to that last post.
He is planning to make The Unofficial, netscape-friendly again. I'm not
sure what the exact timeline on this is going to be. But it is going to
happen.
I do agree with you Uwe. It is frustrating not being able to check out
what's going on with the site if you don't have IE.
F1Filter
> On Mon, 14 Feb 2000 14:42:51 +0100, Vedran Dordevic
> >> Rubbish! MGPRS2 has some problems, but on the whole it is the best modern F1
> >> sim out there, especially with all the addons from the 'Unofficial' site.
Quoted text (14 lines)
> >Agree 100%. > >You just to give it a few hours. > Agree too. Too bad the unofficial locks out netscape users > (that's my browser of choice with Linux), so I haven't had a > chance to check for any updates. > Uwe > -- > Uwe Schuerkamp //////////////////////////// http://www.schuerkamp.de/ > Herford, Germany \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ (52.0N/8.5E) > Ever wondered what's wrong with the world? http://bnetwork.com/ > PGP Fingerprint: 2E 13 20 22 9A 3F 63 7F 67 6F E9 B1 A8 36 A4 61On Wed, 23 Feb 2000 08:12:54 GMT, F1Filter <[email hidden]> wrote:
Thanks for your support. The web never would have grown to what
it is right now if people had designed it targeted at a single
platform / browser / specification. I can live with minor
annoyances like a page not displaying right or getting on my
tits my asking for stupid plugins, but locking out users at the
front door is biting yourself in the arse in the long run.
Uwe
--
Uwe Schuerkamp //////////////////////////// http://www.schuerkamp.de/
Herford, Germany \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ (52.0N/8.5E)
Ever wondered what's wrong with the world? http://bnetwork.com/
PGP Fingerprint: 2E 13 20 22 9A 3F 63 7F 67 6F E9 B1 A8 36 A4 61


































