ymenard wrote:
So you've done it then ? :-=
Beers and cheers
(uncle) Goy
"Team Mirage" http://members.prestige.net/bttw/teammirage/
"The Pits" http://www.theuspits.com/
* Spam is for losers who can't get business any other way *
"Spamkiller" http://www.spamkiller.com
Can GPL tracks be converted to the NASCAR 4 demo?
Posters discussed whether GPL tracks could be used in the NASCAR 4 demo. ymenard insisted the file architecture had barely changed, while track toolmakers Nigel Pattinson and Martin Granberg said the new .ptf format was a major change, and Goy Larsen pressed ymenard for evidence. Papyrus's Grant Reeve said conversion would not be simple but someone would probably figure it out, and George Smiley explained how the real Nordschleife had changed since 1967.
With Grant Reeve (Papyrus)
Automated summary.
>"Goy Larsen" <[email hidden]> wrote
> So you've done it then ? :-=
I think everybody went as far as they could considering the demo didn't have
the full file lists and information.
--
-- Fran�ois M�nard <ymenard>
-- May the Downforce be with you...
-- http://www.ymenard.com/
-- People think it must be fun to be a genius, but they don't realise how
hard it is to put up with all the idiots in the world.
> Uhhh, ignoring the fact that the .dat files are now compressed (yet youcan
> still drop any file into the folder instead of putting it inside the.dat),
> N4 shares the same engine as GPL and have very, very similar file
> architecture. It's just a matter of knowing how to, there won't be any
> difficulty transfering GPL tracks to N4 and vice-versa.
You must have a different N4 demo from what I have. What I've seen is the
biggest change they've made since ICR1. Maybe longer, but I don't go back
that far.
Cheers
Nigel
In article <_GZf6.34$[email hidden]>,
"George M. Smiley" <[email hidden]> writes:
> Now given that a
> stock GT3 lapped the 'Ring in 7:56.Xs in 1997 (yes, a
> modified course to be sure)
How is today's Nordschleife different from the one in GPL? I've seen
some in-car footage that people posted on the web, maybe I should go look
at it again. When I first watched it, I had only just started learning
the ring in GPL, and although I did recognize a few spots, a lot of it
was foreign to me when I saw it, both in the video and in GPL. :)
And while we're on the topic of track conversions, have the West brothers
made any comments about possible track compatibility/convertability
with GPL? Because I would dearly love to hustle the Audi R8 around
GPL's incarnations of the ring and Spa...
Marc
In article <AzVf6.382529$[email hidden]>, "Dave Henrie"
<[email hidden]> writes:
Imaging turn 1 on 'N4 ROC'...
Eldred
--
Tiger Stadium R.I.P. 1912-1999
Homepage - http://www.umich.edu/~epickett
GPL F1 hcp. +28.67...F2 +151.26...F3 hcp. +373.73
Never argue with an idiot. He brings you down to his level, then beats you
with experience...
Remove SPAM-OFF to reply.
Quoted text (7 lines)
> i haven't tried, but I don't "THINK" they would just drop in. I suspect >ol Dave Noonan is messing around with his track convertors to update them to >get N4 and GPL tracks swapped back and fourth... >dave henrie >(imagine the Ring in a 3500 pound car................ >..... >...........)"Nigel Pattinson" <[email hidden]> wrote
> You must have a different N4 demo from what I have. What I've seen is the
> biggest change they've made since ICR1. Maybe longer, but I don't go back
> that far.
I don't see any major changes in the file architecture, what are those you
are saying?
--
-- Fran�ois M�nard <ymenard>
-- May the Downforce be with you...
-- http://www.ymenard.com/
-- People think it must be fun to be a genius, but they don't realise how
hard it is to put up with all the idiots in the world.
"Marc Fraioli" <[email hidden]> wrote:
> How is today's Nordschleife different from the one in GPL.
In 1970 the track underwent a major rebuild. Corners were
straightened out, 'jumps' were removed, the hedges and a lot
of the surrounding vegetation was uprooted. In addition the
track was widened, a bit off run-off room was added here
and there and the armco barriers were installed.
It was also shortened by 10% in 1983 when they started working
on the new GP circuit.
All in all, what exists now is quite a bit faster than the version
in GPL which makes Clark's '67 time all the more remarkable.
- George
No Dover.trk file, No Dover.3DO, my guess is they have been combined into
Dover.ptf
"ymenard" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:mxig6.6483$[email hidden]...
> "Nigel Pattinson" <[email hidden]> wrote
> > You must have a different N4 demo from what I have. What I've seen isthe
> > biggest change they've made since ICR1. Maybe longer, but I don't goback
Quoted text (18 lines)
> > that far. > > I don't see any major changes in the file architecture, what are those you > are saying? > > > > > -- > -- Fran�ois M�nard <ymenard> > -- May the Downforce be with you... > -- http://www.ymenard.com/ > -- People think it must be fun to be a genius, but they don't realise how > hard it is to put up with all the idiots in the world. > > > >> > You must have a different N4 demo from what I have. What I've seen isthe
> > biggest change they've made since ICR1. Maybe longer, but I don't goback
> > that far.
>
> I don't see any major changes in the file architecture, what are those you
> are saying?
>So you have a broad understanding of the 3dos and the ptf, and don't see
anything much different ?
Cheers
Nigel
>"Nigel Pattinson" <[email hidden]> wrote
> So you have a broad understanding of the 3dos and the ptf, and don't see
> anything much different ?
Like I said, it's not a major change.
--
-- Fran�ois M�nard <ymenard>
-- May the Downforce be with you...
-- http://www.ymenard.com/
-- People think it must be fun to be a genius, but they don't realise how
hard it is to put up with all the idiots in the world.
On Thu, 08 Feb 2001 23:34:26 GMT, "ymenard" <[email hidden]>
wrote:
>>"Nigel Pattinson" <[email hidden]> wrote
>> So you have a broad understanding of the 3dos and the ptf, and don't see
>> anything much different ?
>
>Like I said, it's not a major change.
Then you definitely have a different demo than the rest of us.
Cheers,
/Martin
ymenard wrote:
>
> >"Nigel Pattinson" <[email hidden]> wrote
> > So you have a broad understanding of the 3dos and the ptf, and don't see
> > anything much different ?
>
> Like I said, it's not a major change.
C'mon Frank, give us examples.....
Beers and cheers
(uncle) Goy
"Team Mirage" http://members.prestige.net/bttw/teammirage/
"The Pits" http://www.theuspits.com/
* Spam is for losers who can't get business any other way *
"Spamkiller" http://www.spamkiller.com
[email hidden] (Goy Larsen) wrote:
> C'mon Frank, give us examples.....
I think I've mentioned this before, but when this was discussed on VROC a
while back Grant Reeve suggested conversion between N4 and GPL would *not*
be simple. He might be wrong <shrug>, only time will tell.
Andrew McP
Andrew MacPherson wrote:
It is times like these I wish I had the old statement from a Papy
employee claiming that converting ICR2 tracks to N2 and the other way
around would be *impossible*...:-)
Guess we'll see in due time
But of course, we could always ask Frank
Beers and cheers
(uncle) Goy
"Team Mirage" http://members.prestige.net/bttw/teammirage/
"The Pits" http://www.theuspits.com/
* Spam is for losers who can't get business any other way *
"Spamkiller" http://www.spamkiller.com
Quoted text (8 lines)
> > [email hidden] (Goy Larsen) wrote: > > > C'mon Frank, give us examples..... > > I think I've mentioned this before, but when this was discussed on VROC a > while back Grant Reeve suggested conversion between N4 and GPL would *not* > be simple. He might be wrong <shrug>, only time will tell.
Goy Larsen wrote:
Hey, I never said impossible! :) Given enough time, someone will
probably
figure it out.
Quoted text (17 lines)
> > Andrew MacPherson wrote: > > > > [email hidden] (Goy Larsen) wrote: > > > > > C'mon Frank, give us examples..... > > > > I think I've mentioned this before, but when this was discussed on VROC a > > while back Grant Reeve suggested conversion between N4 and GPL would *not* > > be simple. He might be wrong <shrug>, only time will tell. > > It is times like these I wish I had the old statement from a Papy > employee claiming that converting ICR2 tracks to N2 and the other way > around would be *impossible*...:-) > > Guess we'll see in due time >>"Goy Larsen" <[email hidden]> wrote
> But of course, we could always ask Frank
I'm just stating that the changes aren't major. We are still talking about
basically the same file architecture, the same 3d modeling and the same game
engine. Someday people will find a way to convert tracks.
--
-- Fran�ois M�nard <ymenard>
-- May the Downforce be with you...
-- http://www.ymenard.com/
-- People think it must be fun to be a genius, but they don't realise how
hard it is to put up with all the idiots in the world.
Grant Reeve wrote:
No, you guys have learned your lesson :-), but it was kinda funny at the
time, and it wasn't that long before David released his converters
either, it's one of those moments you tend to remember
> Given enough time, someone will probably figure it out.
Few things in life are truly impossible, "just" a matter of the right
person(s) having the persistence and knowledge, hope it happens sooner
than later, my copies of N4 is arriving early next week, so that would
be a good time, but since we have Glen and Sear already, I can wait a
couple of more weeks......:-)
If it's left to me it will never happen, wish I had that kind of
knowledge though
Now that you guys have completed N4, when will you start on "AussieV8
Racing 1" ?
Beers and cheers
(uncle) Goy
http://www.theuspits.com
http://www.teammirage.com
"A woman is an occasional pleasure but a cigar is always a smoke"
--Groucho Marx--
Quoted text (20 lines)
> > Goy Larsen wrote: > > > > Andrew MacPherson wrote: > > > > > > [email hidden] (Goy Larsen) wrote: > > > > > > > C'mon Frank, give us examples..... > > > > > > I think I've mentioned this before, but when this was discussed on VROC a > > > while back Grant Reeve suggested conversion between N4 and GPL would *not* > > > be simple. He might be wrong <shrug>, only time will tell. > > > > It is times like these I wish I had the old statement from a Papy > > employee claiming that converting ICR2 tracks to N2 and the other way > > around would be *impossible*...:-) > > > > Guess we'll see in due time > > > Hey, I never said impossible! :)ymenard wrote:
I have little doubt that some people might do that one day, but you were
arguing that you "don't see any major changes in the file architecture",
yet we had a couple of people who are known for their skills in this
area telling you otherwise, and your reply was "Like I said, it's not a
major change"
Time to back up some of your statements Frank, instead of just implying
that you know something that the rest of us don't, for the time being I
will consider Nigel's and Martin's work in the past to be all the backup
they'll need to do
Beers and cheers
(uncle) Goy
http://www.theuspits.com
http://www.teammirage.com
"A woman is an occasional pleasure but a cigar is always a smoke"
--Groucho Marx--
Quoted text (7 lines)
> > >"Goy Larsen" <[email hidden]> wrote > > But of course, we could always ask Frank > > I'm just stating that the changes aren't major. We are still talking about > basically the same file architecture, the same 3d modeling and the same game > engine. Someday people will find a way to convert tracks.>"Goy Larsen" <[email hidden]> wrote
> Time to back up some of your statements Frank, instead of just implying
> that you know something that the rest of us don't
Uh? Where did you assume that? Tell me please Uncle.
--
-- Fran�ois M�nard <ymenard>
-- May the Downforce be with you...
-- http://www.ymenard.com/
-- People think it must be fun to be a genius, but they don't realise how
hard it is to put up with all the idiots in the world.
ymenard wrote:
>
> >"Goy Larsen" <[email hidden]> wrote
> > Time to back up some of your statements Frank, instead of just implying
> > that you know something that the rest of us don't
>
> Uh? Where did you assume that? Tell me please Uncle.
In just about every post you write about these issues you do just that,
you always argue with people, but you never back it up with facts,
here's an example yet again
---
>Stephen Smith" <[email hidden]> wrote
> Don't hold yer breath.
Uhhh, ignoring the fact that the .dat files are now compressed (yet you
can
still drop any file into the folder instead of putting it inside the
.dat),
N4 shares the same engine as GPL and have very, very similar file
architecture. It's just a matter of knowing how to, there won't be any
difficulty transfering GPL tracks to N4 and vice-versa.
>"Goy Larsen" <[email hidden]> wrote
> So you've done it then ? :-=
I think everybody went as far as they could considering the demo didn't
have
the full file lists and information.
"Nigel Pattinson" <[email hidden]> wrote
> You must have a different N4 demo from what I have. What I've seen is the
> biggest change they've made since ICR1. Maybe longer, but I don't go back
> that far.
I don't see any major changes in the file architecture, what are those
you
are saying?
>"Nigel Pattinson" <[email hidden]> wrote
> So you have a broad understanding of the 3dos and the ptf, and don't see
> anything much different ?
Like I said, it's not a major change.
---
And this is from this thread alone, several people have asked you what
you know about this subject, and your only answer seems to be "I know"
Why can't you ever back up some of your statements with facts, several
of the people who have asked you these questions are known for their
skills for picking apart Papy's sims, so far I've yet to see much work
released that has been credited to you ?
Feel free to set the record straight here Frank, I've been told that
Crow tastes much like chicken and I'm quite prepared to eat it, or are
you a member of this "Secret GPL editing society" that you went on about
in this NG a couple of months ago, and are bound to secrecy perhaps ?
Beers and cheers
(uncle) Goy
http://www.theuspits.com
http://www.teammirage.com
"A woman is an occasional pleasure but a cigar is always a smoke"
--Groucho Marx--


































