rec.autos.simulators

by **Damien Smit** » Tue, 16 Oct 2001 08:30:39

Why are the 2001 times so much faster than the 2000 times?

2000 pole time: 1:30.556
2001 pole time: 1:26.892

None of the other tracks show such a difference, was it modified?

by **malicious top poste** » Tue, 16 Oct 2001 09:02:58

There were several races that the times really tumbled in and the reason is
tire development, better said as a "tire war". Look at the times for
Malaysia as well and a couple others.

by **Chris Kell** » Sat, 20 Oct 2001 18:49:18

there was an improovement in the Asphalt used on melbourne in 2001..

This same Asphlat was used at Bathurst too! and the times where so much
faster this year too!

if it not for the yellows would have been record race time!~!!!!!

> There were several races that the times really tumbled in and the reason
is
> tire development, better said as a "tire war". Look at the times for
> Malaysia as well and a couple others.

> > Why are the 2001 times so much faster than the 2000 times?

> > 2000 pole time: 1:30.556
> > 2001 pole time: 1:26.892

> > None of the other tracks show such a difference, was it modified?

rec.autos.simulators

F1 - Melbourne question

F1 - Melbourne question

F1 - Melbourne question

F1 - Melbourne question