> http://www.racesimcentral.net/
> ________________________________________________________
> **** REMOVE "NOSPAM" from my address to email me ****
Steve Phelan.
it!
Bizarre Creations (makers) have said all the time that it is an "arcade
racer" like POD.
They havent even put a***pit in the game so.......
Paul...
I fail to understand why the only two ratings for games here are
either "pile of shit" or "rules".
Randy
Randy
> Randy
Still, after playing F1GP2 for 3 months and then getting F1 on the
Playstation I thought it was absolutely f**king cr*p (hey, another new
rating!). I had a few mates try it out and they also had the same
opinion of F1. Still, if you like F1, well that's fine by me - it's your
money...
Steve Phelan.
Randy
On Wed, 23 Apr 1997 22:12:14 +0100, Steve Phelan
A.Renault
> >Still, after playing F1GP2 for 3 months and then getting F1 on the
> >Playstation I thought it was absolutely f**king cr*p (hey, another new
> >rating!). I had a few mates try it out and they also had the same
> >opinion of F1. Still, if you like F1, well that's fine by me - it's your
> >money...
> Well, the thing was still a huge seller for Psygnosis, so obviously a
> lot of people didn't share your opinion. What made F1 for the
> Playstation so great was really the tracks, in my opinion.
> Randy
I prefer F1 over F1GP2 because I can just 'jump in the car' and drive. In
arcade mode I can race round at ridiculous speeds and barge through large
groups of cars without spinning off and losing the whole race. Realistic -
no, fun - yes!
Also the track modelling is MUCH more realistic than F1GP2 - the tracks
look just like they do on TV. The impression of speed is much better too,
and the camera angles are fantastic.
It may not be as good a sim as F1GP2, but it captures the whole e***ment
and atmosphere of Formula 1 in a way that F1GP can't match.
I can't wait to get hold of my own copy.
Steve R.
