rec.autos.simulators

OT: DARPA's Women...and the Bots Who Love Them

Steve Smit

OT: DARPA's Women...and the Bots Who Love Them

by Steve Smit » Mon, 22 Mar 2004 04:03:36

Just wanted to get yer attention.  No kidding, I'm doing a story on the
recent DARPA-sponsored race for "autonomous" robot cars across the Mojave
(none finished) for a major national publication (no, not Playboy) and if
any of you saw the extensive coverage--or were there in person--and have any
pithy comments to make (with attribution or OTR), I'd love to hear 'em.
TIA.

--Steve

ZZ

OT: DARPA's Women...and the Bots Who Love Them

by ZZ » Mon, 22 Mar 2004 05:28:10

Is that the race that Wired Magazine had an article about in the March
issue?
How far did they go? About 100 yds?  ;-)
The driverless motorcycle looked like a silly idea, even if it's
technologically possible. I saw that one fall over after it's "helper" let
go of it.

--
Richard "ZZ" Busch

Member:
Screamers Racing League
OAO
MARA TransAm
GPL Rank + 17.410
MoGPL Rank + 318.294
N2003 Rank -12.4850
----------------
Remember racecar is racecar spelled backward
-----------------

Steve Smit

OT: DARPA's Women...and the Bots Who Love Them

by Steve Smit » Mon, 22 Mar 2004 05:51:24

Yes, it was covered in Wired and Pop Science, both long pre-race pieces in
the March issues.  During the event (which began at the Fontana Speedway),
the media was out in force: German TV, Japanese TV (altho no Japanese Bots,
despite their interest in robotics), local TV, the networks, cable news, the
wire services, the L.A. Times, the New York Times, the London Times, the
BBC, the History Channel, Wired, Pop Sci, Scientific American, etc.  And
yers truly.

The bike guy--it was a 125cc dirt bike--actually had the most resonant
theory (about why a 2-wheeler was the way to go), but the worst execution.
It never got very far during the event (neither did anybody else), it
actually only went abt. 3 ft., but he showed a video of it going around in
circles for several minutes.

The race was originally billed as Los Angeles to Las Vegas, abt. 350 miles.
Practical considerations reduced this to abt. 250 miles, and last-minute
concerns abt. whether or not there would be ANY finishers reduced this to
abt. 150 miles.  The farthest anybody actually got was abt. 7 miles, or 5%
of the distance.

Still, it's gonna happen.  Congress has mandated that one third of the
military's ground vehicles be autonomous (that is, self-driven--no human
input--as opposed to remote-controlled, like the Predator unmanned a/c) by
2015.  Billions in DoD contracts are at stake.  DARPA said if nobody claimed
the million-dollar, winner-take-all prize, the event would be re-run again
(and again) until somebody won.  I whispered to Dr. Anthony Tether, the
genial academic who heads DARPA (the Pentagon's think tank), "Why not roll
it over like a Lotto prize, and make it $2 million next time?"  "That's a
great idea," said Dr. Tony, who promptly announced it to the press.

If you can't wait until fall, 2005, when the next event will prolly be run,
there's already a kinda FIA for Bot racing, the International Robot Racing
Federation, which is going to start holding races later this year.


Woodie

OT: DARPA's Women...and the Bots Who Love Them

by Woodie » Mon, 22 Mar 2004 21:25:46



>I whispered to Dr. Anthony Tether, the
>genial academic who heads DARPA (the Pentagon's think tank), "Why not roll
>it over like a Lotto prize, and make it $2 million next time?"  "That's a
>great idea," said Dr. Tony, who promptly announced it to the press.

Does it bother anyone else that a lone individual can decide in an instant to
give away one million dollars of my money?

Don McCorkle


rec.autos.simulators is a usenet newsgroup formed in December, 1993. As this group was always unmoderated there may be some spam or off topic articles included. Some links do point back to racesimcentral.net as we could not validate the original address. Please report any pages that you believe warrant deletion from this archive (include the link in your email). RaceSimCentral.net is in no way responsible and does not endorse any of the content herein.