Go here and get the track conversion kits.
Follow his directions and start over.
http://homepages.infoseek.com/~nslr/index.htm
Crash
Cheers!
--
??Jan Kohl?? **The Pits Performance Team**
Computer Systems Programmer
USAF Air-Ground Operations School
Hurlburt Field, FL
Castle Graphics - http://www.castlegraphics.com/
The Pits - http://www.theuspits.com/
CHASSIS SELECTION
NASCAR Racing 1999 Edition allows you to choose from three different chassis
types for both the cars and Craftsman trucks:
Car Chassis 1: Balanced for slightly less rear downforce
Car Chassis 2: Neutral
Car Chassis 3: Balanced for slightly more rear downforce
Truck Chassis 1: Balanced for slightly less rear downforce
Truck Chassis 2: Neutral
Truck Chassis 3: Balanced for slightly more rear downforce
Please explain how *your* changing chassis 1, 2 & 3 to Ford, Chevy and
Pontiac agrees with what papy put in the readme. I think you guys are
all wrong on this one.
--
Header address intentionally scrambled to ward off the spamming hordes.
cisko [AT] ix [DOT] netcom [DOT] com
> >Tom, go get our PitsPatch 99. That will fix all your problems, and also
> >add the Ford/Chevy/Pontiac logos, plus the 1999 calendars.
> I guess I would like to know how you fellas know that chassis 1,2 and 3
> are Ford, Chevy and Pontiac. I did not read that into the documentation
> at all. Chassis 2 is supposed to be neutral while 1 & 3 should be low
> drag and high drag. Perhaps you missed this part of the readme:
> CHASSIS SELECTION
> NASCAR Racing 1999 Edition allows you to choose from three different chassis
> types for both the cars and Craftsman trucks:
> Car Chassis 1: Balanced for slightly less rear downforce
> Car Chassis 2: Neutral
> Car Chassis 3: Balanced for slightly more rear downforce
> Truck Chassis 1: Balanced for slightly less rear downforce
> Truck Chassis 2: Neutral
> Truck Chassis 3: Balanced for slightly more rear downforce
> Please explain how *your* changing chassis 1, 2 & 3 to Ford, Chevy and
> Pontiac agrees with what papy put in the readme. I think you guys are
> all wrong on this one.
> --
> Header address intentionally scrambled to ward off the spamming hordes.
> cisko [AT] ix [DOT] netcom [DOT] com
Now that was funny :)
Andrew B.
San Diego
>I guess I would like to know how you fellas know that chassis 1,2 and 3
>are Ford, Chevy and Pontiac. I did not read that into the documentation
>at all. Chassis 2 is supposed to be neutral while 1 & 3 should be low
>drag and high drag. Perhaps you missed this part of the readme:
>CHASSIS SELECTION
>NASCAR Racing 1999 Edition allows you to choose from three different chassis
>types for both the cars and Craftsman trucks:
>Car Chassis 1: Balanced for slightly less rear downforce
>Car Chassis 2: Neutral
>Car Chassis 3: Balanced for slightly more rear downforce
>Truck Chassis 1: Balanced for slightly less rear downforce
>Truck Chassis 2: Neutral
>Truck Chassis 3: Balanced for slightly more rear downforce
>Please explain how *your* changing chassis 1, 2 & 3 to Ford, Chevy and
>Pontiac agrees with what papy put in the readme. I think you guys are
>all wrong on this one.
>--
>Header address intentionally scrambled to ward off the spamming hordes.
>cisko [AT] ix [DOT] netcom [DOT] com
Well when you pit it like that who can argue :-)
--
Header address intentionally scrambled to ward off the spamming hordes.
cisko [AT] ix [DOT] netcom [DOT] com
> And that brings up another frigging thing!!! The chassis in a real Nascar
> car are all essentially the same (meaning welded tubular frames).
> There are certainly Ford, Chevy and Pontiac bodies, but no Ford, Chevy
> and Pontiac chassis. It makes sense to me that papy would try to give us
> a chassis for shorttracks and one for Superspeedways and one for
> Speedways, which is what I thought they did with the chassis 1,2 & 3.
> Which is why I think you good ole boys are wrong :-)
Ford BODIES have superior downforce, which is why they do well at medium sized
tracks. Chebbies have little downforce, which is why they are great at superspeedways.
Pontiacs are probably the best balanced, which is why they are arguably the best
overall body, and have won at both superspeedways and other tracks this year...
--
??Jan Kohl?? **The Pits Performance Team**
Computer Systems Programmer
USAF Air-Ground Operations School
Hurlburt Field, FL
Castle Graphics - http://www.castlegraphics.com/
The Pits - http://www.theuspits.com/
It was like that in N2 Greg...
During the development they decided to make those 3chassis a touch
different, and they were the same as what is wrote in the readme of NR99.
It's just for common sense that people updated the Chassis 1/2/3 to the car
chassis we knew from N2.
The chassis in N2/NR99 aren't completely different like what you find in
GPL, but they do have the minimal difference that makes alot of difference
when you become an experimented N2 driver. Especially on the NROS. I
couldn't see myself driving something else than a Pontiac on road courses on
the NROS.
In N3 you might have no chassis or completely accurate chassis like in the
98 WC season. It's a development choice that I would like to know... hehe
we need a press release ;)
- Fran?ois Mnard <ymenard> Good race at the Brickyard!
- Official Mentally retarded guy of r.a.s.
- Excuse me for my English (I'm French speaking)
- Sponsored by http://www.awpss.com/ on the NROS
- "People think it must be fun to be a super genius, but they don't realise
how hard it is to put up with all the idiots in the world."--
>It was like that in N2 Greg...
>During the development they decided to make those 3chassis a touch
>different, and they were the same as what is wrote in the readme of NR99.
>It's just for common sense that people updated the Chassis 1/2/3 to the car
>chassis we knew from N2.
>The chassis in N2/NR99 aren't completely different like what you find in
>GPL, but they do have the minimal difference that makes alot of difference
>when you become an experimented N2 driver. Especially on the NROS. I
>couldn't see myself driving something else than a Pontiac on road courses on
>the NROS.
>In N3 you might have no chassis or completely accurate chassis like in the
>98 WC season. It's a development choice that I would like to know... hehe
>we need a press release ;)
>- Francois Menard <ymenard> Good race at the Brickyard!
>- Official Mentally retarded guy of r.a.s.
>- Excuse me for my English (I'm French speaking)
>- Sponsored by http://www.awpss.com/ on the NROS
>- "People think it must be fun to be a super genius, but they don't realise
>how hard it is to put up with all the idiots in the world."--
