> If your serious about online racing try ten?!? NOooo, TEN is good for
> arcades (sometimes) RPG... etc... games that don't require exact
> 'location' of an opponent(S) right now. [snip]
> Right now... TEN and NROS is NOT the place for serious
> racing. It's ok for the arcade quality... but then some 'serious'
> NROS drivers are to serious for it to be just a game.
I disagree 100%! In fact, I have to wonder if you've ever even been on TEN
and raced at all! With a decent connection, you can race against 19 human
competitors and hardly notice you're online! Regarding the location
problem you mentioned, all you have to do is play the game to realize this
has been taken care of... I've never had a problem driving
bumper-to-bumper, even at 200mph+ down the stretches at Talledega. NOW,
I'm certain you've never been on TEN, but are just making a knee-jerk
reaction based on uninformed assumptions! Another point about the
"location" issue and Quake, for example, (or "arcades", as you call them)
vs. N2: one thing I've heard is that in Quake your movements are extremely
random and exist in three dimensions. In N2, your movement is much more
predictable and exists in only two dimensions. Even if you're completely
out of control, you'll still be limited by your momentum - you're never
going to jump up, do a 180, and keep full speed, for example. This allows
the prediction routines to be much more effective. I don't know if this is
true (it makes sense, though), but I do know that NROS is the most
technologically impressive game I've seen on the Net. It's not perfect,
but it's by far the best.
If you want the short argument, all you have to do is ask yourself where
the best drivers race! Then, try out the free TEN trial and you'll be
hooked.
Sean