rec.autos.simulators

satellite internet connections ?

MJS

satellite internet connections ?

by MJS » Sat, 15 Jul 2000 04:00:00

Anyone in the UK conected to the internet using a satellite connection ? If
yes what sort of speeds are you getting and is it worth upgrading to from
56. I was thinking of going the isdn route satellite looks interesting.
Sprry if this is a off topic.
Coli

satellite internet connections ?

by Coli » Sat, 15 Jul 2000 04:00:00

Forget satellite.  It has a high burst download speed but the latency is too
great.
Satellite is perfect for browsing the web and email but useless for online
***.  The latency is killer.
Cheers,
...Colin


d0le

satellite internet connections ?

by d0le » Sat, 15 Jul 2000 04:00:00

On Fri, 14 Jul 2000 21:08:09 +0100, "MJS"


>Anyone in the UK conected to the internet using a satellite connection ? If
>yes what sort of speeds are you getting and is it worth upgrading to from
>56. I was thinking of going the isdn route satellite looks interesting.
>Sprry if this is a off topic.

Satellite is good only for downstream only (all the upstream
communication is still handled via dialup 56k)

Latency is extremely high with Satellite (instead of just getting data
up and down the same pipe, data is upped via modem to satellite
provider, satellite provider gets the returned data, sends it up to
satellite, and then it's shot back down to you.. = very high ping in
internet games)

If you're looking for just the ability to download very fast get
satellite, (but be warned, every satellite i've seen charges you for
how much you download and the hours of use! ack! i hate when they do
that!) If you want to help your mulitplayer *** a bit, get ISDN.

Otherwise just keep the dialup.

Jo Helse

satellite internet connections ?

by Jo Helse » Sat, 15 Jul 2000 04:00:00


>Anyone in the UK conected to the internet using a satellite connection ? If
>yes what sort of speeds are you getting and is it worth upgrading to from
>56. I was thinking of going the isdn route satellite looks interesting.
>Sprry if this is a off topic.

I don't have any experience, but to me it sounds as if satellite could be a bad
option for an online racesim player because it could introduce more lag? Traffic
has to go high up to the satellite and back.

Just a suspicion, though.

JoH

------- The best way to accelerate a Mac is 9.81 m/s2 --------
--------------------------------------------------------------

Mark Lierman

satellite internet connections ?

by Mark Lierman » Sat, 15 Jul 2000 04:00:00

If you are switching to improve online ***, go the ISDN route.  If cable
or dsl is not available, and you want the best *** connection possible go
ISDN.  You'll be amazed how much a pure digital connection helps eliminate
packet loss while speeding up latency.


Kai Fulle

satellite internet connections ?

by Kai Fulle » Tue, 18 Jul 2000 04:00:00

that won't be true with Dish Network's 2-way internet satellite, which I
know little about.


> On Fri, 14 Jul 2000 21:08:09 +0100, "MJS"

> >Anyone in the UK conected to the internet using a satellite connection ?
If
> >yes what sort of speeds are you getting and is it worth upgrading to from
> >56. I was thinking of going the isdn route satellite looks interesting.
> >Sprry if this is a off topic.

> Satellite is good only for downstream only (all the upstream
> communication is still handled via dialup 56k)

> Latency is extremely high with Satellite (instead of just getting data
> up and down the same pipe, data is upped via modem to satellite
> provider, satellite provider gets the returned data, sends it up to
> satellite, and then it's shot back down to you.. = very high ping in
> internet games)

> If you're looking for just the ability to download very fast get
> satellite, (but be warned, every satellite i've seen charges you for
> how much you download and the hours of use! ack! i hate when they do
> that!) If you want to help your mulitplayer *** a bit, get ISDN.

> Otherwise just keep the dialup.

SKur

satellite internet connections ?

by SKur » Wed, 19 Jul 2000 04:00:00

Satellite IS high latency, = bad for *** whether its 2 way or not.

It may give u real fast downloads, but for *** it will suck.  Latency may
well be in the 1 second range, the signal has to travel so far, and laws of
physics can't change that.

Martyn_D


> that won't be true with Dish Network's 2-way internet satellite, which I
> know little about.



> > On Fri, 14 Jul 2000 21:08:09 +0100, "MJS"

> > >Anyone in the UK conected to the internet using a satellite connection ?
> If
> > >yes what sort of speeds are you getting and is it worth upgrading to from
> > >56. I was thinking of going the isdn route satellite looks interesting.
> > >Sprry if this is a off topic.

> > Satellite is good only for downstream only (all the upstream
> > communication is still handled via dialup 56k)

> > Latency is extremely high with Satellite (instead of just getting data
> > up and down the same pipe, data is upped via modem to satellite
> > provider, satellite provider gets the returned data, sends it up to
> > satellite, and then it's shot back down to you.. = very high ping in
> > internet games)

> > If you're looking for just the ability to download very fast get
> > satellite, (but be warned, every satellite i've seen charges you for
> > how much you download and the hours of use! ack! i hate when they do
> > that!) If you want to help your mulitplayer *** a bit, get ISDN.

> > Otherwise just keep the dialup.

Jo Hels

satellite internet connections ?

by Jo Hels » Thu, 20 Jul 2000 04:00:00


>Satellite IS high latency, = bad for *** whether its 2 way or not.

>It may give u real fast downloads, but for *** it will suck.  Latency may
>well be in the 1 second range, the signal has to travel so far, and laws of
>physics can't change that.

Hmmm... Maybe David Kaemmer should have a look at those physics  <G>

JoH

m.seer

satellite internet connections ?

by m.seer » Thu, 20 Jul 2000 04:00:00

did somebody say Physics <G>

MS


> >Satellite IS high latency, = bad for *** whether its 2 way or not.

> >It may give u real fast downloads, but for *** it will suck.  Latency
may
> >well be in the 1 second range, the signal has to travel so far, and laws
of
> >physics can't change that.

> Hmmm... Maybe David Kaemmer should have a look at those physics  <G>

> JoH


rec.autos.simulators is a usenet newsgroup formed in December, 1993. As this group was always unmoderated there may be some spam or off topic articles included. Some links do point back to racesimcentral.net as we could not validate the original address. Please report any pages that you believe warrant deletion from this archive (include the link in your email). RaceSimCentral.net is in no way responsible and does not endorse any of the content herein.