rec.autos.simulators

SAY NO TO DIVX!!!! off topic but important.

Jo

SAY NO TO DIVX!!!! off topic but important.

by Jo » Sun, 26 Apr 1998 04:00:00


>http://www.racesimcentral.net/
>This technology is Crap, please go and tell them how you feel.
>And spread the word!!

Here's a sample email I sent them that you might want to use
(suubstituting Disney or whomever for Fox where appropriate):

I'm writing to tell you I'm extremely disappointed that Fox is
supporting only the DIVX format for digital movies. I will never
purchase a DIVX player or any DIVX movies under any circumstances, as
I feel the whole system is a blatant rip off and money grab. As long
os Fox goes with DIVX, there will be no Fox movies purchased in my
home.

Joe

Ken Bear

SAY NO TO DIVX!!!! off topic but important.

by Ken Bear » Mon, 27 Apr 1998 04:00:00



>>http://techzone.weezy.com/dvd-faq.htm

>>This technology is Crap, please go and tell them how you feel.
>>And spread the word!!

>Here's a sample email I sent them that you might want to use
>(suubstituting Disney or whomever for Fox where appropriate):

>I'm writing to tell you I'm extremely disappointed that Fox is
>supporting only the DIVX format for digital movies. I will never
>purchase a DIVX player or any DIVX movies under any circumstances, as
>I feel the whole system is a blatant rip off and money grab. As long
>os Fox goes with DIVX, there will be no Fox movies purchased in my
>home.

>Joe

Same here - which sucks cuz I really want Star Wars Trilogy Special Edition,
Hunt for Red October, and Top Gun, (last two are Paramount, but so far
they're saying the same as Fox re:DVD/DIVX) in widescreen, Dolby Digital
sound and all the other goodness of DVD.

We'll get it - but we'll have to wait for DIVX to die apparently.  Or just a
while after the DIVX releases, supposedly the DIVX studios may release stuff
later for the "collector" market which sure as hell won't touch DIVX with a
10 foot pole.  These will be the widescreen versions with the extra stuff
(languages, trailers, interviews, etc.) - which won't be on the DIVX, those
will only be pan-n-scan no extras.

I'd love to meet the idiot who thought this one up - might have made some
small amount of sense if they subsidized the cost of the players through the
rentals and made 'em like $100-200 - but you have to buy the thing for MORE
than a standard DVD player - duh.  Not going to get it just to see
"Titanic", Star Wars SE, etc, when it's gonna cost me to watch the things
every time I play 'em, AND have to spend more up front, and I won't get the
widescreen version or the extras I've come to love on a DVD.

Perfect example, I love Apollo 13, have the DVD - it has a neat making-of
piece, and running commentaries from Jim/Marilyn Lovell and another from Ron
Howard, and is widescreen.  I'll pop it in every so often and watch just the
liftoff, or the splashdown, or some other scene, or watch the whole thing.
I'd have NONE of the extras, and pay an arm and a leg to watch this the way
I like with DIVX.

No thanks - what's next, pay-per-play software??  Dial in and pay every time
you fire up GPL? (to make this have some RAS relevance hehe)

Ken

Jo

SAY NO TO DIVX!!!! off topic but important.

by Jo » Mon, 27 Apr 1998 04:00:00


>Same here - which sucks cuz I really want Star Wars Trilogy Special Edition,
>Hunt for Red October, and Top Gun, (last two are Paramount, but so far
>they're saying the same as Fox re:DVD/DIVX) in widescreen, Dolby Digital
>sound and all the other goodness of DVD.
>We'll get it - but we'll have to wait for DIVX to die apparently.  

Precisely. The morons good have had DVD basuically replace the whole
video industry by the end of this year, but no one's going to buy DVD
now either becuase half the studios aren't supporting it. The
inevitable result? The whole digital movie industry will be held back
for at least another 2-3 years. Amazing how self-destructive lawyers
and accountants can be when given a free hand.

An MBA, most likely. The old "Hey, look how much profit there will be
if we don't bother with supplying quality" idiocy.

Believe it or not, there are people in this industry stupid enough to
think that's going to happen too.

Joe

Michael Haid

SAY NO TO DIVX!!!! off topic but important.

by Michael Haid » Tue, 28 Apr 1998 04:00:00


From http://techzone.weezy.com/dvd-faq.htm ...

"The system was invented by the Hollywood law firm of Ziffren, Brittenham,
Branca & Fischer. They think you should pay to watch movies EVERY TIME you view
them, even when you are at home. Thats right, lawyers invented this amazing
new bad technology. Imagine that."

Ever been to a video arcade? ;) I understand your point and agree with it
though. I would never ever buy a "pay per play" PC CD-ROM, nor will I buy DIVX.

Brian Shor

SAY NO TO DIVX!!!! off topic but important.

by Brian Shor » Wed, 29 Apr 1998 04:00:00



> >Same here - which sucks cuz I really want Star Wars Trilogy Special Edition,
> >Hunt for Red October, and Top Gun, (last two are Paramount, but so far
> >they're saying the same as Fox re:DVD/DIVX) in widescreen, Dolby Digital
> >sound and all the other goodness of DVD.

I read yesterday that Paramount is going to enter the DVD market... the link is
at www.bluesnews.com I think (a *** page but he is supporting the No DIVX Day
thing)

Brian Short

Jo

SAY NO TO DIVX!!!! off topic but important.

by Jo » Thu, 30 Apr 1998 04:00:00


>I read yesterday that Paramount is going to enter the DVD market...

Cool ... maybe DIVx will crumble faster than I expected. I hope so.

Joe

Mw421

SAY NO TO DIVX!!!! off topic but important.

by Mw421 » Fri, 01 May 1998 04:00:00

You've given some leech an idea.  It'll probably require a continuous ISDN
connection for single player, too.

MW


rec.autos.simulators is a usenet newsgroup formed in December, 1993. As this group was always unmoderated there may be some spam or off topic articles included. Some links do point back to racesimcentral.net as we could not validate the original address. Please report any pages that you believe warrant deletion from this archive (include the link in your email). RaceSimCentral.net is in no way responsible and does not endorse any of the content herein.