> > The whole thing was a mess, with him being quite treated badly on
the
> > site of his incident. Of course, the race was still on and there was a
> > danger of you know, bikes going at you at great speed, but the way he
was
> > transported did not help him at all. Who knows, he might have survived
if
> > he had been immobilised immediately.
> Hopefully the governing body will learn from it. Rider on the track? Red
> flag... 100%, right away. Kato had grave injuries, so it can be debated
> whether or not he would have survived (I do research in spine trauma, and
> Kato's injuries were about as bad as they can get), but flopping him on a
> stretcher like a rag doll did not help. It was disgraceful.
Well yeah that's about my view of the whole thing. Somebody crashed and you
even remotely a little fear for his safety or his life? Red flag. NOW.
Everybody goes into the pits or slows down to <30mph speeds around the
track.
You shouldn't even have to go fast while treating somebody with injury
because they are racing around you. Like you said, we don't know if he
would have survived if he had been treated correctly, but at least there
would have been a chance. Weird thing is that the guy who went to him first
had a very good knowledge of medical problems in those kind of situations.
--
-- Fran?ois Mnard <ymenard>
-- http://ymenard.cjb.net/
-- This announcement is brought to you by the Shimago-Dominguez
Corporation - helping America into the New World...