> Seeing many IRL crashes that have caused major injuries, I have to
> look
> and see what is wrong. Did they learn from CART's 2 fatal mistakes in
> CART-spec cars last year? Or were they out in "slower is safer"?
> Let's
> examine the facts.
> Major Injuries:
> 1996 MIS to Laguna Seca:
> MIS: E. Fittipaldi
> Indy: Scott Brayton (fatality), Allejandro (sp?) Zampedri, Fermin
> Velez(?)
> Toronto: Jeff Krosnoff (fatality)
> Las Vegas: Poster Boy (was it major or not? Not sure)
IRL rules, in High downforce, year old cars, they were not CART crashes,
with the lower downforce 1996 CART spec cars, the speeds would have been
lower, and the Drivers more experianced.
only one of those is CART......IRL is a bunch of idiots, in unsafe cars
powered by time bombs.
> So you see how many people have been injured since the new IRL chasis
> has
> been in effect. I may have forgotten some, but I obviously have a
> feeling
> they didn't look at the fatal crashes of Krosnoff and Brayton and
> learned.
> The biggest problem is the carbon fiber not absorbing the impact.
> That
> is why some CART cars in similar or worse crashes have not been as bad
> as
> the crashes above (except maybe C. Fittipaldi).
> What is your opinion on this? I'd wished Leah, Allan, Ehud, and
> everyone
> on RASI could come here and respond....
> Christopher Sampang
> MIRacing engineer
> http://www.racesimcentral.net/