rec.autos.simulators

by **Scott B. Huste** » Wed, 05 Nov 1997 04:00:00

<HTML>
I see many of you make comments about what someone deems necessary and
minimum fps.  I for one expect that when I purchase a game for $50.00
(about average price these days for a good game) I expect to be able to
use ALL of the "eye candy" and other options if my machine meets the "recommended"
requirements.

<P>Just my .02

<P>Scott B. Husted
<BR><A HREF="http://www.racesimcentral.net/~sbhusted">http://www.racesimcentral.net/~sbhusted</A>
<BR> </HTML>

by **Trevor C Thoma** » Thu, 06 Nov 1997 04:00:00

> I see many of you make comments about what someone deems necessary and
> minimum fps. I for one expect that when I purchase a game for $50.00
> (about average price these days for a good game) I expect to be able
> to use ALL of the "eye candy" and other options if my machine meets
> the "recommended" requirements.

> Just my .02

> Scott B. Husted
> http://home.ptd.net/~sbhusted

I find myself in agreement with you, personally I think the only thing
listed under machine requirements should be what it takes to do this, I
dont like the "minimum requirements" BS because everyone knows what kind
of performance you get with that!

Trev

rec.autos.simulators

"Eye Candy"

"Eye Candy"

"Eye Candy"