upgrading my internet connection but ISDN is too costly(they charge by the
packet here and I race too much online).
Vintook
Vintook
Randy
John
>Vintook
|Don't go satellite! The latency is much greater than ISDN, ADSL, Cable
modem
|or T1. I even think it has a higher latency than modems!
|
|John
|
|>Is anyone using a satellite dish setup to run on VROC??? I'm looking into
|>upgrading my internet connection but ISDN is too costly(they charge by the
|>packet here and I race too much online).
|>
|>Vintook
|>
|>
|>
|
|
Jason.
> Vintook
-Larry
> |Don't go satellite! The latency is much greater than ISDN, ADSL, Cable
> modem
> |or T1. I even think it has a higher latency than modems!
> |
> |John
> |
> |>Is anyone using a satellite dish setup to run on VROC??? I'm looking into
> |>upgrading my internet connection but ISDN is too costly(they charge by the
> |>packet here and I race too much online).
> |>
> |>Vintook
> |>
> |>
> |>
> |
> |
The problem is latency. Latency on DirecPC is horrible...
The reason for this is that the downlink is non-terrestrial (it comes
from the satellite) and special headers have to be attached to the IP
requests to re-direct the downdata thru the sat system to your your
computer.
Latencies on DirecPC are measured in seconds, not the milliseconds that
are required.
DirecPC is ok for downloading files and web browsing. It's un-usable
for latency strict functions.
-Larry
> Vintook
-Larry
> John
> >Is anyone using a satellite dish setup to run on VROC??? I'm looking into
> >upgrading my internet connection but ISDN is too costly(they charge by the
> >packet here and I race too much online).
> >Vintook
--
Kirk Lane
ICQ: 28171652
>-Larry
>> Don't go satellite! The latency is much greater than ISDN, ADSL, Cable
modem
>> or T1. I even think it has a higher latency than modems!
>> John
>> >Is anyone using a satellite dish setup to run on VROC??? I'm looking
into
>> >upgrading my internet connection but ISDN is too costly(they charge by
the
>> >packet here and I race too much online).
>> >Vintook
On the downlink, especially from FTP sites, it _usually_ performs well.
In fact, I sometimes get much more than the stated 400k speed. About 2
weeks ago, I had 9 download pipes running and was pulling 1.5mb/sec
downstream!
I'm not defending Hughes at all. DirecPC has a ton of technical
problems that can drive you nuts. And, the company can be one of the
most arrogant organizations I've ever dealt with.
The ARE history as soon as cable hits.
-Larry