It's no GPL.
Jan./ what the... ?
=---
It's no GPL.
Jan./ what the... ?
=---
The sad part is he's about 50 years too late to find many outhouses in
Indiana to throw himself at.
Budd Cochran
> > a very skillful attack
> > who profits?
> > -Israeli incursions in two P.A. towns
> > -the largest British fleet organized in eigh*** years
> > "coincidentally" has been on route for days nearing the
> > Middle East for "maneuvers"
> > -America asking for coalition of global powers for
> > new "counter-insurgent" war... a planetary Vietnam.
> > Rather then seriously ask why people would kill
> > themselves and so many others, "we" put an answer in
> > their mouths and say, -Prez-"they attack us because we
> > are the bastion of freedom in the world." period....
> > Some introspection? No. Respect for the enemy? No.
> > Understanding the enemy? No. That is why the forces of
> > reaction do not know what the terms are or what to do.
> > These are the fruits of the politics of denial. We deny
> > the complaints of our victims, even deny they are our
> > victims, and blind ourselves to a planet of enmity.
> > Understanding this, as I have long fruitlessly preached
> > as a "lunatic", one must take one of three possible
> > courses: X) Understand ones position of domination, take
> > every defensive measure, and terrorize the dominated. Y)
> > Deny ones imperial position and be over run by a million
> > cuts Z) Discard past paradigms worn thin since times
> > before pharaoh, make a detente for all humankind and all
> > the rest of nature, including a transformation in our
> > relationships to the Earth and human to human.
> > The standing "American authorities" want solution Y with
> > a big war on the dispossessed, Islam, and the rest. It
> > would be the fourth world war since the sheep in America
> > seem to have missed the third one. Our "leaders"
> > are inept, impotent, and culpable in one of two ways.
> > First: For a second "hijacked" commercial jet to strike
> > the most critical concentration in the global capitalist
> > economy, twenty minutes after the first, and with no
> > military response, is profound negligence. Particularly
> > in the wake of the 1993 WTC attack, the success of this
> > attack is pure negligence...or... complicity. If it is
> > simple puerile negligence, then the governor of NY, and
> > the mayor of NYC, who are so busy congratulating and
> > patting each other on the back for what a great job they
> > have done, should resign in shame and utter ***
> > for their total failure. Also former governor Cuomo
> > should beg the forgiveness of his constituents and the
> > greater public. The joint chiefs of staff, as well as
> > all regional military and air commanders should resign
> > or be court-martialed for negligence. The current
> > administration as well as members of senate and house
> > intelligence and military committees should be removed
> > from office and placed under house arrest for extensive
> > questioning. The former administration should be
> > likewise detained. All planning staffs for civil
> > defense and air security should be detained and
> > questioned, if not court marshaled. That is if an enemy
> > attacked us. If there was, however, foreknowledge by any
> > elements of our government, there should be a grand
> > jury, and also a global response. There have been many
> > comparisons today and since the annihilation of the WTC
> > with Pearl Harbor, the attack on Hawaii in 1941. Years
> > of speculation over the absence of our vital air-craft
> > carriers at that attack, as well as myriad evidence,
> > points to a foreknowledge by F.D.R. which is confirmed
> > by a decade of public study of the code breaking facts
> > of Ultra Mega. Many times after Pearl Harbor the
> > British and Americans allowed their own troop ships to
> > go to the bottom rather than reveal to the enemy that
> > all their codes were useless. This was rationalized
> > then and now as expedient both to motivate the American
> > public to eagerness for war and to help finally win it.
> > Today what would be the motive? In a world that should
> > head for peace we have a threatened way of life, the
> > global capitalist military industrial "complex". In
> > need of perceived enemies and great battles, and willing
> > to accept at least a police state "counter-insurgency"
> > planetary domination system, would they sacrifice the
> > WTC? Symbolically it will inspire hundreds of thousands
> > of those disenfranchised with western freedom to fight
> > and seek training and organizations that can help them
> > achieve something so grand. There is our enemy, since
> > realistically China has not invaded its neighbors
> > significantly for a thousand year and is not likely to
> > threaten the U.S.(only Tibet, and maybe one of
> > Siberia.... wait and see-either way the U.S. never even
> > did anything about Tibet) So now around the world we
> > will have tight security which will not stop anything
> > and the police state planet NWO will attempt to take
> > control and will, basically if they are not stopped
> > here. Guilty or innocent the current authorities have
> > to go, for America and the Earth
> > Feel free to distribute my views...
> > What was it an attack against?
> > a view from NYC: 14sep2001
> > --
> > It sowed, you judged, yet Ziad never amazingly changed at the room.
lot's of crossposting, to useless groups. You figure out which one isn't
part of the current one now.