Carl,
Thanks. That is pretty much what I have experienced when I race at a track
in which I am much slower than the AI (like 100% strength) at Daytona (not
that great at qualifying at these large tracks).
If I lower the AI setting to 95% at Texas and quality first. I can still
beat the AI, but they will keep up with me better with ASC turned on than
with it off. With ASC off and 95% AI at Texas, I can lap quite a few cars
in about 34 laps (10%), but not with ASC turned on. Thus, the AI cars
appear to become faster because I am faster than them.
I haven't tried ASC yet in which I qualify in the middle of the pack, but
then again, why use it if I am competitive?
Thanks again for the response.
Alan Hood
> A, but at a new roadcourse which you still learn: B
> My experience is that all the drivers stops up, until your at position 2.
> When at position 2, the 2 first drivers speeds up somewhat. When passing
> the
> #2 driver, the #1 driver gets all winded up and starts driving like never
> before.
> You can try to pass him, but he'll push so hard that he'll soon reclaim
> pos
> #1.
> If you crash, they all pace down so that you can get back to #3 then the 2
> first guys starts racing again.
> That's how I experience the AI guys in ASC mode. :)
>> I was wondering how other drivers of NASCAR Racing 2003 thought of the
>> Adaptive Speed Control (ASC) feature. Is this feature considered to be...
>> (A) A gimmick, don't bother with it.
>> (B) Useful and fun because it keeps the driver in the thick of the
>> racing action.
>> (C) Should not be used because the racing experience is unrealistic and
>> more arcade-like than simulation.
>> Thanks in advance for any and all input.
>> Alan Hood