stupid.
Is there a reason that Con, Mass has no restrictor plates but the other tracks,
Daytona, Talledega and I think Darlington do? I have no problem with it, I like
traveling along at 235-240 mph... very exhilirating (sp).
Rich
Is there a reason that Con, Mass has no restrictor plates but the other tracks,
Daytona, Talledega and I think Darlington do? I have no problem with it, I like
traveling along at 235-240 mph... very exhilirating (sp).
Rich
For no other reason than it's a fantasy track, an opportunity to run on a
Super Speedway-style track without restrictor plates. I like it, not the
most demanding course but it's a good exercise in responsible driving and
race strategy. Until you see the AI attempting to go 4-wide out of T4 and
you know the start/finish straight is going to be littered with wrecks. at
least you can use the run-off on the back straight.
__
Si.
Rich
>> I am a newbe with the Nascar thing, so bear with me if the question sounds
>> stupid.
>> Is there a reason that Con, Mass has no restrictor plates but the other
>tracks,
>> Daytona, Talledega and I think Darlington do? I have no problem with it, I
>like
>> traveling along at 235-240 mph... very exhilirating (sp).
>For no other reason than it's a fantasy track, an opportunity to run on a
>Super Speedway-style track without restrictor plates. I like it, not the
>most demanding course but it's a good exercise in responsible driving and
>race strategy. Until you see the AI attempting to go 4-wide out of T4 and
>you know the start/finish straight is going to be littered with wrecks. at
>least you can use the run-off on the back straight.
>__
>Si.
> Rich
> >Subject: Re: nr2003 Coca Cola... Concorde , Mass
> >Date: 2/9/03 8:14 PM Eastern Standard Time
> >> I am a newbe with the Nascar thing, so bear with me if the question sounds
> >> stupid.
> >> Is there a reason that Con, Mass has no restrictor plates but the other
> >tracks,
> >> Daytona, Talledega and I think Darlington do? I have no problem with it, I
> >like
> >> traveling along at 235-240 mph... very exhilirating (sp).
> >For no other reason than it's a fantasy track, an opportunity to run on a
> >Super Speedway-style track without restrictor plates. I like it, not the
> >most demanding course but it's a good exercise in responsible driving and
> >race strategy. Until you see the AI attempting to go 4-wide out of T4 and
> >you know the start/finish straight is going to be littered with wrecks. at
> >least you can use the run-off on the back straight.
> >__
> >Si.
Mike
http://mikebeauchamp.com
> > ok, thanks for the replys... I guess I can cancel my plans for heading
for that
> > track event... ;-)
> > Rich
> > >Subject: Re: nr2003 Coca Cola... Concorde , Mass
> > >Date: 2/9/03 8:14 PM Eastern Standard Time
> > >> I am a newbe with the Nascar thing, so bear with me if the question
sounds
> > >> stupid.
> > >> Is there a reason that Con, Mass has no restrictor plates but the
other
> > >tracks,
> > >> Daytona, Talledega and I think Darlington do? I have no problem with
it, I
> > >like
> > >> traveling along at 235-240 mph... very exhilirating (sp).
> > >For no other reason than it's a fantasy track, an opportunity to run on
a
> > >Super Speedway-style track without restrictor plates. I like it, not
the
> > >most demanding course but it's a good exercise in responsible driving
and
> > >race strategy. Until you see the AI attempting to go 4-wide out of T4
and
> > >you know the start/finish straight is going to be littered with wrecks.
at
> > >least you can use the run-off on the back straight.
> > >__
> > >Si.
--
-- Fran?ois Mnard <ymenard>
-- http://ymenard.cjb.net/
-- This announcement is brought to you by the Shimago-Dominguez
Corporation - helping America into the New World...
Larry