rec.autos.simulators

where are the WMD?

fredrickso

where are the WMD?

by fredrickso » Mon, 28 Nov 2005 06:17:06

anyone?

how many more americans are you willing to kill over there ?

B Wegne

where are the WMD?

by B Wegne » Mon, 28 Nov 2005 06:22:40

troll alert

  anyone?

  how many more americans are you willing to kill over there ?

Raybee197

where are the WMD?

by Raybee197 » Mon, 28 Nov 2005 06:43:35


> troll alert



>     anyone?

>     how many more americans are you willing to kill over there ?

LOL...They were moved to Syria and Iran.When we invade those two
countries,we'll find they were moved back to Iraq..LOL
Ed Medli

where are the WMD?

by Ed Medli » Tue, 29 Nov 2005 00:25:42


What we HAVE found.......Not a lot, but against the UN mandates,...........

1.77 metric tons of enriched uranium

1,500 gallons of chemical weapons agents

17 chemical warheads containing cyclosarin (a nerve agent five times more
deadly than sarin gas)

Over 1,000 radioactive materials in powdered form meant for dispersal over
populated areas

Roadside bombs loaded with mustard and "conventional" sarin gas, assembled
in binary chemical projectiles for maximum potency

Mitch_

where are the WMD?

by Mitch_ » Tue, 29 Nov 2005 03:08:03

Naw Ed, can't be...

If it were true then CNN or CBS would have told me so...

Repeat after me, Bush lied and were in a war that cannot be won....
Cindy Sheehan is the real story not the War.......

Mitch




>> anyone?

>> how many more americans are you willing to kill over there ?

> What we HAVE found.......Not a lot, but against the UN
> mandates,...........

> 1.77 metric tons of enriched uranium

> 1,500 gallons of chemical weapons agents

> 17 chemical warheads containing cyclosarin (a nerve agent five times more
> deadly than sarin gas)

> Over 1,000 radioactive materials in powdered form meant for dispersal over
> populated areas

> Roadside bombs loaded with mustard and "conventional" sarin gas, assembled
> in binary chemical projectiles for maximum potency

Byron Forbe

where are the WMD?

by Byron Forbe » Tue, 29 Nov 2005 10:25:57




>> anyone?

>> how many more americans are you willing to kill over there ?

> What we HAVE found.......Not a lot, but against the UN
> mandates,...........

> 1.77 metric tons of enriched uranium

> 1,500 gallons of chemical weapons agents

> 17 chemical warheads containing cyclosarin (a nerve agent five times more
> deadly than sarin gas)

> Over 1,000 radioactive materials in powdered form meant for dispersal over
> populated areas

> Roadside bombs loaded with mustard and "conventional" sarin gas, assembled
> in binary chemical projectiles for maximum potency

    What the UN have not done - stop the production of probably about 1000
times the amount of such stuff elsewhere in the world.

    What the U.N. have fundamentally done is dethrown a maniac - had they
have stated that as their primary or even only objective then all this
bullshit would have been avoided. That's what they get for being full of
shit!

Steve Whitt

where are the WMD?

by Steve Whitt » Tue, 29 Nov 2005 14:50:18






>>> anyone?

>>> how many more americans are you willing to kill over there ?

>> What we HAVE found.......Not a lot, but against the UN
>> mandates,...........

>> 1.77 metric tons of enriched uranium

>> 1,500 gallons of chemical weapons agents

>> 17 chemical warheads containing cyclosarin (a nerve agent five times more
>> deadly than sarin gas)

>> Over 1,000 radioactive materials in powdered form meant for dispersal
>> over populated areas

>> Roadside bombs loaded with mustard and "conventional" sarin gas,
>> assembled in binary chemical projectiles for maximum potency

>    What the UN have not done - stop the production of probably about 1000
> times the amount of such stuff elsewhere in the world.

>    What the U.N. have fundamentally done is dethrown a maniac - had they
> have stated that as their primary or even only objective then all this
> bullshit would have been avoided. That's what they get for being full of
> shit!

uh, the UN had nothing to do with it.  The US on the other hand, went it
alone with the help of a couple of countries.

steve

Uwe Sch??rkam

where are the WMD?

by Uwe Sch??rkam » Tue, 29 Nov 2005 18:13:15


> Roadside bombs loaded with mustard and "conventional" sarin gas

eeeeww, why the mustard???? If it wasn't for the sarin gas in there, I'd
understand the comical aspect, but what do they dip their sausages into
down there? Babarians.

Cheers, uwe

--
GPG Fingerprint:  2E 13 20 22 9A 3F 63 7F  67 6F E9 B1 A8 36 A4 61

Jeff Vincen

where are the WMD?

by Jeff Vincen » Wed, 30 Nov 2005 01:35:38









>>>> anyone?

>>>> how many more americans are you willing to kill over there ?

>>> What we HAVE found.......Not a lot, but against the UN
>>> mandates,...........

>>> 1.77 metric tons of enriched uranium

>>> 1,500 gallons of chemical weapons agents

>>> 17 chemical warheads containing cyclosarin (a nerve agent five times more
>>> deadly than sarin gas)

>>> Over 1,000 radioactive materials in powdered form meant for dispersal
>>> over populated areas

>>> Roadside bombs loaded with mustard and "conventional" sarin gas,
>>> assembled in binary chemical projectiles for maximum potency

>>    What the UN have not done - stop the production of probably about 1000
>> times the amount of such stuff elsewhere in the world.

>>    What the U.N. have fundamentally done is dethrown a maniac - had they
>> have stated that as their primary or even only objective then all this
>> bullshit would have been avoided. That's what they get for being full of
>> shit!

>uh, the UN had nothing to do with it.  The US on the other hand, went it
>alone with the help of a couple of countries.

UN, US, Simbin, ISI...  They're all the same thing aren't they?  :)

You're off your trolley!  :)

----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----

Byron Forbe

where are the WMD?

by Byron Forbe » Thu, 01 Dec 2005 05:44:40










>>>>> anyone?

>>>>> how many more americans are you willing to kill over there ?

>>>> What we HAVE found.......Not a lot, but against the UN
>>>> mandates,...........

>>>> 1.77 metric tons of enriched uranium

>>>> 1,500 gallons of chemical weapons agents

>>>> 17 chemical warheads containing cyclosarin (a nerve agent five times
>>>> more
>>>> deadly than sarin gas)

>>>> Over 1,000 radioactive materials in powdered form meant for dispersal
>>>> over populated areas

>>>> Roadside bombs loaded with mustard and "conventional" sarin gas,
>>>> assembled in binary chemical projectiles for maximum potency

>>>    What the UN have not done - stop the production of probably about
>>> 1000
>>> times the amount of such stuff elsewhere in the world.

>>>    What the U.N. have fundamentally done is dethrown a maniac - had they
>>> have stated that as their primary or even only objective then all this
>>> bullshit would have been avoided. That's what they get for being full of
>>> shit!

>>uh, the UN had nothing to do with it.  The US on the other hand, went it
>>alone with the help of a couple of countries.

> UN, US, Simbin, ISI...  They're all the same thing aren't they?  :)

> You're off your trolley!  :)

    LOL.
JTB

where are the WMD?

by JTB » Thu, 01 Dec 2005 10:58:19








>>>> anyone?

>>>> how many more americans are you willing to kill over there ?

>>> What we HAVE found.......Not a lot, but against the UN
>>> mandates,...........

>>> 1.77 metric tons of enriched uranium

>>> 1,500 gallons of chemical weapons agents

>>> 17 chemical warheads containing cyclosarin (a nerve agent five times
>>> more deadly than sarin gas)

>>> Over 1,000 radioactive materials in powdered form meant for dispersal
>>> over populated areas

>>> Roadside bombs loaded with mustard and "conventional" sarin gas,
>>> assembled in binary chemical projectiles for maximum potency

>>    What the UN have not done - stop the production of probably about 1000
>> times the amount of such stuff elsewhere in the world.

>>    What the U.N. have fundamentally done is dethrown a maniac - had they
>> have stated that as their primary or even only objective then all this
>> bullshit would have been avoided. That's what they get for being full of
>> shit!
> uh, the UN had nothing to do with it.  The US on the other hand, went it
> alone with the help of a couple of countries.

Alone.....with others??
Steve Whitt

where are the WMD?

by Steve Whitt » Thu, 01 Dec 2005 15:40:39










>>>>> anyone?

>>>>> how many more americans are you willing to kill over there ?

>>>> What we HAVE found.......Not a lot, but against the UN
>>>> mandates,...........

>>>> 1.77 metric tons of enriched uranium

>>>> 1,500 gallons of chemical weapons agents

>>>> 17 chemical warheads containing cyclosarin (a nerve agent five times
>>>> more deadly than sarin gas)

>>>> Over 1,000 radioactive materials in powdered form meant for dispersal
>>>> over populated areas

>>>> Roadside bombs loaded with mustard and "conventional" sarin gas,
>>>> assembled in binary chemical projectiles for maximum potency

>>>    What the UN have not done - stop the production of probably about
>>> 1000 times the amount of such stuff elsewhere in the world.

>>>    What the U.N. have fundamentally done is dethrown a maniac - had they
>>> have stated that as their primary or even only objective then all this
>>> bullshit would have been avoided. That's what they get for being full of
>>> shit!
>> uh, the UN had nothing to do with it.  The US on the other hand, went it
>> alone with the help of a couple of countries.

> Alone.....with others??

You know what I meant. :)  realised after I hit the send button, but
unfortunately can't edit these posts....

cheers

steve

Byron Forbe

where are the WMD?

by Byron Forbe » Sat, 03 Dec 2005 18:06:51












>>>>>> anyone?

>>>>>> how many more americans are you willing to kill over there ?

>>>>> What we HAVE found.......Not a lot, but against the UN
>>>>> mandates,...........

>>>>> 1.77 metric tons of enriched uranium

>>>>> 1,500 gallons of chemical weapons agents

>>>>> 17 chemical warheads containing cyclosarin (a nerve agent five times
>>>>> more deadly than sarin gas)

>>>>> Over 1,000 radioactive materials in powdered form meant for dispersal
>>>>> over populated areas

>>>>> Roadside bombs loaded with mustard and "conventional" sarin gas,
>>>>> assembled in binary chemical projectiles for maximum potency

>>>>    What the UN have not done - stop the production of probably about
>>>> 1000 times the amount of such stuff elsewhere in the world.

>>>>    What the U.N. have fundamentally done is dethrown a maniac - had
>>>> they have stated that as their primary or even only objective then all
>>>> this bullshit would have been avoided. That's what they get for being
>>>> full of shit!
>>> uh, the UN had nothing to do with it.  The US on the other hand, went it
>>> alone with the help of a couple of countries.

>> Alone.....with others??

> You know what I meant. :)  realised after I hit the send button, but
> unfortunately can't edit these posts....

> cheers

> steve

    Sometimes I forget that the U.N. doesn't realise all they're sipposed to
be is something for NATO to hide behind so that the world thinks it's run
by.................the world. ***y U.N. - give 'em an
inch....................... As is plain to see though, if NATO (or more
precisely - the U.S.) can't hide behind the U.N., it's a luxury they're
happy to forego. :)

rec.autos.simulators is a usenet newsgroup formed in December, 1993. As this group was always unmoderated there may be some spam or off topic articles included. Some links do point back to racesimcentral.net as we could not validate the original address. Please report any pages that you believe warrant deletion from this archive (include the link in your email). RaceSimCentral.net is in no way responsible and does not endorse any of the content herein.