rec.autos.simulators

GPLSF - lotus 3do fix

R A Wrigh

GPLSF - lotus 3do fix

by R A Wrigh » Tue, 13 Jun 2000 04:00:00

Bruce theirs some cracking photographs there thank for posting the url

Regards

Bob


> In fact, here's the URL of the***pit shot:
> http://www.racesimcentral.net/

> --
> Regards,
> Bruce Kennewell,
> Canberra, Australia.
> ---------------------------



> > Do the most accurate on available data, Ken.
> > realism is always the best to aim for.
> > If you want an accurate shot have a look at the article in a recent
> > MotorSport magazine (the one with the Eagle and the Lotus 49).
> > There's also some shots on Eddy Isanki's site...
> > http://www.racesimcentral.net/

> > --
> > Regards,
> > Bruce Kennewell,
> > Canberra, Australia.
> > ---------------------------



> > > Marc Collins pointed out the for the Lotus3 dash layout, the modified
> 3do
> > > had a distortion in certain parts of the chassis when viewed from the
> F10
> > > perspective......the issue has been fixed and the zip files for that
> dash
> > > now contain a repaired 3do.
> > > Many thanks MC.
> > > We are learning as we go along here so your patience is appreciated
> folks.
> > > KD
> > >  Not sure if this is the appropriate way to go about this
but..........I
> > > would like to get a sense of what GPLers think is the most popular
dash
> > > layout for the 67 Eagle....period photos show several different
layouts
> > and
> > > I'm not sure which to pursue. Lotus downloads are showing that people
> have
> > a
> > > preference for dash1 although dash3 (the other dash on the site) is
the
> > most
> > > accurate based on several photos. Just trying to get heads upon this
> prior
> > > to putting many hours of work in.
> > > Thanks.

Marc Collin

GPLSF - lotus 3do fix

by Marc Collin » Tue, 13 Jun 2000 04:00:00

I prefer and use the "3" version.

My vote for the Eagle would be any version that looks great and resembles at
least one of the real photos.  Ditto for the rest of the marques!

Marc.



rec.autos.simulators is a usenet newsgroup formed in December, 1993. As this group was always unmoderated there may be some spam or off topic articles included. Some links do point back to racesimcentral.net as we could not validate the original address. Please report any pages that you believe warrant deletion from this archive (include the link in your email). RaceSimCentral.net is in no way responsible and does not endorse any of the content herein.