Fps is 40-90, but especially in corners i can see its not smooth.
Like its choppy. Hmm best way i can say...
GF4200 with 4351, have tried other drivers, but its the same.
Anyone tried this?
Martin
Martin
GTR is a demanding mod. What are some of the rest of your specs? i.e.
cpu, ram etc. And do you have goodies on like FSAA? With that video card
you should be getting close to the 40million triangle area in
3dconfig.exe(inside f1 2k2 folder) what are the results 3d config reports?
dave henrie
I have a AMD xp2400 running 11,5*182, 2*256 mb Samsung DDR.
System have been tortured in both Memtest and Prime95, and it run
flawlessly. I think to remember the same problem when i ran the game,
F1-2002, last year, but was then able to get rid of it somehow. Its like a
halt for 1/10 of a second with 10 seconds interval, and it is ofcause most
noticeable when cornering because of the panning effect. I think ;-)
3d config report 41,7 million triangels.
Martin.
> > GTR is a demanding mod. What are some of the rest of your specs?
i.e.
> > cpu, ram etc. And do you have goodies on like FSAA? With that video
card
> > you should be getting close to the 40million triangle area in
> > 3dconfig.exe(inside f1 2k2 folder) what are the results 3d config
> reports?
> I have a AMD xp2400 running 11,5*182, 2*256 mb Samsung DDR.
> System have been tortured in both Memtest and Prime95, and it run
> flawlessly. I think to remember the same problem when i ran the game,
> F1-2002, last year, but was then able to get rid of it somehow. Its like a
> halt for 1/10 of a second with 10 seconds interval, and it is ofcause most
> noticeable when cornering because of the panning effect. I think ;-)
> 3d config report 41,7 million triangels.
> Martin.
Jim
dave henrie
Regards,
Joao Gonzalez
Martin.
Martin.
> > Martin
Gf2 is too old a card. You can improve fps in GTR by turning off the
mirrors and hud. use the mirrors after the pack thins out after the first
lap.
dave henrie
> > I would be very happy if i can get it up to 30 Fps,now its only
> > arround 18Fps.I changed de quality settings without results.I have AMD
> > 1800,256 ram,GF 2 GTS with direct X9.I tried 3d benchmark,my result
> > was 200, i hoped for arround 4 to 5000.What is wrong with this
> > machine?Any help would be appreciated,grtz
> Gf2 is too old a card. You can improve fps in GTR by turning off the
> mirrors and hud. use the mirrors after the pack thins out after the first
> lap.
> dave henrie
One bit of info. If you ran the latest 3d benchmark, you had to have
dx9 installed, which you do. But your card is closer to dx7. So even
running the previous version of 3dmark you would get a fairly low score.
Using 3dmark 2000 is more suited to your current card, but since you have
dx9 installed it probably won't work. So seeing such a low score with
3dmark is not as bad as it seems, it is just that your present card cannot
run most of the items that 3dmark tests. I would guess you probably would
be in the 3 to 4 thousand area if you could get 3dmark2001se to run. But
that would also mean dropping back to dx8. So don't get too worked up by
these benchmarks, they are aimed at the latest and greatest cards out
there. having said that, your card is outdated and somewhat underpowered
but you don't have to upgrade yet. Soon most all the games will be dx9
versons and you will lose more and more features. So make sure if you do
upgrade you don't grab a dx8 level card like the GF4's and ATI 9000. Try
to get one that already supports dx9. Good luck.
dave henrie