I''m going to second this one. I ran 2000/98SE dual for about 3 years
and then swtiched to XP/98SE. If you have the hard drive space, then
go for it as there isn't really a reason not to.
I do FAT32 on all my partitions except for my XP partition which I use
NTFS for security, etc. That way, I can access my game directories
from either OS. And if you find that you are barely using one of your
OS', just go into your boot.ini file and change the delay time to like
5 seconds and you will barely notice that you have 2 OS as your boot
times will be pretty much the same as if you had 1 OS.
I play a lot of different games and there are still a handful of games
that run faster on 98SE. In addition, I have had major problems using
a combination of WinXP, KT133 chipset and a USB camera. This is a
well documented problem, so I just gave up and whenever I use my web
cam, I use 98SE.
My two cents.
Raymond
ACT LABS
www.act-labs.com
On Mon, 15 Apr 2002 16:39:27 +1000, "James Pickard"
>Best solution I"ve found is dual boot Win98 / XP. I ran a triple boot while
>experimenting with XP (98 / 2000 / XP) and found I didn't need 2000 at all,
>so I formatted the available partition.
>Although XP runs almost everything, some seem to miss out (Medal of Honor
>is the only thing I've found), plus XP has the 'Run as...' mode where you
>can select which OS you want to run the program as. Someitmes works if you
>run a program on XP, as Win98.
>James
>> It's been a while since I've used 98 so I was wondering, would it be
>> worthwhile to install 98 on another partition and use it to run games?
>> The advantage I'm assuming may be better frame rates?
>> thx
>> "I want to share something with you: The three
>> little sentences that will get you through life.
>> Number 1: Cover for me.
>> Number 2: Oh, good idea, Boss!
>> Number 3: It was like that when I got here."
>> -Homer Simpson