Right you are! I have been saying along that a patch to manually
adjust the AI wou help the sim tremendously.
When you hae Jim Clark's computer character qualifying seven
seconds faster at Kyalami than they actually did in 1967 you cannot
tell me the is "true to form"
I thenk the "intelligent AI" is b**sh*t -------- and any reasonable
person affiiated with Papyrus or a sim player knows it.
I think it is time to cut the ***---------------- hite c\back some
of the workers they let go when this sem was released, and correct the
GLARING problems that exist.
It wouldn't take much ----------- just a true effort on their part
in the sake of public relations ------------------
LETS SEE WHAT THE DO ------------------------ I WILL BET THEY DO
NOTHING. WHY SHOULD THEY ----------- THEY HAVE OUR MONEY --------
THEY CAN ESSENTIALLY TELL US TO TAKE A HIKE --------------- which is
what I will do with future sims they release.
If they don't care any more than that -------------- then they
haven't earned my business ------ and never will again.
I understand that the issue came up about manual adjust of the AI in
the development stage ----------- but obviously the EGO maniacs won
out saying "these are the best in the world"
-----------------------B S ------------------------------
this is not real life and definitely not 1967 ------------- I am glad
those ego maniacs don;t work for me ----------- they would last five
minuets with my company -------------------- LACK OF COMMON SENSE
would do them in!
DOUG