>The addresses are near same, both are from ix.netcom.com
>Further proof M Darrel Young spilled out by himself. He said the reason that
>the sentences are so close together is because my newsreader. Take note that the
>"ATTN: Ed" post has the sentences put together. And his "THAT WAS NOT.." post
>had the same thing! Also, the "FINAL.." post has the same. Do you consider it
>concidental that the so-called "MDYoung imposter" has the same NEWSREADER as the real
>as the real MDYoung.
>I rest my case, feel free to comment on the proof I have here.
1. he did post it and is a liar
2. someone got hold of his account and / or computer & posted in his
name.
If it is the former, he deserves all the contempt he can get (for the
lying bit that is - I would have no trouble if whoever posted it said
"sorry, in a bad mood, please forget it...."). If it is the latter
option, he needs to do some investigative work to find out who the
jerk really is. Otherwise he could be in for a really hard time...
(It is also an outside possibility that someone managed to forge the
header information. It is not impossible, but would take a _lot_ of
effort to do it as comprehensively)
He says he didn't post it. I have no reason to believe that he is
lying when he says this. If you really have proof that he sat at his
keyboard & typed it in, then post it. If not, then give the guy at
least half a chance.
Richard