Here we go again. Another company pats themselves on the
back for crafting a true 'simulation' when in truth they have
fallen short of the mark again. Is marketing more important
than content?
Another group of *** related 'e-zines' pushes out a preview
that is little more than a repackaged press release. What
happened to looking out for the interests of your readers?
Don't get me wrong, I have nothing against motorsport games
that seek to ease up the difficulty of what they are attempting
to model in an attempt to capture a larger market share. I
do however have a real problem when they put the all
encompassing stamp of 'realistic physics model' on their
product when it really is nothing more than an advanced arcade
game.
Today's example: GP500 'previewed' at Games.Net
(http://www.racesimcentral.net/,1034,7487,00.html)
Read the review, catch the buzzwords (I particularly like 'applied
mathematics to effectively recreate the science of matter in motion').
Now go on to the screenshots page and marvel at the second shot
of a rider at full lean on 500cc GP bike on the grass!
- George