Given your intended package, I suggest you take a close look at two very thorough
articles at Tom's Hardware Guide ( http://www.tomshardware.com/ ). One reviews TNT2
cards, the other Voodoo 3 cards, but they run several comparisons against regular TNT,
Voodoo 2 SLI, and even an ATI Rage thrown in for laughs. Both Intel and AMD systems
are used for the benchmarks, and you may find the differences quite interesting. One
thing to remember is that if you decide against Voodoo 2 you rule out any 3dfx only
games, which may or may not be a factor to you. From personal experience, I run GPL
on one machine with a Banshee, on the other with a Voodoo2 and a Mystique G200 for a
base card, and am hard pressed to notice any difference. Regardless of which card you
choose, one thing I have found which makes a huge difference, and in my opinion is
often overlooked in the scramble to find the best video card, is the quality of your
monitor. Spend as big as you can there, fine dot pitch is a must, you won't regret
it. LOL.
Zog
> Okay, so heres my intended upgrade package, (especially for GPL and GP2!)
> so far:
> AMD K6-2 450
> 128Mb RAM PC-100
> Aopen AX59Pro
> Fast 8.5 - 9 gig Hard Drive
> 17" .26 dot monitor
> Soundblaster Live!
> Microsoft FF wheel
> Which leaves, of course, the graphics card(s). So guys, which way do I go;
> Riva TNT, Voodoo Banshee or Voodoo 2? If I go for a 3D accelerator card,
> what 2D choice do I make? If I decide on Voodoo 2, Ill buy one now and
> maybe a second card at a later stage.
> Any advice would be much appreciated.
> Craig
> **** Posted from RemarQ - http://www.remarq.com - Discussions Start Here (tm) ****
--
Don't let the bastards grind you down.
Doug Schneider
Bedford, Nova Scotia
Canada