rec.autos.simulators

Stock Car Evolution is fantastic

samso

Stock Car Evolution is fantastic

by samso » Mon, 18 Sep 2006 00:44:17

I just did a 30 lap online race last night at Jacksonville (Daytona
clone). Except for the really long yellow flags, the racing was
brilliant. It was just as good as NR2003.
spa..

Stock Car Evolution is fantastic

by spa.. » Mon, 18 Sep 2006 08:02:14

 I just did a 30 lap online race last night at Jacksonville (Daytona
 clone). Except for the really long yellow flags, the racing was
 brilliant. It was just as good as NR2003.

  I completely disagree with you
........................................................................................................................................................I
think it's better than N2003 . Physics are much more real , the latest
version SCE.97 is really great. Check it out here.
http://www.rfstockcars.com/  Steve P

Alan Bernard

Stock Car Evolution is fantastic

by Alan Bernard » Mon, 18 Sep 2006 10:01:29


Once again, the tendency of SCE to commercialism and hence, in the future,
to become retail, somewhat throws me off.  Going commercial is fine; but
pretending not to have any such notions and then actually doing it, is
another story.

Every time something new happens with SCE, there's always someone
(oftentimes more than one person) who drops in and plugs the game-- someone
who might be intimately involved.  This always leads me to believe that
there's this commercial push going on, of which the public will learn about
soon enough.

Alanb

samso

Stock Car Evolution is fantastic

by samso » Tue, 19 Sep 2006 01:29:53




>> I just did a 30 lap online race last night at Jacksonville (Daytona
>> clone). Except for the really long yellow flags, the racing was
>> brilliant. It was just as good as NR2003.

>>  I completely disagree with you
>> ........................................................................................................................................................I
>> think it's better than N2003 . Physics are much more real , the latest
>> version SCE.97 is really great. Check it out here.
>> http://www.rfstockcars.com/  Steve P

> Once again, the tendency of SCE to commercialism and hence, in the future,
> to become retail, somewhat throws me off.  Going commercial is fine; but
> pretending not to have any such notions and then actually doing it, is
> another story.

> Every time something new happens with SCE, there's always someone
> (oftentimes more than one person) who drops in and plugs the game-- someone
> who might be intimately involved.  This always leads me to believe that
> there's this commercial push going on, of which the public will learn about
> soon enough.

> Alanb

You need help. I just want more opponents.
Mitch_

Stock Car Evolution is fantastic

by Mitch_ » Tue, 19 Sep 2006 01:48:14

I thought you left for good Larry/Fredrickson?  It sooo eeeeasy to spot your
one sentence first grade bullshit..

Yet another alias eh? What a sad fn loser you are, just kill yourself
already Larry Bakesmith you little ***ing piece of shit troll!

Mitch

"samson/Fredrickson/ReggieWhite/etc/etc/etc spwewed in msg"

!news-east.rr.com!news-wrt-01.southeast.rr.com!news-wrt-01.tampabay.rr.com!news-feed-01.tampabay.rr.com!news.rr.com!news-post.tampabay.rr.com!tornado.tampabay.rr.com.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail

jason moye

Stock Car Evolution is fantastic

by jason moye » Tue, 19 Sep 2006 04:02:58


> Once again, the tendency of SCE to commercialism and hence, in the future,
> to become retail, somewhat throws me off.

I couldn't care less about whether it goes commercial or not or any of
that pretentious bullshit that people seem to enjoy arguing about
nowadays.  What I care about is that it's complete garbage, and pretty
much represents everything I hate about simulation mods.  I guess it
looks pretty.
Alan Bernard

Stock Car Evolution is fantastic

by Alan Bernard » Tue, 19 Sep 2006 10:23:47



>> Once again, the tendency of SCE to commercialism and hence, in the
>> future,
>> to become retail, somewhat throws me off.

> I couldn't care less about whether it goes commercial or not or any of
> that pretentious bullshit that people seem to enjoy arguing about
> nowadays.  What I care about is that it's complete garbage, and pretty
> much represents everything I hate about simulation mods.  I guess it
> looks pretty.

Well, this is part of the problem, I think.  Commercialism adds to the hype,
which is never what a thing really is when looked at more closely.  There's
money being pumped into the mod from different sources, which allows some at
SCE to advertise the game to be what it isn't.  Others follow suit, not
because there's anything spectacularly realistic about SCE but because they
see dollars in the future.  More dollars equals more misrepresentation and
untruths to the public, part of which might believe in the hype.

I'm beginning to lose some faith in rFactor.  There are so many mods and so
many revisions of mods that it's hard to get a handle on things.  I think
I'll stay with GTR2 for a bit.  I sometimes enjoy a stable, niched product,
rather than one that is spread out and diluted.  For F1 cars, rFactor is
king; but for the GTs, I'll move to GTR2.

Alanb

cosmo_kram..

Stock Car Evolution is fantastic

by cosmo_kram.. » Tue, 19 Sep 2006 22:56:11





> >> Once again, the tendency of SCE to commercialism and hence, in the
> >> future,
> >> to become retail, somewhat throws me off.

> > I couldn't care less about whether it goes commercial or not or any of
> > that pretentious bullshit that people seem to enjoy arguing about
> > nowadays.  What I care about is that it's complete garbage, and pretty
> > much represents everything I hate about simulation mods.  I guess it
> > looks pretty.

> Well, this is part of the problem, I think.  Commercialism adds to the hype,
> which is never what a thing really is when looked at more closely.  There's
> money being pumped into the mod from different sources, which allows some at
> SCE to advertise the game to be what it isn't.  Others follow suit, not
> because there's anything spectacularly realistic about SCE but because they
> see dollars in the future.  More dollars equals more misrepresentation and
> untruths to the public, part of which might believe in the hype.

> I'm beginning to lose some faith in rFactor.  There are so many mods and so
> many revisions of mods that it's hard to get a handle on things.  I think
> I'll stay with GTR2 for a bit.  I sometimes enjoy a stable, niched product,
> rather than one that is spread out and diluted.  For F1 cars, rFactor is
> king; but for the GTs, I'll move to GTR2.

> Alanb

I haven't researched the evolution or funding of SCE enough to know or
care if it is/will ever be a commercial product.  All I know is that I
donwloaded the .97 version for free, and it is the best stock car mod
currently available for rFactor (and perhaps available on PC's in
general).  My only gripe at the moment is that I don't have a Nextel
Cup skin pack for the mod - but I'm sure that will change soon enough.

I have lost no faith with rFactor.  There are so many mods and so many
revisions of mods - I could never get bored!   It's like getting a
whole new sim every couple of weeks!  Admittedly, some of the mods and
tracks are not up to high enough standards, but those quickly get
deleted - so no harm.  I love the fact that I can drive such a wide
variety of vehicles - from Karts to Touring to Nascar to F3's to F1's
(in several eras!) to ...   And I can race those cars on a seemingly
endless variety of tracks.  Yeah, I guess that's just not good enough
for some pepole...  But I'll take it!

I have nothing against GTR2, as I believe it is an excellent product.
I just can't seem to justify the purchase when I already have trouble
finding enough time to get the most out of rFactor and GTL.  Besides, I
almost feel like I have GTR2 already - being able to drive 6 cars on
many (GTL) tracks with the GTR2 demo.  GTR2 is indeed great for GT
racing.  But rFactor is (almost) equally great at so much more!...

-CK

Ronald Stoeh

Stock Car Evolution is fantastic

by Ronald Stoeh » Wed, 20 Sep 2006 01:49:05

snipped
 >

Well, next you're gonna complain about too many channels on TV, right?

l8er
ronny

Alan Bernard

Stock Car Evolution is fantastic

by Alan Bernard » Wed, 20 Sep 2006 02:12:35





> snipped

>> I'm beginning to lose some faith in rFactor.  There are so many mods and
>> so many revisions of mods that it's hard to get a handle on things.  I
>> think I'll stay with GTR2 for a bit.  I sometimes enjoy a stable, niched
>> product, rather than one that is spread out and diluted.  For F1 cars,
>> rFactor is king; but for the GTs, I'll move to GTR2.

> Well, next you're gonna complain about too many channels on TV, right?

> l8er
> ronny

Sorry, I don't watch television, except when sports is on.  The last time I
watched the national news was maybe 25 years ago.

Anyhow, I don't see your point.  rFactor sometimes gets out of hand, with a
track released one minute and some adverti***t add-on within seconds of
the track's release.  This creates numerous mismatches, and causes
frustration connecting with an otherwise excellent netcode.

Alanb

Bernard Spilma

Stock Car Evolution is fantastic

by Bernard Spilma » Wed, 20 Sep 2006 09:04:59


I see you're still at you rhetorical stride.
Nice to know we can always count on seeing the same
old mongrel pitbull snarling away at somebody.
WS

Larr

Stock Car Evolution is fantastic

by Larr » Thu, 21 Sep 2006 02:02:06

Can you two just put it back in your pants please?

Jeez.  I expect one of you to say "Yeah, and it deep too!" before long.

-Larry




>>I thought you left for good Larry/Fredrickson?  It sooo eeeeasy to spot
>>your one sentence first grade bullshit..

>> Yet another alias eh? What a sad fn loser you are, just kill yourself
>> already Larry Bakesmith you little ***ing piece of shit troll!

>> Mitch

> I see you're still at you rhetorical stride.
> Nice to know we can always count on seeing the same
> old mongrel pitbull snarling away at somebody.
> WS


rec.autos.simulators is a usenet newsgroup formed in December, 1993. As this group was always unmoderated there may be some spam or off topic articles included. Some links do point back to racesimcentral.net as we could not validate the original address. Please report any pages that you believe warrant deletion from this archive (include the link in your email). RaceSimCentral.net is in no way responsible and does not endorse any of the content herein.