>Huh?
I attached a few examples of your non-uptight posts.
============ here they are ===========
>Subject: arcadish game
>I cant beleive I waited this long for a crappy arcade game.I mean who
>ever heard of hitting the wall at 160 MPH and only breaking half my wing
>off. PLEASE!!!GIVE ME A BREAK!and thats in ace to.Looks like as long as
>it took to release the stupid thing they would have come up with a
>little more realistic car damage.Not that I like to see things break and
>fly apart but if they are going to call it a real sim they better fix
>it. If not its just another arcade game.I think Microprose should look
>to Papyrus in the future to see how a real sim is supose to be like.
>===========================================
>Subject: Who the hell did they make GP2 for?
>NASA? I have a p166,16megs EDOram,ATI Mach 64 video card with 2 megs and
>still cant run in full detail Any way ICR2 IS MUCH MORE REALISTIC i MEAN
>WHO EVER HEARD OF HITTING A WALL AT 160+ AND ONLY DAMAGING YOUR WING
>COME ON!
>==============================================
>Subject: Re:are we taking it to serious?
>Its not just a game when you have to pay outrages long distance phone
>bills.
>===============================================
>Subject: Microprose Flunkys!
0000.0111.0000.0101 + mwowmwowm + 0001.1001.1001.1000
right.reverend.ed (r.revv.ed) <> http://www.racesimcentral.net/~flashboy