Ovals for GPL?

Are there any good ovals for GPL that have good AI and are not converted tracks?

"asdgsa" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]... > Are there any good ovals for GPL that have good AI and are not > converted tracks? http://magnust.d2g.com/ Malc.

"Malc" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:LVQg9.7935$J47.590272@stones...

Quoted text (9 lines)

> "asdgsa" <[email hidden]> wrote in message > news:[email hidden]... > > Are there any good ovals for GPL that have good AI and are not > > converted tracks? > > http://magnust.d2g.com/ > > Malc. >

Sorry Malc.. :) he specifically asked for "GOOD" ovals...are there any?? lol!! dave henrie

On Sun, 15 Sep 2002 01:12:45 GMT, "Dave Henrie" <[email hidden]> wrote: > Sorry Malc.. :) he specifically asked for "GOOD" ovals...are there any?? >lol!! To be completely serious, there was one with decent hi-res textures but for the life of me I can't remember the name. I believe it was flat and ran clockwise? Jason ----- GPLRank 24.50 N2002Rank -12.995

"Dave Henrie" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:h8Rg9.482364$UU1.77836@sccrnsc03...

Quoted text (13 lines)

> > "Malc" <[email hidden]> wrote in message > news:LVQg9.7935$J47.590272@stones... > > "asdgsa" <[email hidden]> wrote in message > > news:[email hidden]... > > > Are there any good ovals for GPL that have good AI and are not > > > converted tracks? > > > > http://magnust.d2g.com/ > > > > Malc. > > > Sorry Malc.. :) he specifically asked for "GOOD" ovals...are there

any?? > lol!! By my definition there are no "GOOD" ovals ;-) Surely the CART brigade must have some suggestions? Malc.

Dave Henrie wrote:

Quoted text (15 lines)

> "Malc" <[email hidden]> wrote in message > news:LVQg9.7935$J47.590272@stones... > > "asdgsa" <[email hidden]> wrote in message > > news:[email hidden]... > > > Are there any good ovals for GPL that have good AI and are not > > > converted tracks? > > > > http://magnust.d2g.com/ > > > > Malc. > > > Sorry Malc.. :) he specifically asked for "GOOD" ovals...are there any?? > lol!! > > dave henrie

Waterloo is really good: a 2+ mile trioval with the tri part on the backstretch. John DiFool

On Sun, 15 Sep 2002 15:59:12 GMT, John DiFool <[email hidden]> wrote:

Quoted text (19 lines)

>Dave Henrie wrote: > >> "Malc" <[email hidden]> wrote in message >> news:LVQg9.7935$J47.590272@stones... >> > "asdgsa" <[email hidden]> wrote in message >> > news:[email hidden]... >> > > Are there any good ovals for GPL that have good AI and are not >> > > converted tracks? >> > >> > http://magnust.d2g.com/ >> > >> > Malc. >> > >> Sorry Malc.. :) he specifically asked for "GOOD" ovals...are there any?? >> lol!! >> >> dave henrie > >Waterloo is really good: a 2+ mile trioval with the tri part on the backstretch.

Except the AI stinks. I saw 7 or 8 barrel rolls during a race there. And the Lotus boys kept crashing every 5 laps... so it was easy to lead.

On Sun, 15 Sep 2002 15:59:12 GMT, John DiFool <[email hidden]> wrote:

Quoted text (19 lines)

>Dave Henrie wrote: > >> "Malc" <[email hidden]> wrote in message >> news:LVQg9.7935$J47.590272@stones... >> > "asdgsa" <[email hidden]> wrote in message >> > news:[email hidden]... >> > > Are there any good ovals for GPL that have good AI and are not >> > > converted tracks? >> > >> > http://magnust.d2g.com/ >> > >> > Malc. >> > >> Sorry Malc.. :) he specifically asked for "GOOD" ovals...are there any?? >> lol!! >> >> dave henrie > >Waterloo is really good: a 2+ mile trioval with the tri part on the backstretch.

BTW I am very impressed with Laustizring <sp> in Germany. Well worth the download.

I'm curious to see responses to this thread also. With ICRII/CPR the ovals were a good place to practice dealing with traffic: it was always there. Is GPL not suited to ovals? The lack of aero and its adjustments makes ovals very different from other sims; and as you hint, I don't think anyone has ever tweeked the AI for ovals. Jim asdgsa wrote: >Are there any good ovals for GPL that have good AI and are not >converted tracks? >

It's for the converted ovals but there are tweaked AI files from Sabre Team at: http://teamfriendship.m4driving.sm/sabre.htm SB "The Carvalho Family" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...

Quoted text (14 lines)

> I'm curious to see responses to this thread also. With ICRII/CPR the > ovals were a good place to practice dealing with traffic: it was always > there. Is GPL not suited to ovals? The lack of aero and its adjustments > makes ovals very different from other sims; and as you hint, I don't > think anyone has ever tweeked the AI for ovals. > > Jim > > asdgsa wrote: > > >Are there any good ovals for GPL that have good AI and are not > >converted tracks? > > >

Caveat - just dl'ed 'em and tried a couple of tracks. The AI still seem to crash all over the place for no apparent reason. The front few AI drivers at Michigan were doing pretty well, running quickly, drafting each other and passing back and forth - until they hit some slow lappers; then they completely lost it. Oh well.... SB "Steve Blankenship" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:SyKh9.99760$[email hidden]... > It's for the converted ovals but there are tweaked AI files from SabreTeam

Quoted text (24 lines)

> at: > > http://teamfriendship.m4driving.sm/sabre.htm > > SB > > "The Carvalho Family" <[email hidden]> wrote in message > news:[email hidden]... > > I'm curious to see responses to this thread also. With ICRII/CPR the > > ovals were a good place to practice dealing with traffic: it was always > > there. Is GPL not suited to ovals? The lack of aero and its adjustments > > makes ovals very different from other sims; and as you hint, I don't > > think anyone has ever tweeked the AI for ovals. > > > > Jim > > > > asdgsa wrote: > > > > >Are there any good ovals for GPL that have good AI and are not > > >converted tracks? > > > > > > >

http://www.simcyberworld.com/users/gpl/gpl.shtml "The Carvalho Family" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...

Quoted text (14 lines)

> I'm curious to see responses to this thread also. With ICRII/CPR the > ovals were a good place to practice dealing with traffic: it was always > there. Is GPL not suited to ovals? The lack of aero and its adjustments > makes ovals very different from other sims; and as you hint, I don't > think anyone has ever tweeked the AI for ovals. > > Jim > > asdgsa wrote: > > >Are there any good ovals for GPL that have good AI and are not > >converted tracks? > > >

Thanks for passing on your recent experience. I guess there's not enough interest for someone with the knowledge, skills and time to re-program the AI. Jim Steve Blankenship wrote:

Quoted text (40 lines)

>Caveat - just dl'ed 'em and tried a couple of tracks. The AI still seem to >crash all over the place for no apparent reason. The front few AI drivers >at Michigan were doing pretty well, running quickly, drafting each other and >passing back and forth - until they hit some slow lappers; then they >completely lost it. Oh well.... > >SB > >"Steve Blankenship" <[email hidden]> wrote in message >news:SyKh9.99760$[email hidden]... > >>It's for the converted ovals but there are tweaked AI files from Sabre >> >Team > >>at: >> >>http://teamfriendship.m4driving.sm/sabre.htm >> >>SB >> >>"The Carvalho Family" <[email hidden]> wrote in message >>news:[email hidden]... >> >>>I'm curious to see responses to this thread also. With ICRII/CPR the >>>ovals were a good place to practice dealing with traffic: it was always >>>there. Is GPL not suited to ovals? The lack of aero and its adjustments >>>makes ovals very different from other sims; and as you hint, I don't >>>think anyone has ever tweeked the AI for ovals. >>> >>>Jim >>> >>>asdgsa wrote: >>> >>>>Are there any good ovals for GPL that have good AI and are not >>>>converted tracks? >>>> >> > >