Just wondered what graphics resolution people are playing F12002, as I am
wondering whether I should be getting greater FPS than I am.
I have an Athlon 2200+ with 512mb ram and Geforce 4600. Running at 1024 with
AA set to quintox (I think its called), back of pack and start of race is
33FPS to 38FPS. Tried turning AA off and running res at 1600 but FPS went
down to 22-27, so went back to 1024 and AA.
Anyone with a similar system can guide me on whether these figures are about
right?
(Hope all this makes sense as I am rushing out of the door, from work).
"Paul Jager" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:3d8612f8$0$21866$[email hidden]...
> Just wondered what graphics resolution people are playing F12002, as I am
> wondering whether I should be getting greater FPS than I am.
>
> I have an Athlon 2200+ with 512mb ram and Geforce 4600. Running at 1024with
> AA set to quintox (I think its called), back of pack and start of race is
> 33FPS to 38FPS. Tried turning AA off and running res at 1600 but FPS went
> down to 22-27, so went back to 1024 and AA.
>
> Anyone with a similar system can guide me on whether these figures areabout
> right?
>
> (Hope all this makes sense as I am rushing out of the door, from work).
Try 1280*960 or 1280*1024.
I get approx 30 fps at the back of the pack. AA to quincunx.
T-bird 1400/266, 512mb ddrRAM, GF4-4200 300/500, on a Soltek sl-75drv5.
Martin.
1280x960 32bit is where the Ti4600 starts to complain....You should get well
over 60fps on test days with that res on that system and at least 30-40fps
in races...
