This are the facts:
-I was pretty a good driver in GP3. I was able to compete quite
well and to rule the car. Even I thought I could drive a real car more or
less this way
-I am not able to do anything at all with F1 2002 and I'm getting
the perception that the reactions of the car are completely aleatorius.
The questions are:
OPTION 1 -Is GP3 somekind of bullshit which makes easy what is
really difficult????
OPTION 2 -F1 2002 is a bullshit which is simply a bad
simulator.???????
I am inclined to believe option two, but not sure...ned some advice.
Quoted text (24 lines)
> > > >This are the facts: > > -I was pretty a good driver in GP3. I was able to compete quite >well and to rule the car. Even I thought I could drive a real car more or >less this way > -I am not able to do anything at all with F1 2002 and I'm getting >the perception that the reactions of the car are completely aleatorius. > > >The questions are: > > OPTION 1 -Is GP3 somekind of bullshit which makes easy what is >really difficult???? > OPTION 2 -F1 2002 is a bullshit which is simply a bad >simulator.??????? > > > I am inclined to believe option two, but not sure...ned some advice. > > >You cannot compare the PS2 and PC F1 2002. F1 2002 (PC)is by far the most
realistic F1 sim physics wise, whereas the PS2 version is like driving slot
cars, about as accurate physics as turbo outrun.
Cool Hand Luke
-=87=-
"Dan Belcher" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...
dunno
> about Playstation version.
>
> -----------------------------------------
> Dan Belcher
> Webmaster,
> http://simcrash.fameflame.dk


































