PATHETIC
Flame warOff-topic flame thread on Rumsfeld's resignation
A troll mocked Mitch_A over Donald Rumsfeld's resignation, and the thread became a political flame war over Bush, Iraq and the midterm elections with many personal insults.
off-topic
Automated summary.
timmy thompson wrote:
> PATHETIC
Resigns in disgrace.
Mitch, what ya gonna do now, little boy?
Trev B wrote:
> timmy thompson wrote:
> > PATHETIC
>
> Resigns in disgrace.
>
> Mitch, what ya gonna do now, little boy?
Calm down, Moonbats.
I don't follow why rummy "retired" now but at least Bush is trying to throw
out an olive branch to the dems it seems. He fully realizes (unlike you)
that together WE might beat terrorism, apart we cant (as Iraq shows). I
Give all of my support to anyone that believes the islamofacists want to
kill all of us given any opportunity (as is the reality of the situation).
You and your type on the other hand have this OCD that Bush and the Pubs are
the REAL enemy in the world and the Terrorists are only a by-product of
republican power. Now it is the Dems chance. After 6 years of screaming
how badly things are what will the dems do except play the never ending
blame game? We will see, sadly.
3 years of the media saying how poorly the war is going and how bad the
economy is can convince all of the gullible fools out their and this
election proves it. Just as 8 years under Clinton the economy was "THE
GREATEST EVER" despite the incubation of the Enrons of the world, an
internet bubble unlike anything ever seen, my taxes nearly doubling along
with more and more fee's and regulations passed directly to everyone,
relative peace (as the T's were organizing) and yet despite all of the
evidence and the ease of hindsight you would still argue against the blatant
leftwing media manipulation in the USA. Eventually you will see the truth
just as they are now seeing the truth at the BBC.
The democrats won big without any kind of actual plans and 6 years of gov
obstructionism and for that I congratulate them. Pelosi is talking good
things right now but if past history is any indication America just got
FUCKED, and 55% are happy about it. Despite this she has my support and I
hope she can follow through with some of her less costly plans. Until the
impeachment hearings begin anyway...
On the State ballot things are different. Arnold wins huge in a fully blue
state is almost funny except for the fact Arnold acts like a fn dem most of
the time. Prop 87 got beat very badly despite Gore and Clinton shoving it
down our throats daily for 3 months. Prop 86 also lost huge as even
non-smokers realized raping smokers for more BS gov bureaucracy made no
sense.
I expect my already over taxed income just took a very big hit because their
aint no way in hell the tax reductions will be made permanent now. For that
a big FUCK YOU DEM BITCH'S is in order!!!!!!
On the good side the Feds are now less able to actually screw us due to the
impending stalemate. By-partisan talk is just that.. Talk.... When I see
action Ill believe it. Till then its just more political BS.
Go ahead and gloat but come next april 15th we will see if youre still
smiling. I know I wont be. Never mind that last part. Your allowance from
mommy and daddy isnt taxable, yet...
Mitch
"Trev B" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:HLA4h.20116$[email hidden]...
> timmy thompson wrote:
>> PATHETIC
>
> Resigns in disgrace.
>
> Mitch, what ya gonna do now, little boy?
"Mitch_A" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:AkM4h.1653$[email hidden]...
>I don't follow why rummy "retired" now but at least Bush is trying to throw
>out an olive branch to the dems it seems.
Olive branch-- does Bush have an option?
He fully realizes (unlike you)
> that together WE might beat terrorism, apart we cant (as Iraq shows). I
> Give all of my support to anyone that believes the islamofacists want to
> kill all of us given any opportunity (as is the reality of the situation).
Together? Once again, Bush has no choice but to compromise, if he's able to
do that. It's no longer his way or no way. I've been through quite a
number of presidents and I've yet to see one as bad as Bush.
> You and your type on the other hand have this OCD that Bush and the Pubs
> are the REAL enemy in the world and the Terrorists are only a by-product
> of republican power. Now it is the Dems chance. After 6 years of
> screaming how badly things are what will the dems do except play the never
> ending blame game? We will see, sadly.
>
I recall how, when the Republicans gained control of both the House and the
Senate, how everyone said how much was going to get done. Six years hence,
all that was done were bills on gay rights, tax cuts for the wealthy, and
more laws to curb personal liberty.
> 3 years of the media saying how poorly the war is going and how bad the
> economy is can convince all of the gullible fools out their and this
> election proves it.
I don't even watch TV and from what I've been able to glean elsewhere, Bush
has been nothing but a failure. It's funny how the Republicans still refuse
to admit this.
You are FOX's mouthpiece.
All the rest you've commented upon, I now realize, is the result of a raving
maniac. It's obvious that this country needs new leadership-- the
Republicans have totally messed up America and the world.
Alanb
Quoted text (8 lines)
> GREATEST EVER" despite the incubation of the Enrons of the world, an > internet bubble unlike anything ever seen, my taxes nearly doubling along > with more and more fee's and regulations passed directly to everyone, > relative peace (as the T's were organizing) and yet despite all of the > evidence and the ease of hindsight you would still argue against the > blatant leftwing media manipulation in the USA. Eventually you will see > the truth just as they are now seeing the truth at the BBC. >Quoted text (7 lines)
> The democrats won big without any kind of actual plans and 6 years of gov > obstructionism and for that I congratulate them. Pelosi is talking good > things right now but if past history is any indication America just got > FUCKED, and 55% are happy about it. Despite this she has my support and I > hope she can follow through with some of her less costly plans. Until the > impeachment hearings begin anyway... >[email hidden] wrote:
Gays are coming.
Quoted text (14 lines)
> Trev B wrote: > > >>timmy thompson wrote: >> >>>PATHETIC >> >>Resigns in disgrace. >> >>Mitch, what ya gonna do now, little boy? > > > Calm down, Moonbats. >[email hidden] (Alan Bernardo) wrote:
> You are FOX's mouthpiece.
Mitch has always been a useful reminder that the intellectually
challenged voter can be as dangerous for the world as any deluded plane
hijacker. Perhaps more so in my opinion.
The real divisions in the world are caused my lack of education and
reasoning skills. I fear it will always be like this, because despite
huge advances in the availability of education and knowledge, the
average western citizen still seems to understand precious little of the
world beyond their front door.
Andrew McP
"I don't even watch TV" - Where do you get your talking points?
"You are FOX's mouthpiece."- I thought you didn't watch TV?
"It's obvious that this country needs new leadership" - Huh? This county
needs to find consensus and common ground with one another. In a word,
"Unity". That is highly unlikely. Up until Wednesday morning, I think few
would argue that Bush maintained a high morale among the general troop
population. A true sign of leadership. Of course, I concur the tactical side
leaves something to be desired.
I would welcome any ideas you might have for a "leader". It would be
interesting to see what names and reasons why, we could come up with here.
"The moment a person forms a theory his imagination sees in every object
only the traits which favor that theory."
-- Thomas Jefferson, in a letter to Charles Thompson, September 20, 1787
"Alan Bernardo" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...
Quoted text (64 lines)
> > "Mitch_A" <[email hidden]> wrote in message > news:AkM4h.1653$[email hidden]... >>I don't follow why rummy "retired" now but at least Bush is trying to >>throw out an olive branch to the dems it seems. > > Olive branch-- does Bush have an option? > > He fully realizes (unlike you) >> that together WE might beat terrorism, apart we cant (as Iraq shows). I >> Give all of my support to anyone that believes the islamofacists want to >> kill all of us given any opportunity (as is the reality of the >> situation). > > Together? Once again, Bush has no choice but to compromise, if he's able > to do that. It's no longer his way or no way. I've been through quite a > number of presidents and I've yet to see one as bad as Bush. > >> You and your type on the other hand have this OCD that Bush and the Pubs >> are the REAL enemy in the world and the Terrorists are only a by-product >> of republican power. Now it is the Dems chance. After 6 years of >> screaming how badly things are what will the dems do except play the >> never ending blame game? We will see, sadly. >> > > I recall how, when the Republicans gained control of both the House and > the Senate, how everyone said how much was going to get done. Six years > hence, all that was done were bills on gay rights, tax cuts for the > wealthy, and more laws to curb personal liberty. > > >> 3 years of the media saying how poorly the war is going and how bad the >> economy is can convince all of the gullible fools out their and this >> election proves it. > > I don't even watch TV and from what I've been able to glean elsewhere, > Bush has been nothing but a failure. It's funny how the Republicans still > refuse to admit this. > >> GREATEST EVER" despite the incubation of the Enrons of the world, an >> internet bubble unlike anything ever seen, my taxes nearly doubling along >> with more and more fee's and regulations passed directly to everyone, >> relative peace (as the T's were organizing) and yet despite all of the >> evidence and the ease of hindsight you would still argue against the >> blatant leftwing media manipulation in the USA. Eventually you will see >> the truth just as they are now seeing the truth at the BBC. >> > > You are FOX's mouthpiece. > >> The democrats won big without any kind of actual plans and 6 years of gov >> obstructionism and for that I congratulate them. Pelosi is talking good >> things right now but if past history is any indication America just got >> FUCKED, and 55% are happy about it. Despite this she has my support and >> I hope she can follow through with some of her less costly plans. Until >> the impeachment hearings begin anyway... >> > > All the rest you've commented upon, I now realize, is the result of a > raving maniac. It's obvious that this country needs new leadership-- the > Republicans have totally messed up America and the world. > > Alanb >
"Lancelot" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:-
> I think few would argue that Bush maintained a high morale among the
> general troop population. A true sign of leadership.
>
Think again.
http://www.truthout.org/cgi-bin/artman/exec/view.cgi/7/4013
http://www.military.com/NewsContent/0,13319,FL_morale_072105,00.html?ESRC=eb.nl
http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/military/20031016-0647-troopmorale.html
etc
<munches on carrot> Waaaah...Doc. It's "I couldn't care less" and not "I
could care less". <drops down into rabbit hole>
[email hidden] (Andrew MacPherson) wrote:
> caused my lack
Mmm... Freudian slip maybe? Caused *by* lack.
Andrew McP
"Alan Bernardo" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...
Do you practice being a moron, or is it genetic?
Quoted text (63 lines)
> > "Mitch_A" <[email hidden]> wrote in message > news:AkM4h.1653$[email hidden]... >>I don't follow why rummy "retired" now but at least Bush is trying to >>throw out an olive branch to the dems it seems. > > Olive branch-- does Bush have an option? > > He fully realizes (unlike you) >> that together WE might beat terrorism, apart we cant (as Iraq shows). I >> Give all of my support to anyone that believes the islamofacists want to >> kill all of us given any opportunity (as is the reality of the >> situation). > > Together? Once again, Bush has no choice but to compromise, if he's able > to do that. It's no longer his way or no way. I've been through quite a > number of presidents and I've yet to see one as bad as Bush. > >> You and your type on the other hand have this OCD that Bush and the Pubs >> are the REAL enemy in the world and the Terrorists are only a by-product >> of republican power. Now it is the Dems chance. After 6 years of >> screaming how badly things are what will the dems do except play the >> never ending blame game? We will see, sadly. >> > > I recall how, when the Republicans gained control of both the House and > the Senate, how everyone said how much was going to get done. Six years > hence, all that was done were bills on gay rights, tax cuts for the > wealthy, and more laws to curb personal liberty. > > >> 3 years of the media saying how poorly the war is going and how bad the >> economy is can convince all of the gullible fools out their and this >> election proves it. > > I don't even watch TV and from what I've been able to glean elsewhere, > Bush has been nothing but a failure. It's funny how the Republicans still > refuse to admit this. > >> GREATEST EVER" despite the incubation of the Enrons of the world, an >> internet bubble unlike anything ever seen, my taxes nearly doubling along >> with more and more fee's and regulations passed directly to everyone, >> relative peace (as the T's were organizing) and yet despite all of the >> evidence and the ease of hindsight you would still argue against the >> blatant leftwing media manipulation in the USA. Eventually you will see >> the truth just as they are now seeing the truth at the BBC. >> > > You are FOX's mouthpiece. > >> The democrats won big without any kind of actual plans and 6 years of gov >> obstructionism and for that I congratulate them. Pelosi is talking good >> things right now but if past history is any indication America just got >> FUCKED, and 55% are happy about it. Despite this she has my support and >> I hope she can follow through with some of her less costly plans. Until >> the impeachment hearings begin anyway... >> > > All the rest you've commented upon, I now realize, is the result of a > raving maniac. It's obvious that this country needs new leadership-- the > Republicans have totally messed up America and the world. > > Alanb And the soldier went down on a knee somewhere in the Iraqui desert and
wiped the sweat off his brow. Looking around he sees he is fighting
alongside bitches about as far as they can get from kitchens, laundrys and
bedrooms, pooftas and other assorted human trash.
He thinks to himself in a confused and disturbed way - "What the fuck am
I fighting for again?".
"Oh that's right", he remembers. "So I can be "free" to live amongst
bitches about as far as they can get from kitchens, laundrys and bedrooms,
pooftas and other assorted human trash."
"So I can go down to the church and be belted over the head with a bible
and taught to sacrifice myself like a bitch or put up with the demented
bullshit that those that have go on with on a daily basis"
"So i can marvel over the wonderous, long winded rambling of politicians
desperate to make me swallow their complete and utter bullshit"
He feels someone tapping him on the shoulder and turns around to see a
lesbian U.S. troop passing him a joint which he VERY readily accepts. He
needs a break from reality - a BIG break!
But here comes sarg who is yelling that today we are gunna really haul
arse and KICK SOME GOD DAMN BUTT!
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"Someone" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...
Quoted text (16 lines)
> > "Lancelot" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:- >> I think few would argue that Bush maintained a high morale among the >> general troop population. A true sign of leadership. >> > > > > Think again. > > http://www.truthout.org/cgi-bin/artman/exec/view.cgi/7/4013 > http://www.military.com/NewsContent/0,13319,FL_morale_072105,00.html?ESRC=eb.nl > http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/military/20031016-0647-troopmorale.html > > etc >
"Lancelot" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...
Now Lancelot, you of all people must surely know - why King Arthur of
course!
Simple question - how is someone who is a professional bullshit artist
(Politician) going to qualify as a "leader". You don't really think that's
possible do you?
Leaders have balls and brains and thus remind the overwhelming majority
of people that have looked down on them all their life - people don't vote
for that.
If this planet is blessed with a "Leader" any time soon it will have
nothing to do with democracy at all. The individual will come to power via
military superiority which will be largely due to his allegiance with others
of significant military clout and of a "certain" character.
Quoted text (14 lines)
> "I don't even watch TV" - Where do you get your talking points? > > "You are FOX's mouthpiece."- I thought you didn't watch TV? > > "It's obvious that this country needs new leadership" - Huh? This county > needs to find consensus and common ground with one another. In a word, > "Unity". That is highly unlikely. Up until Wednesday morning, I think few > would argue that Bush maintained a high morale among the general troop > population. A true sign of leadership. Of course, I concur the tactical > side leaves something to be desired. > I would welcome any ideas you might have for a "leader". It would be > interesting to see what names and reasons why, we could come up with here. > >Andrew you were right the first time, you lack..... Balls, knowledge, common
sense, foresight, and ability. In other words a perfect 10 to all the other
sad liberals out their....
You show a complete failure of intellect along with a partisan moral compass
that points directly at San Francisco with your rabid insinuations that the
Terrorists are your friends. In case you forget, the Islamofacists hate
homo's even more than Pat Robertson and company do and will cut your head
off for it, unlike Pat who just looks at homosexuality as a mental disorder
brought about by liberal parenting.
You should be scared, Nancy Pelosi Harry Reid will sacrifice YOUR safety for
political gain as they've proven over and over.. What was the democratic
plan again? Oh, you don't actually have one eh....
You wouldn't know reason if it were a bat upside your head and 911 clearly
proves that point. In your fucked up fairytale world 911 was a Bush/CIA
mission not the POOR flower carrying Terrorists that want nothing but peace
for all...
Your elitist bullshit shows so very clearly and fits so perfectly with all
of your butt buddies propaganda in the media and particularly at the BBC.
Fn traitor girl, go hide behind mommies apron and leave the important stuff
to the MEN next time, OK....
Micropenissyndrome isnt an excuse, its genetic.
Mitch
"Andrew MacPherson" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...
Quoted text (8 lines)
> [email hidden] (Andrew MacPherson) wrote: > >> caused my lack > > Mmm... Freudian slip maybe? Caused *by* lack. > > Andrew McP >
"Mitch_A" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:Xt25h.24325$[email hidden]...
> Andrew you were right the first time, you lack..... Balls, knowledge,
> common sense, foresight, and ability. In other words a perfect 10 to all
> the other sad liberals out their....
Where are your balls Mitch? If America is truely in peril why the
hell aren't you fighting?
> You show a complete failure of intellect along with a partisan moral
> compass that points directly at San Francisco with your rabid insinuations
> that the Terrorists are your friends.
Ignorant sloganeering and jingoism. As if we should be afraid
of a goddamn city, of all things.
In case you forget, the Islamofacists hate
What was/is Bush's plan? He's never had a plan. Remember, "victory"
is a goal, not a plan.
> You wouldn't know reason if it were a bat upside your head and 911 clearly
> proves that point. In your fucked up fairytale world 911 was a Bush/CIA
> mission not the POOR flower carrying Terrorists that want nothing but
> peace for all...
No, 9/11 was a miserable Bush failure, that has been substantiated
by every intelligence official debriefed on the subject. He ignored the
Middle East, he ignored anything anybody associated with Clinton
told him, and he ignored a memo titled "Bin Laden determined to strike
within the US."
> Your elitist bullshit shows so very clearly and fits so perfectly with all
> of your butt buddies propaganda in the media and particularly at the BBC.
"Elitist bullshit," a foreign broadcaster's influence, boy, you're just
cutting and pasting right out of the John Birch Society manual. I'll
bet your family built a fallout shelter in the 60's.
Slogans and random invective, Mitch, that's all you've got. You're a
fucking monkey hurling shit around in his cage, full of sound and fury,
signifying nothing.
WS
BTW, I've crossposted this reply to a proper
political NG, so you can leave these nice folks to discuss
racing sims.
Quoted text (7 lines)
> homo's even more than Pat Robertson and company do and will cut your head > off for it, unlike Pat who just looks at homosexuality as a mental > disorder brought about by liberal parenting. > > You should be scared, Nancy Pelosi Harry Reid will sacrifice YOUR safety > for political gain as they've proven over and over.. What was the > democratic plan again? Oh, you don't actually have one eh....[email hidden] (Mitch_A) wrote:
> Your elitist bullshitThe truth is Mitch that some people are better than others at reasoning;
at seeing every side of an argument, just as some people are better
drivers or ranters or cake makers. It's a fact, it's not elitist, and
ignoring it does nobody any favours. Our votes may all be equal, but our
opinions aren't. And that's not a conclusion I reached lightly.
The ability to see the world in pure black and white is not a talent. It
is not admirable. It is the politics of the kindergarten and you and
your kind have been damned many times over by your rhetoric.
While I trust the average person to be a decent human being of equal
value to any other, I do not trust them to have a full grasp of brain
surgery, CPU design, or politics. Sadly democracy requires that we
pretend they do.
Andrew McP
And you somehow think thats you.... Muwahahaha, that's fn rich. Think
again Andy, and check your ego at the door next time K.... See, you cant
write a SINGLE post without stroking yourself while typing. Youre an
ignorant/ blind elitist, but an elitist nonetheless.
OK Andy, youre a very smart person and a small penis does not define you as
a person... Keep telling yourself that over and over just as your doctor
told you to do and everything will be just fine. LOL...
Mitch
"Andrew MacPherson" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...
> [email hidden] (Mitch_A) wrote:
>> Your elitist bullshit
> The truth is Mitch that some people are better than others at reasoning;
> at seeing every side of an argument, just as some people are better
[email hidden] (Mitch_A) wrote:
> And you somehow think thats you....
If you want to look attractive, stand next to someone ugly.
Andrew McP
I am not a Republican. I am not a Democrat.
I am an American.
I believe in Freedom, Privacy, and the right for someone to do as they wish
as long as it doesn't harm others. I served to protect all of this.
Lately, though, these items do not seem to be of major concern to our
current administration, and I think THAT is why a lot of them got booted.
That was just the start. Round 2 comes in 2 years.
And that's about as far into Politics as I wish to go here.
-Larry
"Larry" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:QUu5h.20721$[email hidden]...
> I am not a Republican. I am not a Democrat.
>
> I am an American.
Translation: I'm unable to have my own opinion on anything, so I ride the
fence and jump on the bandwagon of whatever side is most beneficial at the
moment.
>
> I believe in Freedom, Privacy, and the right for someone to do as theywish
> as long as it doesn't harm others. I served to protect all of this.
>
> Lately, though, these items do not seem to be of major concern to our
> current administration, and I think THAT is why a lot of them got booted.
How - *exactly*- has your freedom, privacy, etc. changed in the last eight
years ?
>
> That was just the start. Round 2 comes in 2 years.
>
> And that's about as far into Politics as I wish to go here.
Translation: I'm trying to see if I can get away with throwing in an
unfactual, unsupported statement and sneak away without answering any
rebuttals.
"Larry" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:QUu5h.20721$[email hidden]...
>I am not a Republican. I am not a Democrat.
>
Nor am I. But I can see the reality that democrats are kool-aid drinking
liberals that have literally gone insane from years of believing their own
lies.
> I am an American.
As am I. A patriotic American that realizes appeasement and political
correctness have gone awry. Where people actually believe in truth, justice
and fellow man. The dems only like other human beings to get them in power,
then they revert back to the PETA screaming green, anti_USA tax-happy libs
they really are.
>
> I believe in Freedom, Privacy, and the right for someone to do as they
> wish as long as it doesn't harm others. I served to protect all of this.
>
As do I.
The Terrorists own words from the past 30 years tells the real story. If
not for the measures taken by Bush we would be under attack here in the US.
At what point are the terrorists rights more important than public safety?
In other words what good are human rights when youre dead?
Like Ive said, the Terrorists want/need the Dems to win and the brainwashed
Americans obliged this round. More than likely more innocent Americans will
die from this choice. Eventually common sense will prevail but its going to
take pain and suffering in the mean time.
> Lately, though, these items do not seem to be of major concern to our
> current administration, and I think THAT is why a lot of them got booted.
Yea, according to the NY Times and the leftwing media.. The reality is if
YOU arent a terrorist your privacy is basically unchanged. Just like a
person that uses kiddie porn is more worried about Starforce than someone
who doesnt :)
Im still trying to figure out how in the hell anyone thinks we lost in Iraq.
Pure propaganda right out of Joseph Goebles handbook (now known as the
democrat handbook).
We took over an evil tyrannical government and gave the Iraqi's a free
election while only losing 3000 soldiers lives. I don't care what any idiot
talking head on network TV says that's a fucking victory by any measure
throughout history. Did the administration make mistakes? Of course, Im
not blinded by ideology like most dems are. Many of the mistakes including
Abu-Gharaib were blown so far out of proportion its plain disgusting and
bordering on lies. At the same time the media was in a Abu-gharab frenzy we
had T's cutting off innocent peoples heads yet that didn't even make the
front page.
Leftwing crocodile tears over this war are pure bullshit. These are the
same fn idiots that want to kick the ROTC off campus and literally HATE the
armed services yet if it fits their propaganda they will use it shamelessly
as they have for 3 years. YOU must be smart enough to see through the lies.
If they were so worried about human life then they would be bitching about
the US highway system and the 150,000 innocent Americans killed on them
since 2003 or the gang wars going on throughout the USA. But those are not
political arguments that can actually give the left/dems power (unlike the
spin coming out of Iraq). Ask the troops who is winning or how much good
has occurred since 2003 not the Dan Rather BS version. The stories are
exactly opposite yet you only hear one side.
>
> That was just the start. Round 2 comes in 2 years.
After 3 years of the dems using Bin Ladens talking points (and the moronic
public actually buying it) we'll now see if they do have any kind of plan
other than cut and run, impeachment hearings or higher taxes. This election
may end up benefitting the Pubs in 2 years once the public see's how
ineffective the crats are at everything except lies and obstruction.
>
> And that's about as far into Politics as I wish to go here.
So, let me get this straight Larry. When YOU decide it's ok to talk
politics then you do but when others do the same thing you feel the need for
the standard "take it somewhere else" proclamation. Why is that? Sounds a
bit egotistical to me. If I didn't want to read this I wouldn't, pretty
simple stuff imo. I don't like CNN so I don't watch it. Does that mean I
want it taken off the air?
Mitch
>
> -Larry
>
Fuck off Mitch. You have a serious chemical imbalance.
All hail PETA.
--
David G Fisher
"Mitch_A" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:CXK5h.12738$[email hidden]...
>
>
> "Larry" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
> news:QUu5h.20721$[email hidden]...
>>I am not a Republican. I am not a Democrat.
>>
>
> Nor am I. But I can see the reality that democrats are kool-aid drinking
> liberals that have literally gone insane from years of believing their own
> lies.
>
>> I am an American.
>
>
> As am I. A patriotic American that realizes appeasement and political
> correctness have gone awry. Where people actually believe in truth,
> justice and fellow man. The dems only like other human beings to get them
> in power, then they revert back to the PETA screaming green, anti_USA
> tax-happy libs they really are.
>
>
>>
>> I believe in Freedom, Privacy, and the right for someone to do as they
>> wish as long as it doesn't harm others. I served to protect all of this.
>>
>
>
> As do I.
>
> The Terrorists own words from the past 30 years tells the real story. If
> not for the measures taken by Bush we would be under attack here in the
> US. At what point are the terrorists rights more important than public
> safety? In other words what good are human rights when youre dead?
>
> Like Ive said, the Terrorists want/need the Dems to win and the
> brainwashed Americans obliged this round. More than likely more innocent
> Americans will die from this choice. Eventually common sense will prevail
> but its going to take pain and suffering in the mean time.
>
>
>> Lately, though, these items do not seem to be of major concern to our
>> current administration, and I think THAT is why a lot of them got booted.
>
>
> Yea, according to the NY Times and the leftwing media.. The reality is if
> YOU arent a terrorist your privacy is basically unchanged. Just like a
> person that uses kiddie porn is more worried about Starforce than someone
> who doesnt :)
>
> Im still trying to figure out how in the hell anyone thinks we lost in
> Iraq. Pure propaganda right out of Joseph Goebles handbook (now known as
> the democrat handbook).
>
> We took over an evil tyrannical government and gave the Iraqi's a free
> election while only losing 3000 soldiers lives. I don't care what any
> idiot talking head on network TV says that's a fucking victory by any
> measure throughout history. Did the administration make mistakes? Of
> course, Im not blinded by ideology like most dems are. Many of the
> mistakes including Abu-Gharaib were blown so far out of proportion its
> plain disgusting and bordering on lies. At the same time the media was in
> a Abu-gharab frenzy we had T's cutting off innocent peoples heads yet that
> didn't even make the front page.
>
> Leftwing crocodile tears over this war are pure bullshit. These are the
> same fn idiots that want to kick the ROTC off campus and literally HATE
> the armed services yet if it fits their propaganda they will use it
> shamelessly as they have for 3 years. YOU must be smart enough to see
> through the lies. If they were so worried about human life then they would
> be bitching about the US highway system and the 150,000 innocent Americans
> killed on them since 2003 or the gang wars going on throughout the USA.
> But those are not political arguments that can actually give the left/dems
> power (unlike the spin coming out of Iraq). Ask the troops who is winning
> or how much good has occurred since 2003 not the Dan Rather BS version.
> The stories are exactly opposite yet you only hear one side.
>
>>
>> That was just the start. Round 2 comes in 2 years.
>
>
> After 3 years of the dems using Bin Ladens talking points (and the moronic
> public actually buying it) we'll now see if they do have any kind of plan
> other than cut and run, impeachment hearings or higher taxes. This
> election may end up benefitting the Pubs in 2 years once the public see's
> how ineffective the crats are at everything except lies and obstruction.
>
>
>>
>> And that's about as far into Politics as I wish to go here.
>
>
> So, let me get this straight Larry. When YOU decide it's ok to talk
> politics then you do but when others do the same thing you feel the need
> for the standard "take it somewhere else" proclamation. Why is that?
> Sounds a bit egotistical to me. If I didn't want to read this I wouldn't,
> pretty simple stuff imo. I don't like CNN so I don't watch it. Does that
> mean I want it taken off the air?
>
> Mitch
>
>
>>
>> -Larry
>>
"Mitch_A" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:CXK5h.12738$[email hidden]...
Let's rehash a little here.
a) Until 9/11 the U.S. doesn't give a shit about Iraq. George W Bush (The
1st) came up short (gutless) at the gates of Bagdad in 1990 and NATO packed
up and went home. Point was made even though seed not destroyed. This lack
of guts is becoming a hallmark of U.S. administrations and is akin to the
U.S. policy of not bombing Chinese SAM technicians (during the installation
of SAM sites) during Vietnam at the expense of their very own pilots. It's
all about the big wigs looking after themselves - easy to send others to
their death but when THEIR life is threatened it's a different story.
b) The U.S. cannot get Bin Laden, and thus take advantage of Hussein's
failure to comply with U.N. search criterea as a pitiful attempt to try and
save face with their voters and the international audience.
c) Now we have a bunch of wankers talking about the installation of
democracy and doing the locals a big favour as the killing continues - what
bullshit! Maybe they can teach the new president how to get blown by a
college whore while they're being force fed American culture? Is there a
procedure in place to make sure they put up with disobedint, worthless
bitches and faggots - just how far is the Americanization process going to
be force fed to the no doubt eternally grateful locals?
Quoted text (15 lines)
> > Im still trying to figure out how in the hell anyone thinks we lost in > Iraq. Pure propaganda right out of Joseph Goebles handbook (now known as > the democrat handbook). > > We took over an evil tyrannical government and gave the Iraqi's a free > election while only losing 3000 soldiers lives. I don't care what any > idiot talking head on network TV says that's a fucking victory by any > measure throughout history. Did the administration make mistakes? Of > course, Im not blinded by ideology like most dems are. Many of the > mistakes including Abu-Gharaib were blown so far out of proportion its > plain disgusting and bordering on lies. At the same time the media was in > a Abu-gharab frenzy we had T's cutting off innocent peoples heads yet that > didn't even make the front page. >Speak for yourself, not me you arrogant ass.
-Larry
"James Promme" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:H4G5h.117$[email hidden]...
Quoted text (38 lines)
> > "Larry" <[email hidden]> wrote in message > news:QUu5h.20721$[email hidden]... >> I am not a Republican. I am not a Democrat. >> >> I am an American. > > Translation: I'm unable to have my own opinion on anything, so I ride the > fence and jump on the bandwagon of whatever side is most beneficial at the > moment. > > >> >> I believe in Freedom, Privacy, and the right for someone to do as they > wish >> as long as it doesn't harm others. I served to protect all of this. >> >> Lately, though, these items do not seem to be of major concern to our >> current administration, and I think THAT is why a lot of them got booted. > > How - *exactly*- has your freedom, privacy, etc. changed in the last > eight > years ? > > >> >> That was just the start. Round 2 comes in 2 years. >> >> And that's about as far into Politics as I wish to go here. > > Translation: I'm trying to see if I can get away with throwing in an > unfactual, unsupported statement and sneak away without answering any > rebuttals. > > > > > So, does this mean you can't prove your stated allegations ?
"Larry" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:iy_5h.30016$[email hidden]...
the
> > fence and jump on the bandwagon of whatever side is most beneficial atthe
booted.
Quoted text (14 lines)
> Speak for yourself, not me you arrogant ass. > > -Larry > > "James Promme" <[email hidden]> wrote in message > news:H4G5h.117$[email hidden]... > > > > "Larry" <[email hidden]> wrote in message > > news:QUu5h.20721$[email hidden]... > >> I am not a Republican. I am not a Democrat. > >> > >> I am an American. > > > > Translation: I'm unable to have my own opinion on anything, so I rideQuoted text (10 lines)
> > moment. > > > > > >> > >> I believe in Freedom, Privacy, and the right for someone to do as they > > wish > >> as long as it doesn't harm others. I served to protect all of this. > >> > >> Lately, though, these items do not seem to be of major concern to our > >> current administration, and I think THAT is why a lot of them gotQuoted text (21 lines)
> > > > How - *exactly*- has your freedom, privacy, etc. changed in the last > > eight > > years ? > > > > > >> > >> That was just the start. Round 2 comes in 2 years. > >> > >> And that's about as far into Politics as I wish to go here. > > > > Translation: I'm trying to see if I can get away with throwing in an > > unfactual, unsupported statement and sneak away without answering any > > rebuttals. > > > > > > > > > > > >I made no allegations. You did. I just stated a position.
-Larry
"James Promme" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:_n36h.148$[email hidden]...
Quoted text (56 lines)
> So, does this mean you can't prove your stated allegations ? > > > "Larry" <[email hidden]> wrote in message > news:iy_5h.30016$[email hidden]... >> Speak for yourself, not me you arrogant ass. >> >> -Larry >> >> "James Promme" <[email hidden]> wrote in message >> news:H4G5h.117$[email hidden]... >> > >> > "Larry" <[email hidden]> wrote in message >> > news:QUu5h.20721$[email hidden]... >> >> I am not a Republican. I am not a Democrat. >> >> >> >> I am an American. >> > >> > Translation: I'm unable to have my own opinion on anything, so I ride > the >> > fence and jump on the bandwagon of whatever side is most beneficial at > the >> > moment. >> > >> > >> >> >> >> I believe in Freedom, Privacy, and the right for someone to do as they >> > wish >> >> as long as it doesn't harm others. I served to protect all of this. >> >> >> >> Lately, though, these items do not seem to be of major concern to our >> >> current administration, and I think THAT is why a lot of them got > booted. >> > >> > How - *exactly*- has your freedom, privacy, etc. changed in the last >> > eight >> > years ? >> > >> > >> >> >> >> That was just the start. Round 2 comes in 2 years. >> >> >> >> And that's about as far into Politics as I wish to go here. >> > >> > Translation: I'm trying to see if I can get away with throwing in an >> > unfactual, unsupported statement and sneak away without answering any >> > rebuttals. >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> >> > ><quote>I believe in Freedom, Privacy, and the right for someone to do as
they wish as long as it doesn't harm others. I served to protect all of
this.
Lately, though, these items do not seem to be of major concern to our
current administration,....<unquote>
Ok, so that's your "position" correct ? Since you said it afterall. So
it would seem *you* are the one who needs to explain why you think you're
correct. And since the issues you mention, if true, should be very easy to
prove, let's see it.
Again, show me how - *exactly*- has your freedom, privacy, etc. changed in
the last six years (said eight earlier, oops).
Unless you want to keep dodging the question that is.
"Larry" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:4446h.54792$[email hidden]...
ride
> > the
> >> > fence and jump on the bandwagon of whatever side is most beneficialat
> > the
> >> > moment.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >> I believe in Freedom, Privacy, and the right for someone to do asthey
> >> > wish
> >> >> as long as it doesn't harm others. I served to protect all of this.
> >> >>
> >> >> Lately, though, these items do not seem to be of major concern toour
an
Quoted text (25 lines)
> I made no allegations. You did. I just stated a position. > > -Larry > > "James Promme" <[email hidden]> wrote in message > news:_n36h.148$[email hidden]... > > So, does this mean you can't prove your stated allegations ? > > > > > > "Larry" <[email hidden]> wrote in message > > news:iy_5h.30016$[email hidden]... > >> Speak for yourself, not me you arrogant ass. > >> > >> -Larry > >> > >> "James Promme" <[email hidden]> wrote in message > >> news:H4G5h.117$[email hidden]... > >> > > >> > "Larry" <[email hidden]> wrote in message > >> > news:QUu5h.20721$[email hidden]... > >> >> I am not a Republican. I am not a Democrat. > >> >> > >> >> I am an American. > >> > > >> > Translation: I'm unable to have my own opinion on anything, so IQuoted text (14 lines)
> >> >> current administration, and I think THAT is why a lot of them got > > booted. > >> > > >> > How - *exactly*- has your freedom, privacy, etc. changed in the last > >> > eight > >> > years ? > >> > > >> > > >> >> > >> >> That was just the start. Round 2 comes in 2 years. > >> >> > >> >> And that's about as far into Politics as I wish to go here. > >> > > >> > Translation: I'm trying to see if I can get away with throwing inQuoted text (13 lines)
> >> > unfactual, unsupported statement and sneak away without answering any > >> > rebuttals. > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > >> > > > > > >Only a dickwad like you "mitch-a-for asshole"...
falls into name calling and insults when he has no decent argument to
forward.
Bush is barely above idiot in his IQ and you are slighly below that.
-
"Mitch_A" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:dkn5h.668$[email hidden]...
Quoted text (20 lines)
> And you somehow think thats you.... Muwahahaha, that's fn rich. Think > again Andy, and check your ego at the door next time K.... See, you cant > write a SINGLE post without stroking yourself while typing. Youre an > ignorant/ blind elitist, but an elitist nonetheless. > > OK Andy, youre a very smart person and a small penis does not define you > as a person... Keep telling yourself that over and over just as your > doctor told you to do and everything will be just fine. LOL... > > Mitch > > > "Andrew MacPherson" <[email hidden]> wrote in message > news:[email hidden]... >> [email hidden] (Mitch_A) wrote: >>> Your elitist bullshit >> The truth is Mitch that some people are better than others at reasoning; >> at seeing every side of an argument, just as some people are better > >You really are the example that brainwashing works in Amerika
mitch-a-for-asshole
You seem to beleive all the bullshit-pr-lies that are fed to you - good
american
"Mitch_A" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:CXK5h.12738$[email hidden]...
