Wilson's Simming it...

http://www.dailyf1.com/en/news/news.php?id=2905 Poor chap will get lost if he thinks that ISI's tracks are anything like reality Doug

On Fri, 3 Jan 2003 03:40:13 -0000, "Doug Ellison" <[email hidden]> wrote: >http://www.dailyf1.com/en/news/news.php?id=2905 > >Poor chap will get lost if he thinks that ISI's tracks are anything like >reality Did ISI have anything to do with the console version? Just from the limited time I've had with Thunder 2003 for the xbox (by Tiburion) I'm finding that in addition to being a better arcade racer than the PC version and having many many more features (and tracks, for that matter - god the Pocono infield course rules) the track models are significantly better too. Jason

"Doug Ellison" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:fC7R9.1859$xE1.285847@stones... > http://www.dailyf1.com/en/news/news.php?id=2905 > > Poor chap will get lost if he thinks that ISI's tracks are anything like > reality >I'm sure the "poor chap" would really benefit from your astounding knowledge of all the circuits. Have you contacted Minardi to offer them your knowledge ?

I rented the Xbox version once. Watkins Glen really does not look right to me. Some things I could chalk up to perspective differences, but the s/f straight looks almost flat, and that is clearly wrong. "Jason Moyer" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...

Quoted text (10 lines)

> > Did ISI have anything to do with the console version? > > Just from the limited time I've had with Thunder 2003 for the xbox (by > Tiburion) I'm finding that in addition to being a better arcade racer > than the PC version and having many many more features (and tracks, > for that matter - god the Pocono infield course rules) the track > models are significantly better too. > > Jason

"Doug Ellison" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:fC7R9.1859$xE1.285847@stones...

Quoted text (7 lines)

> http://www.dailyf1.com/en/news/news.php?id=2905 > > Poor chap will get lost if he thinks that ISI's tracks are anything like > reality > > Doug >

Poor ISI, they get slighted for tracks they didn't even design. ;0) He's playing the SONY produced/developed F1 game entitled "Formula One" 2002. ISI/EA uses "F1" in their titles. Here's the review by Daily F1 referenced in the article. http://www.dailyf1.com/en/features/feature.php?id=88 The tracks might be pretty realistic, can't tell from that review. I played the 2001 version briefly and the tracks were different than ISI (couldn't say if they were more accurate since I wouldn't know without photos). -- Joe M.

Must be very accurate if the prize giving scene is anything to go by. That must be M Schumacher first, that'll be um Button second and er um oh a Minardi third! Andi. "Joe M." <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...

Quoted text (13 lines)

> "Doug Ellison" <[email hidden]> wrote in message > news:fC7R9.1859$xE1.285847@stones... > > http://www.dailyf1.com/en/news/news.php?id=2905 > > > > Poor chap will get lost if he thinks that ISI's tracks are anything like > > reality > > > > Doug > > > > Poor ISI, they get slighted for tracks they didn't even design. ;0) He's > playing the SONY produced/developed F1 game entitled "Formula One" 2002. > ISI/EA uses "F1" in their titles. Here's the review by Daily F1

referenced > in the article. > > http://www.dailyf1.com/en/features/feature.php?id=88 > > The tracks might be pretty realistic, can't tell from that review. Iplayed

Quoted text (7 lines)

> the 2001 version briefly and the tracks were different than ISI (couldn't > say if they were more accurate since I wouldn't know without photos). > > -- > Joe M. > >

"Joe M." <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...

Quoted text (13 lines)

> "Doug Ellison" <[email hidden]> wrote in message > news:fC7R9.1859$xE1.285847@stones... > > http://www.dailyf1.com/en/news/news.php?id=2905 > > > > Poor chap will get lost if he thinks that ISI's tracks are anything like > > reality > > > > Doug > > > > Poor ISI, they get slighted for tracks they didn't even design. ;0) He's > playing the SONY produced/developed F1 game entitled "Formula One" 2002. > ISI/EA uses "F1" in their titles. Here's the review by Daily F1

referenced > in the article. My bad - presumed the F12002 for a PS2 was the same title as F12002 for the PC :O Doug

>"Joe M." <[email hidden]> wrote > The tracks might be pretty realistic, can't tell from that review. Just looking at that Montreal picture (the third one) I can already tell you it's not realistic. It's not like that in reality. -- -- Fran�ois M�nard <ymenard> -- http://ymenard.cjb.net/ -- This announcement is brought to you by the Shimago-Dominguez Corporation - helping America into the New World...